Gut-brain Health Effects of PREbiotics in Older Adults With Suspected COgnitive DEcline (PRECODE)

August 19, 2025 updated by: Yannick Vermeiren, Wageningen University

Gut-brain Health Effects of PREbiotics in Older Adults With Suspected COgnitive DEcline: The PRECODE Study

As people around the world are living longer, the number of individuals with dementia, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD), is expected to triple by 2050. There's growing evidence suggesting that our gut health might play a role in the prevention of dementia. The connection between our gut and brain, known as the gut-brain axis, is becoming an important area of study. Research in animals has shown that different types of dietary fibre can improve gut health, brain function, mood, blood sugar level and the immune system and may even prevent certain harmful brain changes seen in Alzheimer's disease. Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is a condition where individuals notice a decline in their mental abilities, and it can be an early sign of Alzheimer's disease.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if dietary fibres can improve gut and brain health in older individuals, between the ages of 60 and 79 years, who notice problems in their mental abilities, and meet the criteria of SCD. Three different dietary fibres will be given, and researchers will compare three different fibres to a placebo product to see if there is a difference between the fibres and the placebo.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does dietary fibre improve working memory?
  2. Does dietary fibre improve other markers of brain function?
  3. Does dietary fibre improve gut health?
  4. Does dietary fibre improve the immune system and blood glucose levels?
  5. Does dietary fibre improve mood?

Participants will:

  • Consume dietary fibres twice a day, mixed in water, tea or coffee, for a period of 26 weeks
  • Have two functional MRI scans, and three additional study visits, where blood, urine and feces will be collected
  • Undergo a number of neuropsychological tests, aimed at evaluating brain function
  • Fill out questionnaires on their general health, mood, dietary habits, gut health
  • Wear smartwatches for one week, at the beginning and the end of the study

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Due to the greying of society, a triplication of the number of people with dementia worldwide, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) as the commonest form, is expected by 2050. Compelling evidence points towards a crucial role of intestinal health as one potential etiological modifier of dementia, with the (microbiota) gut-brain axis (MGBA) receiving increasing attention. A number of preclinical studies have demonstrated benefit of various sources of dietary fibre for their capacity to improve gut health, cognitive functioning, general mood, glycaemia, immunogenicity, and, to inhibit tau phosphorylation, the latter which is a hallmark in AD brain. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) lies on the continuum of AD, and subjects with this condition are at increased risk of further conversion to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD. Currently, no cure is available for AD. Various symptomatic and a few disease-modifying treatments are available, but these treatments only have very limited or mild clinical effects and are often accompanied by severe side effects. Clinical follow-up studies to evaluate the effect of dietary fibre in older adults with suspected cognitive decline are required, but are still lacking to date.

Objective: The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effect of 26 weeks of supplementation with three different dietary fibres (chicory inulin, resistant dextrin, and seaweed polysaccharide) compared to a placebo (maltodextrin) on microbiota gut-brain health effects in older adults (aged 60-79) with Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus (SCD+) by assessing changes in brain function and working memory by blood oxygen level dependant (BOLD) signal activity and task accuracy during n-back task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessment.

The secondary objectives are to investigate the effects of 26 weeks of supplementation with dietary fibre (chicory inulin, resistant dextrin, and, seaweed polysaccharide) compared to placebo (maltodextrin) in older adults on the following parameters related to potential gut-brain pathways:

  1. neuropsychological test battery scoring,
  2. other relevant brain health parameters,
  3. relevant intestinal health parameters, and
  4. immune and metabolic parameters.

Study population: 164 older adults (60-79 years) with SCD+.

Study design implementation:

Participants will undergo assessments at baseline (T0), mid-study (T1/2, after 13 weeks) and at study end (T1, after 26 weeks. Each participant will have five study visits in total: two at T0, one at T1/2 and two at T1.

