Regenerative Endodontic Therapy (RET) for the Management of Immature Non-vital Permanent Teeth in Children

October 13, 2021 updated by: Tong Huei Jinn, National University Health System, Singapore

Regenerative Endodontic Therapy (RET) Using Antibiotic Pastes or Calcium Hydroxide Disinfection for the Management of Immature Non-vital Permanent Teeth in Children: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

This study evaluates the efficacy of Antibiotic pastes or Calcium hydroxide disinfection on healing of periapical pathology and continued root development of infected non-vital immature permanent teeth in children.

In the test group regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) is performed with antibiotics as the disinfecting agent, in the control group RET is performed with Calcium Hydroxide as the disinfecting agent.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • National University Hospital
      • Singapore, Singapore, 168937
        • School Dental Service, Health Promotion Board

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 16 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 6-16 years of age
  2. Patients who are fit and healthy or with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 or ASA 2 medical conditions
  3. Patients with cooperation level that would allow treatment under local analgesia, application of rubber dam isolation and taking of intraoral radiographs.
  4. Patients with permanent premolars that have incomplete root formation with an open apex of greater than 1mm width as observed radiographically and of single root canal morphology (22)
  5. Patients with single rooted immature permanent premolars having one of the following pulpal and periapical diagnosis:

    a. Pulpal i. Necrotic pulp ii. Symptomatic and inflamed pulp not expected to heal. During attempted Cvek or cervical pulpotomy procedures, if the pulpal bleeding does not stop with direct pressure within 5 minutes, pulpectomy will be carried out and the patient will be recruited for RET procedures.

    b. Periapical i. Symptomatic apical periodontitis (with or without a radiographic apical lesion) ii. Asymptomatic apical periodontitis (with a radiographic apical lesion) iii. Acute apical abscess iv. Chronic apical abscess Teeth will be deemed non-vital if either are non-responsive to sensibility tests (i.e. Electric Pulp test and cold tests), and/or present with signs and symptoms of non-vitality (e.g. swelling and abscess).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged > 16 years of age.
  2. Patient with known allergies to Ciprofloxacin (or any fluoroquinolones class of antibiotics) or metronidazole antibiotics.
  3. Patients with medical conditions and/or receiving medications that would affect:

    1. Their body's ability to heal e.g. Diabetes; or
    2. Their ability to clot efficiently, e.g. Haemophilia
  4. Patients with risk of developing infective endocarditis or immune compromised patients.
  5. Patients with non-vital permanent premolars where root development is already deemed to be completed (i.e. foramen size of 0-1.0mm diameter as determined radiographically).
  6. Impacted or horizontally tilted teeth.
  7. Concurrent signs of irreversible pathological root resorption determined radiographically, e.g replacement or internal root resorption, which could otherwise affect the prognosis of the tooth.
  8. Uncooperative patients, or those unable to cope with treatment under local anaesthesia, rubber dam isolation and taking of intraoral radiographs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: RET using bi-Antibiotics
Interventions: Bi-antibiotics (Ciprofloxacin and Metronidazole) placed into the root canal during first treatment stage (disinfection stage)
RET using antibiotics Ciprofloxacin and Metronidazole. First Treatment Visit: Local analgesic, tooth isolation, access, pulp extirpation and root canal irrigation with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite. Canal drying using paper points. Delivery of mixture of Bi antibiotic paste (Ciprofloxacin and Metronidazole with sterile water). Tooth access sealed with temporary dressing. Second Treatment Visit: Tooth analgesia using plain local analgesics without vasoconstriction, isolation and re-access as described above. Irrigation of root canal system using sodium hypochlorite followed by paper point drying. Initiation of bleeding through insertion of a sterile k-file at a length of 2-3 mm beyond the working length into the periapical tissues. Access sealed using resorbable plug, Biodentine, followed by composite resin.
Other Names:
  • Bi-Antibiotics
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: RET using non-setting Calcium Hydroxide
Interventions: non-setting calcium hydroxide placed into the root canal during first treatment stage (disinfection stage)
First Treatment Visit: Local analgesic, Tooth isolation, access, pulp extirpation and root canal irrigation with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite. Canal negotiation, canal drying using paper points. Delivery of the non-setting Calcium Hydroxide. Tooth access sealed with temporary dressing. Second Treatment Visit: Tooth analgesia using plain local analgesics without vasoconstrictor, isolation and re-access as described above. Irrigation of root canal system using sodium hypochlorite followed by paper point drying. Initiation of bleeding through insertion of a sterile k-file at a length of 2-3 mm beyond the working length into the periapical tissues. Access sealed using resorbable plug, Biodentine, followed by composite resin.
Other Names:
  • Calcium hydroxide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution periapical radiolucency (Clinical evaluation)
Time Frame: 18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Clinical evaluation: Presence/Absence of clinical signs of pain and soft tissue pathology (e.g. abscess, sinus tract etc.)
18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Resolution periapical radiolucency (Radiographic evaluation)
Time Frame: 18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Size of periapical lesion will be graded using Periapical Index (PAI)
18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continued root development (Radiographic evaluation)
Time Frame: 18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Quantitative outcomes of lengths and thickness will be measured in millimeters (mm).
18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Discolouration of tooth
Time Frame: 18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Changes in tooth colour will be measured through assessment of photographs
18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Patient reported outcomes (Perceived oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL))
Time Frame: 18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Oral health related quality of life will be evaluated using the validated questionnaire Child-Oral Impacts on daily performances (C-OIDP)
18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)
Patient reported outcomes (Quantitative pain rating)
Time Frame: 18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)

Quantitative pain rating will be done using Faces Pain scale for children 12 years and below; and Numeric Rating scale (NRS) for children 13 years and above.

Faces Pain Scale (range: 0-10); higher scores indicate worse pain

Numeric Rating scale (range: 0-10; 0 - no pain, 1-3 - mild pain, 4-6 - moderate pain, 7-10 - severe pain); higher scores indicate worse pain

18 months (reviews are at periodicity of 3 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Huei Jinn Tong, National University Health System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infected Immature Permanent Teeth

Clinical Trials on RET using antibiotics (Ciprofloxacin and Metronidazole)

3
Subscribe