- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06435494
Cross-sectorial Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Degenerative Shoulder Conditions (C-PRO)
C-PRO - The Effect of Cross-sectorial Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Chronic Degenerative Shoulder Conditions
This research project aims to test if systematic (extensive) use of patient-reported outcomes across treatment boundaries can
- improve patients' and health professionals' understanding of individual patients' conditions and health changes,
- improve indications for treatment,
- strengthen patient empowerment, and
- reduce patients' utilization of health services.
The study will be performed in the particular context of patients with chronic degenerative conditions of the shoulder. These patients are characterized by contact with numerous health professionals from different health sectors, such as general practitioner, physiotherapists and surgical referral centres, which challenges coherence and communication for the individual treatment decisions. The research project will be performed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 1-year inclusion period and two years of follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Charlottenlund, Denmark, 2920
- Privathospitalet Danmark
-
Hellerup, Denmark, 2900
- Department of rehabilitation, Gentofte Kommune
-
Hellerup, Denmark, 2900
- Division of shoulder and elbow surgery, Department of orthopaedics, Univesity Hospital Gentofte
-
Rødovre, Denmark, 2610
- Genoptræning og Rehabilitering, Rødovre Kommune
-
Rødovre, Denmark, 2610
- Mit Lægehus
-
-
Hellerup
-
Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark, 2900
- Department of Physiotherapy, Univesity Hospital Gentofte
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- shoulder pain with no acute trauma
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age <18 years
- Non-Danish citizenship
- Unable to understand written or spoken Danish
- Inability to master electronic means of communication and/or not having an electronic communication (E-boks)
- Employee at participating centre or other relation to participating health professionals that might affect independent consent
- Psychiatric conditions, mental conditions and substance abuse that might affect the ability to provide informed consent or responding to PROMs
- Disseminated malignant condition, other serious medical conditions or other life crisis where the focus on a shoulder research project is unreasonable
- Already included in the study with the contralateral shoulder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
All patients will be asked to complete a number of questionaires: EQ5D-5L, a study specific questionaire (designed specifically for this study) and a shoulder-disease-specific questionaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score).
For patients in the intervention group, the results of the questionaires will be accessable for patient and health-care professionals and will be used to illustrate the problems, make a prognostic model for the specific patient based on previous PRO results from other patients and will be used in monitoring the treatment of the patient.
|
Se description of the arms
|
|
No Intervention: Control
All patients will be asked to complete a number of questionaires: EQ5D-5L, a study specific questionaire and a shoulder-disease-specific questionaire.
For patients int he control group, this will be collected, but not accessed or used during the treatment of the patient.
The data will be used in the final analyses of the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment cost per change in life quality
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years.
|
The treatment cost during the study period expressed as the cost per improvement in life quality, similar to the cost per QALY (quality adjusted life years).
The total cost will be calculated from hospital contacts, physiotherapy sessions and primary healthcare contacts.
The EQ5D-5L will be used as a generic life quality measure.
The primary outcome for the intervention and control group will be compared.
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment cost per change in life quality stratisfied according to the specific shoulder diagnosis
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
The same as primary outcome, but stratified according to the specific shoulder diagnosis
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
Patient satisfaction with the treatment of their shoulder problem
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
Measured by questionaire (specifically the question "are you satisfied with the treatment fo your shoulder so far"?
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
Number of patients treated with surgery
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
To evaluate if any difference in referral to surgery occurs between the intervention group and the control group, and analyse if any reasons for a difference can be identified
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
Number of contacts with either the hospital or the family doctor due to problems with the treated shoulder
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
To evaluate if any difference in medical contacts due to the treated shoulder occurs between the intervention and the control groups, and analyse if any reasons for a difference can be identified
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
Number and types of complications during the treatment of the shoulder problem
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
To evaluate if any difference in complications in relation to the treatment of the shoulder occurs between the intervention and the control groups, and analyse if any reasons for a difference can be identified
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
For patients still working: Number and duration (measured in days) of any periods of sick-leave/unemployment due to the shoulder problem
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
To evaluate if any difference in employment-status and/or sick-leave occurs between the intervention and the control groups, and analyse if any reasons for a difference can be identified
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
Development in the PRO score, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, over time for each specific shoulder disease
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
To evaluate the development of PRO scores during a treatment of the included shoulder diseases with regards to the different treatment options, to create a reference for future treatments of these patients
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
PRO score, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, as predictors?
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
To evaluate if a PRO score can differentiate patients with regards to who might benefit from specific treatment regimens/effect of treatments measured by PRO
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
If use of systematic PRO scores, represented by Oxford Shoulder Score, changes the referral-pattern between the involved sectors
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
To evaluate if PRO scores has the potential to be used to screen patients before making a referral between sectors
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
Health professionals' assessments of history and usefulness of the prognosis tools developed for this study (the Database setup in Procordo).
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
To evaluate if the involved professionals experience any gain in the use of the PRO scores in the daily treatment of the patients.
This will be evaluated at every visit with the patient by a questionaire to the treating professionals.
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
|
Patient satisfaction with the PRO score system build in the Database system (Procordo)
Time Frame: From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
Satisfaction and qualitative assessment of history and prognosis tool (intervention group only).
This will be investigated by questionaire in relation to the completion of the PROs every 3 month during the study period.
|
From inclusion time and the 2 following years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Anders Odgaard, MD, DrMed, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Principal Investigator: Anne M Nyholm, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Study Chair: Bo S Olsen, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Study Chair: Carsten B Juhl, PT, MPH, PhD, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Study Chair: Bente A Esbensen, Cand.cur., PhD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- H-23039139
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
-
Lokman Hekim UniversityCompletedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Impingement Syndrome | Rotator Cuff Impingement SyndromeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial Pain Syndrome | Subacromial Impingement | Impingement Syndrome, ShoulderIndonesia
-
China Medical University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
California State University, Long BeachEnrolling by invitationSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Rotator Cuff Syndrome | Apical Shoulder PainUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Bursitis | Pilates ExerciseEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingSubacromial Impingement SyndromeEgypt
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompletedSubacromial Impingement SyndromeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Near East University, TurkeyCompletedSubacromial Impingement SyndromeCyprus
-
Uskudar State HospitalNot yet recruitingSubacromial Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Pain | Subacromial Impingement | Shoulder Impingement
-
Copenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreUniversity of Copenhagen; Aalborg University; Metropolitan University CollegeCompletedSubacromial Impingement SyndromeDenmark
Clinical Trials on Systematic use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical work with the patients
-
University of SurreyCompleted
-
University of AlbertaUniversity Hospital FoundationCompletedDepression | Multiple Sclerosis | Anxiety | Patient SatisfactionCanada
-
Universidade da CoruñaUniversity of Alcala; University of SevilleTerminatedDisability Physical | Disabling Disease | Disability, LearningSpain
-
Hospital del MarNot yet recruitingQuality of Life | Kidney Failure, Chronic | Frailty | Kidney Transplantation | Patient Reported Outcome Measures
-
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruitingChronic Hepatitis BChina
-
IHU StrasbourgCompleted
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenB. Braun Medical SACompleted
-
University GhentBijzonder onderzoeksfonds (BOF)CompletedPain | TinnitusBelgium
-
University of AarhusOdense University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital; Bispebjerg Hospital; University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingQuality of Life | Colorectal Cancer | SurvivorshipDenmark
-
AO Innovation Translation CenterActive, not recruitingHip Fractures | Tibial Fractures | Distal Radius Fracture | Ankle Fractures | Humeral Fracture, ProximalNetherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, United States, Austria, Colombia