- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03948958
PREMO Study: to Investigate Port REMoval Outcomes (PREMO)
Pilot Trial to Assess Functional, Microbial, Radiological and Patient Reported Outcomes at Totally Implantable Venous Access Device (Port) Removal (PREMO Study)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Other: Evaluation of the catheter function
- Other: Catheter tip location, thrombus, sleeve and device damage visualization
- Other: Catheter-related colonization
- Other: patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) related to the presence of the TIVAD
- Other: Macroscopic evaluation of the port chamber and catheter
Detailed Description
A Totally Implantable Venous Access Device (TIVAD) or so called implantable port that is no longer in use for intravenous therapy, should be removed or flushed at established intervals to promote and maintain patency. The maintenance procedure consists of a 10 ml 0.9% sodium chloride pulsatile flush. No consensus has been established regarding the optimal duration of the interval between 2 maintenance sessions. In het university hospitals Leuven the current interval is 3 months. Studies confirmed the safety and efficacy of an extended maintenance interval to once every 4 months. Many patients have relatively poor compliance with their regular port flushing procedure.
Clinicians tend to prolong the recommended interval or even to omit the maintenance procedure. Therefore in clinical practice, intervals vary widely among institutions. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive investigation of the risks related to catheter patency, bacterial colonization and catheter integrity, has never been performed in patients whose port is electively removed using a 3 months flushing maintenance regimen. To assess the impact of the maintenance interval, patients will be included in the study if the patient's TIVAD is not being used for regularly therapy for a total period of at least one year.
This exploratory study will focus on catheter function and colonisation, tip position and tip thrombosis, sleeve formation, removal problems and also patient experiences at elective planned TIVAD removal therapy.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- University Hospitals Leuven
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of 18 years and older, with a TIVAD that is no longer used for intravenous therapy on a regular basis for the past 365 days after completing initially planned treatment.
- Patients planned for an elective TIVAD removal under local anaesthesia.
- Patients able to participate in the study and willing to sign an informed consent.
- Patients able to understand and read Dutch.
Exclusion Criteria:
• History of fever and/or chills following last flushing procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: TIVAD evaluation
TIVAD evaluation at port removal evaluation of catheter function, visualization of catheter tip, presence of thrombus material and sleeve and any device damage during linogram (contrast injection via TIVAD), tip and chamber content microbiological culture, macroscopic catheter and port chamber evaluation PROM: patient reported outcome measurements regarding TIVAD insertion, presence and removal
|
Catheter function will be measured by the CINAS (Catheter injection and aspiration classification)
Catheter tip location, thrombus, sleeve and device damage will be visualized by linogram
TIVAD colonization will be investigated by microbiological culture of the tip and chamber content
PROM will evaluate patient's experiences regarding the TIVAD insertion, dwell time, and removal using the Leuven Patient Reported Experiences at Port removal (Leuven PREP) questionnaire.
Macroscopic evaluation of the port chamber and catheter will be performed after port removal.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
TIVAD function
Time Frame: during the 1 day of TIVAD removal, before the linogram
|
will be assessed in terms of both injection and aspiration abilities.
The ability is scored as easy, difficult or impossible along the Catheter Injection and Aspiration (CINAS) classification.
|
during the 1 day of TIVAD removal, before the linogram
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Catheter tip position visualization by fluoroscopy
Time Frame: during the 1 day of TIVAD removal, just before the linogram
|
The patient will be positioned in a nearly standing position with chest elevation of 17°
|
during the 1 day of TIVAD removal, just before the linogram
|
|
Port chamber filling, sleeve formation, sleeve extend, catheter tip thrombosis and damage in port chamber or catheter trajectory
Time Frame: during the 1 day of TIVAD removal
|
will be visualised by linogram (digital substraction angiography)
|
during the 1 day of TIVAD removal
|
|
Catheter tip and port chamber culture
Time Frame: during the 1 day of TIVAD removal (following TIVAD removal)
|
microbial culture
|
during the 1 day of TIVAD removal (following TIVAD removal)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-reported outcome measure
Time Frame: during the 1 day of TIVAD removal
|
Patient's experiences will be collected by means of the Leuven Patient Reported Experiences at Port removal (Leuven PREP) questionnaire a self-reported 25-items questionnaire
|
during the 1 day of TIVAD removal
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marguerite Stas, MD, PhD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Brouns F, Schuermans A, Verhaegen J, De Wever I, Stas M. Infection assessment of totally implanted long-term venous access devices. J Vasc Access. 2006 Jan-Mar;7(1):24-8. doi: 10.1177/112972980600700105.