At each of the timepoints the following will be collected/performed at WUR: Sample collection (blood, urine (omitted in week 13), faeces); general cognitive assessments (see NTB; Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) (baseline and end only), GDS-15, GAD-7); general physiological measures (blood pressure, BMI, grip-strength); dietary assessment (MIND-adjusted Eetscore, FFQ). At ZGV working memory will be evaluated using BOLD fMRI signalling and task accuracy using an n-back task paradigm. Additionally, high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted anatomical images of main regions of interest (hippocampi, (pre)frontal-, and temporal cortices) will be acquired.

For two periods of one week, corresponding with the baseline and week 26 visits, participants will wear smartwatches. These watches will be worn continuously and data will be gathered regarding cardiovascular functioning (heart rate), physical activity and mood (push messages).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

164

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Wageningen, Netherlands
        • Wageningen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent
  2. Fluency in Dutch (speaking, reading, writing)
  3. Age between 60-79 years (at screening)
  4. Subjective cognitive decline plus (SCD+), (criteria of Jessen et al.):

4.1 Self-reported worsening of memory; 4.2 Indication of repetitive concerns (worries) associated with SCD; 4.3 With at least one of the following two features present: (i) onset of SCD within the last 5 years; (ii) age at onset ≥60 years of age;

5. Presence of at least 2 self-reported risk factors for cognitive decline (based on LIBRA criteria): (i) Diabetes mellitus type II (ii) High cholesterol (iii) Hypertension (iv) High BMI (v) Heart disease (vi) Unhealthy diet (lower regular adherence to Mediterranean diet components such as fish, vegetables, olive oil, pasta and red wine)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current participation in other intervention trials
  2. Technologically illiterate (complete incompetence in working with computers, apps, online questionnaires, smartwatches etc.)
  3. No internet access from home
  4. Clinical diagnosis of ≥1 of the following:

    • Neurological pathology (e.g. MCI, dementia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy);
    • Current malignant disease(s), with or without treatment;
    • Current psychiatric disorder(s) (e.g. major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, psychosis, PTSD);
    • Symptomatic/decompensated cardiovascular disease (e.g. stroke, angina pectoris, heart failure, recent myocardial infarction);
    • Severe visual impairment or blindness
    • Hearing or communicative impairment.
    • Gastrointestinal tract disorder such as irritable bowel syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease (e.g. Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis).
  5. Current or recent (<6 weeks) use of prebiotic, probiotic, or dietary fibre supplement that may modulate the microbiota, or unwilling to stop the use of supplements during the study
  6. Current or recent (<6 weeks) of algae/phytoplankton supplements such as spirulina or chlorella, or unwilling to stop the use of supplements during the study
  7. Use of psychotropic medication (anti-depressants, anti-psychotics)
  8. Use of antibiotics in the 3 months before starting the study or planned use during the study
  9. Being an employee of the Human Nutrition and Health Division of Wageningen University.
  10. Significant cognitive impairment assessed using the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status battery (TICS-m score <23)
  11. Request to have Apo-E genotype result disclosed
  12. Allergies to fish or shellfish
  13. Having a contra-indication to MRI scanning including:

    • Ferromagnetic implants:

