Comparison of CIMT vs Mirror Therapy Effect in Infarcted CVA Patients for Improving Hand Functions

May 25, 2024 updated by: Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University
CIMT vs Mirror therapy for improving hand function in infarcted CVA patients. Randomized clinical trial study design will be followed. Data will be collected from following centers: Minhaj Physiotherapy Centre, Home visits, Sughra sidiq trust hospital, Ibad hospital Samundri. Probability Random Sampling is used.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Minhaj Physiotherapy, opp Shalimar Hospital , Shalimar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infarcted CVA patients
  • Patients with hand improvement needed
  • Patients in recovery stage of stroke from 2 months to 1 year
  • Patients who can participate in 45 mins of session

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hand function disturbed due to any other reason except infarcted CVA, - - - Patients with shoulder subluxation and upper limb contractures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy
patient's unaffected hand is tied with a triangular bandage or splint and the patient asks to perform the exercise through the affected hand. for up to 6 hours a day for 5days week /4 weeks and the patient nonparetic arm restrained from the use by having the patient placing a mitt on the hand or a sling on the unaffected hand, forcing the use of the affected limb to promote purposeful movements when performing functional tasks.
Active Comparator: Mirror Therapy
In this group training was given for 45min a day for 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Mirror box which was of 18×24inch [was placed on the learning table and exercises were carried out by the patient looking into the mirror where an unaffected limb is placed in front of the mirror, through looking into the mirror patient assumes the reflection of the unaffected limb as the paretic limb. Exercises performed were hand opening and closing, wrist extension and flexion, squeezing, opposition, the calculation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
Time Frame: 12 Months
it is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index.Scale items are scored on the basis of ability to complete the item using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially and 2=performs fully
12 Months
The Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI)
Time Frame: 12 months
It is used to assess functional ability of the paretic arm and hand. This test consists of 13 functional tasks: open a jar of coffee, draw a line with a ruler, put toothpaste on a toothbrush, cut medium consistency putty,pour a glass of water wring out a washcloth,clean a pair of eyeglasses,zip up a zipper,botton up 5 buttons,dry back with a towel,place a container on a table and carry a bag up the stairs.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MSRSW/Batch-Fall22/720

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infected Joint

Clinical Trials on Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

Subscribe