- Goossens GA, Jerome M, Janssens C, Peetermans WE, Fieuws S, Moons P, Verschakelen J, Peerlinck K, Jacquemin M, Stas M. Comparing normal saline versus diluted heparin to lock non-valved totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients: a randomised, non-inferiority, open trial. Ann Oncol. 2013 Jul;24(7):1892-1899. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt114. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
- Odabas H, Ozdemir NY, Ziraman I, Aksoy S, Abali H, Oksuzoglu B, Isik M, Civelek B, Dede D, Zengin N. Effect of port-care frequency on venous port catheter-related complications in cancer patients. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug;19(4):761-6. doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0609-7. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
- Palese A, Baldassar D, Rupil A, Bonanni G, Capellari Maria T, Contessi D, De Crignis L, Vidoni A, Piller Roner S, Zanini A. Maintaining patency in totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD): a time-to-event analysis of different lock irrigation intervals. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Feb;18(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
- Diaz JA, Rai SN, Wu X, Chao JH, Dias AL, Kloecker GH. Phase II Trial on Extending the Maintenance Flushing Interval of Implanted Ports. J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jan;13(1):e22-e28. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.010843. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
- Dal Molin A, Guerretta L, Mazzufero F, Rasero L. The management of totally implanted venous ports in the ambulatory oncologic patient. J Vasc Access. 2009 Jan-Mar;10(1):22-6. doi: 10.1177/112972980901000104.
- Goossens GA. Flushing and Locking of Venous Catheters: Available Evidence and Evidence Deficit. Nurs Res Pract. 2015;2015:985686. doi: 10.1155/2015/985686. Epub 2015 May 14.
- Ferroni A, Gaudin F, Guiffant G, Flaud P, Durussel JJ, Descamps P, Berche P, Nassif X, Merckx J. Pulsative flushing as a strategy to prevent bacterial colonization of vascular access devices. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Nov 7;7:379-83. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S71217. eCollection 2014.
- Gristina AG, Giridhar G, Gabriel BL, Naylor PT, Myrvik QN. Cell biology and molecular mechanisms in artificial device infections. Int J Artif Organs. 1993 Nov;16(11):755-63.
- Douard MC, Arlet G, Longuet P, Troje C, Rouveau M, Ponscarme D, Eurin B. Diagnosis of venous access port-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Nov;29(5):1197-202. doi: 10.1086/313444.
- Tang S, Beigel R, Arsanjani R, Larson B, Luthringer D, Siegel R. Infective Endovascular Fibrin Sheath Vegetations-A New Cause of Bacteremia Detected by Transesophageal Echocardiogram. Am J Med. 2015 Sep;128(9):1029-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
- Onal B, Coskun B, Karabulut R, Ilgit ET, Turkyilmaz Z, Sonmez K. Interventional radiological retrieval of embolized vascular access device fragments. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):87-91. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.4098-10.1. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
- Kojima S, Hiraki T, Gobara H, Iguchi T, Fujiwara H, Matsui Y, Mitsuhashi T, Kanazawa S. Fracture of totally implanted central venous access devices: a propensity-score-matched comparison of risks for Groshong silicone versus polyurethane catheters. J Vasc Access. 2016 Nov 2;17(6):535-541. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000606. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
- Goossens GA, De Waele Y, Jerome M, Fieuws S, Janssens C, Stas M, Moons P. Diagnostic accuracy of the Catheter Injection and Aspiration (CINAS) classification for assessing the function of totally implantable venous access devices. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Feb;24(2):755-761. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2839-x. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
- Bouza E, Martin-Rabadan P, Echenagusia A, Camunez F, Rodriguez-Rosales G, Simo G, Echenagusia M, Guembe M; GEIDI study group. Diagnosis of venous access port colonization requires cultures from multiple sites: should guidelines be amended? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;78(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
- Marcy PY, Dahlet C, Brenet O, Yazbec G, Dubois PY, Salm B, Fouche Y, Mari V, Montastruc M, Lebrec N, Ancel B, Paillocher N, Dupoiron D, Rangeard O, Michel C, Chateau Y, Ettaiche M, Ferrero JM, Chamorey E. [Multicenter validation study of a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with and acceptance of totally-implanted central venous access devices]. Bull Cancer. 2015 Apr;102(4):301-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 21. French.
- Goossens GA, Vrebos M, De Wever I, Stas M. Vacutainer filling time through subcutaneous venous access devices. J Vasc Access. 2004 Oct-Dec;5(4):154-60. doi: 10.1177/112972980400500404.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- S62321
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neoplasms
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingRectal Neoplasms | Colon Neoplasms | Metagenome | MicrobiotaChina
-
European Association for Endoscopic SurgeryWithdrawn
-
Moscow Clinical Scientific CenterRecruitingCecal Neoplasms | Colonic Neoplasms MalignantRussian Federation
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteNot yet recruitingPeritoneal CarcinomatosisUnited States
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...RecruitingColonic NeoplasmsChina
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingMalignant Meningioma
-
Joshua PalmerRayzeBio, Inc.RecruitingRecurrent MeningiomaUnited States
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNational Science and Technology CouncilRecruiting
-
Intergroupe Francophone de Cancerologie ThoraciqueRegeneron PharmaceuticalsNot yet recruiting
-
Royal North Shore HospitalNorthern Sydney and Central Coast Area Health ServiceRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Evaluation of the catheter function
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalUnknownPelvic Floor DysfunctionChina
-
Université de Reims Champagne-ArdenneNot yet recruiting
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityCompleted
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoCompletedBrachial Plexus Injury | Respiratory EvaluationBrazil
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
University of SalamancaCompleted
-
Rennes University HospitalCompletedCardiac Resynchronization TherapyFrance
-
Izmir Bakircay UniversityIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Completed
-
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa CentralCompletedHypertension | Diastolic DysfunctionPortugal