      • Active implantable medical devices such as: insulin pump / medicine pump / neurostimulator; pacemaker / defibrillator;
      • Other passive implants such as: punctured port-a-cath; synthetic heart valve
    • Intra-orbital or intra-ocular metallic fragments
    • Claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Maltodextrin
Maltodextrin (7g/day) will be provided in two divided doses (3.5g per dose)
Experimental: Chicory inulin
Chicory inulin (12g/day) divided over two dosages (6g per dose)
Experimental: Resistant dextrin
Resistant dextrin (14g/day) divided over two dosages (7g per dose)
Experimental: Seaweed polysaccharide
Seaweed polysaccharide (1g/day) divided over two dosages (0.5g per dose). Additionally contains 7g/day of placebo as a volumetric and isocaloric filler.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect on working memory during n-back task fMRI
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Effects on working memory will be assessed by blood-oxygen level dependant (BOLD) signal activity during 2-back task performed during fMRI scanning
Measured at baseline and week 26
Effect on working memory performance during n-back task fMRI
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Effects on working memory performance will be assessed by task accuracy during 2-back task performed during fMRI scanning
Measured at baseline and week 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect on cognitive functioning as measured by a neuropsychological test battery
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on z-scoring of cognitive domains- episodic memory, executive function and working memory as measured by Cognitive Function Composite test battery
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on ADAS-Cog Word Recall cognitive assessment (episodic memory)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Mean number of correct responses across three trials; Score 0 to 10. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on ADAS-Cog Word Recognition cognitive assessment (episodic memory)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Mean number of correct responses across three trials. Score 0 to 12. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on Digit Symbol Substitution Test cognitive assessment (executive function)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Amount of symbols correctly substituted. Score 0 - 90. Higher score indicates better outcome
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on Digit Span Backward Task cognitive assessment (working memory)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Longest span of digits correctly recalled. Score 2-8. Higher score indicates better outcome
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on Category Fluency Test cognitive assessment (executive function)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Number of uniquely named items from category within 60 seconds. Higher score indicates better outcome
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on ADAS-Cog Orientation cognitive assessment (episodic memory)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
The number of correct responses on orientation. Score 0 to 8. Higher score indicates better outcome
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on tryptophan metabolites
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Tryptophan related neurotransmitters and metabolites (plasma)
Measured at baseline and week 26
Effect on amyloid-beta (Aβ) biomarker
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio (plasma)
Measured at baseline and week 26
Effect on neuroplasticity
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels (serum)
Measured at baseline and week 26
Effect on brain regions of interest
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Structural MRI with T1- and T2-weighted anatomical images of regions of interest (hippocampi, (pre)frontal-and temporal cortices)
Measured at baseline and week 26
Effect on hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Cortisol levels (serum)
Measured at baseline and week 26
Effect on intestinal barrier integrity
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Assay-based panel of intestinal barrier integrity markers measured in blood
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on intestinal inflammation
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Assay-based panel of intestinal inflammatory markers measured in faeces
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on gastrointestinal transit time
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Gut transit time measured by blue muffin consumption and appearance of blue colour in faeces
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on gastrointestinal symptoms
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Self-rated gastrointestinal symptoms as measured by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on self-reported stool consistency
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on stool consistency as measured by Bristol Stool Scale (BSS)
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on stool consistency
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on stool consistency as measured by faecal water content
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on qualitative faecal microbiota composition
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Qualitative faecal microbiota composition as measured by 16s rRNA sequencing
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on quantitative faecal microbiota composition
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Quantitative faecal microbiota composition as measured by digital droplet PCR
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on faecal metabolites
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Faecal short-chain fatty acids (acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid) and branched-chain fatty acids (isobutyric acid, isovaleric acid, 4-methyl valeric acid) as measured by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID)
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on faecal pH
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Faecal pH measurement
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on immune parameters
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Inflammatory cytokine panel measured in blood
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on glucose homeostasis
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Assay-based panel of markers to evaluate glucose homestasis in blood
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on lipid profile
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Assay-based panel of markers to analyse lipid profile in blood
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect on heart rate
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Heart rate as determined by wearable Samsung Active 2.0 Smartwatches
Measured at baseline and week 26
Effect on physical activity
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and week 26
Physical activity (pedometer) as determined by wearable Samsung Active 2.0 Smartwatches
Measured at baseline and week 26
Effect on BMI
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Measured in kg/m^2
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on blood pressure
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure as measured by sphygmomanometer
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on mood as measured by Samsung Active 2.0 Smartwatches
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Mood determined by push notifications (sad, stressed, neutral, happy, or angry) as determined by wearable Samsung Active 2.0 Smartwatches
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on mood as determined by GDS-15 questionnaire
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Self-reported depressive symptoms by Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) questionnaire
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Effect on mood as determined by GAD-7 questionnaire
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26
Self-reported anxiety symptoms by Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire
Measured at baseline, week 13 and week 26

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subjective Cognitive Decline

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe