Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions (H2H-TCI) Children/Youth With Special Health Care Needs (CYSHCN) (H2H-CYSHCN)

September 5, 2025 updated by: Duke University

Hospital-to-Home Care Coordination for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs

Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of focused dose vs extended dose hospital-to-home Transitional Care Interventions (H2H-TCI) on health service use and parent-reported confidence for hospitalized CYSHCN. Aim 2: Compare the effectiveness of focused and extended dose H2H-TCI among vulnerable CYSHCN subgroups. Hypothesis: Both H2H-TCI arms will improve primary outcomes more for CYSHCN with higher versus lower clinical complexity; while extended H2H-TCI will better mitigate racial/ethnic outcome disparities than focused H2H-TCI. Aim 3: Evaluate implementation context, processes, and mechanisms via a multi-phase mixed methods study design.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Aims Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of focused dose vs extended dose hospital-to-home Transitional Care Interventions (H2H-TCI) on health service use and parent-reported confidence for hospitalized CYSHCN.

Hypothesis: Extended H2H-TCI will be associated with lower acute care use and higher confidence than focused H2H-TCI.

Secondary Aims Aim 2: Compare the effectiveness of focused and extended dose H2H-TCI among vulnerable CYSHCN subgroups.

Hypothesis: Both H2H-TCI arms will improve primary outcomes more for CYSHCN with higher versus lower clinical complexity; while extended H2H-TCI will better mitigate racial/ethnic outcome disparities than focused H2H-TCI.

Aim 3: Evaluate implementation context, processes, and mechanisms via a multi-phase mixed methods study design.

The study populations consist of adult parent/caregivers' dyad and children/youth with special health care needs. Participants will be randomized to focused dose intervention after discharge or an extended dose intervention. the single dose will receive one phone call from an interventionist post discharge, the extended dose group will receive weekly phone calls for one month from an interventionist.

Analysis of data from the confidence-mediated and vulnerable patient/family characteristics-moderated pathways will address Aims 1 and 2, respectively.

During extraction of data from each site's Electronic Health Record (EHR) data security risks will be mitigated by following established standard operating procedures at Duke and the University of North Carolina (UNC). During preparation of site-based analytical datasets risks will be mitigated by limiting Protected Health Information (PHI) as much as and as early as is practical. All datasets will be stored and reviewed on a secure, cloud-based Protected Analytical and Computing Environment (PACE) at Duke and at UNC in the Secure Research Workspace (SRW).

The investigators will plan to create a Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) that includes expert clinicians who are not active study team members and are independent of the study sponsor. The DSMB will oversee the safety of volunteers participating in the study as needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

480

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • Recruiting
        • UNC Hospitals
        • Contact:
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27701

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For this study, eligible children/youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) and adult parent/caregiver dyads will be those who meet the following inclusion criteria:

    1. Child is a CYSHCN, defined as having seen two or more distinct specialty areas for outpatient visits during the 12 months prior to index hospitalization admission date
    2. Age of hospitalized child is under 18 years old
    3. Child hospitalized on a general pediatrics inpatient service line at participating site
    4. Adult parent/caregiver for the child is 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child exclusion criteria:

    1. Child will be discharged to any location besides home (e.g., long-term care or residential facility, skilled nursing facility, inpatient acute rehabilitation, psychiatric facility)
    2. Child is a ward of the state or has an ongoing social services investigation
    3. Child is already receiving transitional care, intensive longitudinal care coordination (e.g., organ/disease-specific clinical program, clinical division within the same institution as the hospital [e.g., Children's Complex Care Program at UNC; Complex Care Service at Duke]), and/or longitudinal population health care coordination as part of a bundled alternative payment care model.
  • Parent/caregiver exclusion criteria include:

    1. Age less than 18 years old
    2. Diminished capacity to provide consent/participate
    3. Primary language for parent/caregiver is any language besides English or Spanish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Focused Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions
Focused dose H2H-TCIs will consist of a one-time post-discharge phone call completed within 72 hours post-hospital discharge by a clinical interventionist (e.g., nurse care coordinator or care manager). Calls will follow a structured template that provides empirically supported core H2H-TCI functions (follow-up care access, contingency planning, medication review, family education). The interventionist will also conduct a pre-hospital discharge clinical needs assessment with the parent.
Active Comparator: Extended Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions
Extended dose H2H-TCIs will include a pre-discharge clinical needs assessment and initial phone call within 72 hours post-discharge, similar to the focused arm. After the initial contact, the dose of the extended H2H-TCI will increase as subjects receive high-intensity support during weekly post-discharge phone contacts through 30 days post-discharge. All contacts in the extended dose arm will be completed by a transition coach interventionist (e.g., nurse care coordinator or care manager) who will be formally trained on pillars of the Care Transitions Intervention© (CTI), a multi-faceted H2H-TCI that is the basis for the extended dose arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-day acute care use
Time Frame: 30 days post-hospital discharge
30-day, all-cause composite readmission and emergency department (ED) visit rate
30 days post-hospital discharge
Caregiver confidence
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 days post-discharge
Change in caregiver-reported confidence that their child can avoid hospitalization within the next one month (1=not confident; 10=fully confident; <5 is low confidence)
Baseline, 30 days post-discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
7-day acute care use
Time Frame: 7-days post-discharge
All-cause composite readmission and ED visit rate at 7 days
7-days post-discharge
14-day acute care use
Time Frame: 14 days post-discharge
All-cause composite readmission and ED visit rate at 14 days
14 days post-discharge
Readmissions
Time Frame: 7, 14, 30 days post-discharge
All-cause readmission rate at 7, 14, and 30 days
7, 14, 30 days post-discharge
Emergency Department (ED) visits
Time Frame: 7, 14, 30 days post-discharge
All-cause ED visits at 7, 14, and 30 days
7, 14, 30 days post-discharge
Outpatient follow-up visit attendance
Time Frame: 7, 14, 30 days post-discharge
Completed outpatient visits by clinical area (primary, specialty, allied health)
7, 14, 30 days post-discharge
Days at home
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days post-discharge
Annualized days without clinical visits (clinical days without healthcare visits)
30 and 90 days post-discharge
Caregiver strain
Time Frame: Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge
Change in caregiver-reported strain (measured by scores on seven-item Caregiver Strain Questionnaire Short Form 7, CGSQ-SF7 survey), where a higher score indicates a higher level of caregiver strain.
Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge
Global health status
Time Frame: Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge
Change in caregiver-reporter PROMIS global health status survey. PROMIS assessments are scored on a T-score metric. High scores mean more of the concept being measured. 10 points on the T-score metric is one standard deviation (SD). PROMIS scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in a referent population.
Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge
Caregiver mental health-related quality of life (HR-QOL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge
Change in caregiver-reported mental HR-QOL as scored on the Medical Outcomes Short Form 12 (SF12) survey.
Baseline, 7, 14, 30, and 90-days post-discharge
Quality of hospital-to-home care transitions
Time Frame: 30 days post-discharge
Pediatric Transition Experience Measure (P-TEM): eight-item, parent-reported measure of overall process and quality of hospital-to-home transitions.
30 days post-discharge
Fidelity
Time Frame: approximately 90 days post-discharge
Percentage of intervention core components delivered as planned (goal: ≥80%)
approximately 90 days post-discharge
Feasibility Acceptability Appropriateness
Time Frame: approximately 90 days post-discharge
Clinical staff and caregiver-reported composite score responses to Feasibility of Implementation, Acceptability of Implementation, and Implementation Appropriateness surveys (4 items each)
approximately 90 days post-discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Ming, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatrics

Clinical Trials on Focused Dose Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care Interventions

Subscribe