Impact of Intraoperative ICG on Functional Outc in RARP

February 27, 2026 updated by: David Inkoo Lee, University of California, Irvine

Impact of Intraoperative ICG Use During Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Functional Outcomes

This is a pilot, 3 phases open-label feasibility study with the 3rd phase consisting of randomized 2-arm intervention trial, to assess the systematic use of indocyanine green (ICG) in subjects with prostate adenocarcinoma during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on sexual function outcomes at 12 months postoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The first phase of this study will involve performing 50 cases of nerve-sparing RARP on patients who are good candidates for nerve sparing. During these procedures, we will record the location and size of arteries encountered to create a detailed 3D map of the surgical arterial vasculature.

In the second phase, we will recruit another 50 patients. These patients will receive an IV injection of ICG before encountering the arteries to visualize them prior to resection. This phase will determine the optimal dosage and timing for the IV ICG injection.

The third phase will utilize the dosage and timing defined in the second phase. This phase will be a randomized trial involving 300 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California, Irvine
  • Phone Number: 1-877-827-8839
  • Email: ucstudy@uci.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: University of California Irvine Medical

Study Locations

    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Recruiting
        • Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California, Irvine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Subjects must be ≥18 years old and male.
  • 2. Histologically/pathologically confirmed localized prostate adenocarcinoma.
  • 3. Most recent preoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score ≥10.
  • 4. Subjects who are candidates for good nerve sparing preoperatively determined by the investigator by assessing imaging findings.
  • 5. Ability to read, write and understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent.
  • 6. Subjects must pass medical clearance from primary care provider and cardiologist, if applicable.
  • 7. Subject must be determined to be medical fit for RARP by the investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. No locally advanced or metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma.
  • 2. Preoperative diagnosis of erectile dysfunction with any use of invasive interventions such as intrapenile injections and intrapenile prosthesis implants. Oral interventions are acceptable and are not exclusionary.
  • 3. Received neoadjuvant treatment for high-risk prostate cancer or received prior focal treatment of the prostate or prior definitive radiotherapy.
  • 4. History of allergic reactions or hypersensitivity attributed to iodide compounds, ICG, or any component of ICG.
  • 5. Subjects who are preoperatively not foreseen as ideal candidates for nerve sparing interventions by the investigator.
  • 6. Subjects who are unable to comply with study and follow-up procedures as judged by the investigator.
  • 7. Subjects who are illiterate.
  • 8. Other serious, uncontrolled concomitant diseases that may affect protocol compliance or interpretation of outcomes, including active opportunistic infections or advanced (severe) infections, or uncontrolled diabetes.
  • 9. Any other disease, metabolic disorder, or abnormal finding upon physical examination or laboratory examination that makes the subject unsuitable for receiving the intervention, affects the interpretation of study outcomes, or poses risks to subject safety, as determined by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: SOC group
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy will be performed as a standard procedure.
Experimental: ICG group
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy using ICG
Administer an IV ICG injection intraoperatively, using the optimal dosage and timing defined in the second phase of the study. Utilize the newly developed 3D vascular map for visualization of the arteries before and after prostate resection.
Other Names:
  • Indocyanine Green

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continence Rate at 3 month Post-surgery
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of patients who report using no pads or only 1 security pad per day at 3-month post-surgery.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Reported Continence and Sexual Functions
Time Frame: 12 months

Subjects will complete the investigator-developed, "Follow Up Continence And Sexual Function" questionnaires. This questionnaire includes questions typically asked in Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) surveys and assesses postoperative functional outcomes such as urinary continence/leakage, daily pad usage, sexual function such as percentage fullness of erection and postoperative.

The scales used are the:

  • Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), with a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 25. A higher score indicates a better outcome, and
  • the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum of 35. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Lee, MD, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on ICG

Subscribe