COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIRECT PULP CAPPING AND COMPLETE PULPOTOMY IN MATURE PERMANENT MANDIBULAR MOLARS WITH CLINICAL SIGNS INDICATIVE OF MODERATE PULPITIS

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIRECT PULP CAPPING AND COMPLETE PULPOTOMY IN MATURE PERMANENT MANDIBULAR MOLARS WITH CLINICAL SIGNS INDICATIVE OF MODERATE PULPITIS: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Title: Comparative evaluation of direct pulp capping and complete pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular molars with clinical signs indicative of moderate pulpitis: Randomized Clinical Trial

Rationale: According to new Wolters pulpal clinical classification, Moderate pulpitis exhibit symptoms of prolonged reaction to cold, which can last for minutes, possibly percussion sensitive and spontaneous dull pain which are correspond to irreversible pulpitis.

Complete/partial pulpotomy are suggested to be the choice of treatment for such cases. It has been suggested that infection is often the cause of inflammation, an inflamed pulp should be able to heal if the source of infection is eliminated as in other body organs. Removal of trigger (i.e. caries) followed by application of biocompatible material which makes a good seal in a sterile environment has potential to allow for recovery and healing of the inflamed pulp tissue which is thought to be beyond recovery. Based on this premise, DPC can be considered as minimally invasive approach for the management of teeth with inflamed pulps in place of the conventional approach of partial/complete pulpotomy in adults

Research Question Does Direct Pulp Capping have comparable outcome with complete pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with clinical signs indicative of moderate pulpitis?

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Rationale: Vital pulp therapy has been traditionally recommended only in teeth with reversible pulpitis with no periapical pathologies or in teeth with either mechanical pulp exposure or recent traumatic exposure. Clinical symptoms such as characteristic, severity and intensity of pre-operative pain do not accurately talk about the status of the pulp inflammation and the depth of involvement. It has been demonstrated that there is no precise correlation between clinical symptoms and the histopathological status of the pulp, mainly in case of irreversible pulpitis, that might lead to a wrong diagnosis. Vitality tests such as cold test or electric pulp tests reveal only whether the pulp is responsive to respective stimuli or not. According to new Wolters pulpal clinical classification, Moderate pulpitis exhibit symptoms of prolonged reaction to cold, which can last for minutes, possibly percussion sensitive and spontaneous dull pain which are correspond to irreversible pulpitis.

Complete/partial pulpotomy are suggested to be the choice of treatment for such cases. It has been suggested that infection is often the cause of inflammation, an inflamed pulp should be able to heal if the source of infection is eliminated as in other body organs. Removal of trigger (i.e. caries) followed by application of biocompatible material which makes a good seal in a sterile environment has potential to allow for recovery and healing of the inflamed pulp tissue which is thought to be beyond recovery. Based on this premise, DPC can be considered as minimally invasive approach for the management of teeth with inflamed pulps in place of the conventional approach of partial/complete pulpotomy in adults

Aim: To compare the outcome of direct pulp capping and complete pulpotomy in mature mandibular permanent molars with clinical signs indicative of moderate pulpitis.

Objectives:

  1. To evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of direct pulp capping in mature permanent molars with clinical signs indicative of moderate pulpitis.
  2. To evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of complete pulpotomy in mature permanent molars with clinical signs indicative of moderate pulpitis.
  3. To evaluate pain incidence and severity after direct pulp capping and complete pulpotomy in mature permanent molars with clinical signs indicative of moderate pulpitis

P (Population) - Mature Permanent Mandibular molars with clinical signs of moderate pulpitis I (Intervention) -Direct pulp capping C (Comparison) - Complete pulpotomy O (Outcome) - Assessment of clinical and radiographic success at 12 months follow up.

  • To assess incidence and reduction in pain post operatively at every 24 hours till 1 week

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Haryana
      • Rohtak, Haryana, India, 124001

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. The patient should be ≥18 years of age. 2. Restorable mature permanent 1 st and 2nd Mandibular molars with extremely deep caries (≥2/3 dentine involvement) 3. Tooth should give positive response to pulp sensibility testing. 4. Clinical diagnosis of moderate pulpitis. 5. Radiographic finding of periapical index (PAI) score ≤2. 6. Healthy periodontium (probing pocket depth ≤3 mm and mobility within normal limit).

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Teeth with immature roots.
  2. No pulp exposure after caries excavation.
  3. Bleeding could not be controlled in 6 minutes.
  4. Signs of pulpal necrosis, sinus tract, swelling, insufficient bleeding after pulp exposure.
  5. History of analgesic intake in previous 1 week, or antibiotic intake in 1 month.
  6. Internal/external resorption.
  7. Contributory medical history (alcoholism, smokers, diabetic, hypertension, drug dependency, Heart or valve disease, hepatitis, herpes, immunodeficiency (HIV), infectious diseases, kidney or liver, migraine) -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Direct pulp capping
after caries excavation, the pulp will be inspected visually. If bleeding present, sterile cotton soaked in 3% NaOCl will be placed over the pulpal wound for 2 minutes, repeated for up to 6 min if required. Cases in which bleeding will not stop within 6 minutes will be excluded from the study and further managed by RCT. The exposed pulp will be capped with MTA which will be freshly mixed according to manufacturer's instructions and placed in thickness of 2 to 3 mm over the pulp exposure site using an amalgam carrier following which the cavity floor will be dabbed with moist sterile cotton pellet to ensure the setting of MTA, followed by application of a layer of light-cure RMGIC over MTA and light-curing for 20s. Then tooth will be restored using composite resin following etch and rinse technique.
Active Comparator: Complete pulpotomy
exposed pulp tissue will be amputated using fresh sterile large round diamond bur in a high-speed hand-piece under water coolant 28to the level of canal orifices. The pulp wound will be irrigated with 3% NaOCl. For hemostasis, sterile cotton soaked in 3% NaOCl will be placed over the pulpal wound for 2 minutes, repeated for up to 6 min if required. Root canal therapy will be initiated in cases in which haemostasis is not achieved within 6 minutes. After hemostasis, ProRoot MTA will be placed in thickness of 2 to 3 mm over the pulp exposure site using an amalgam carrier. After placement, the cavity floor will be dabbed with moist sterile cotton pellet to ensure the setting of MTA, followed by application of a layer of light-cure RMGIC over MTA and light-curing for 20s. The tooth then will be restored using composite resin following etch and rinse technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical and radiographic success
Time Frame: 12 months

Clinical success criteria No history of spontaneous pain or discomfort except for the initial days after treatment.

No tenderness to palpation or percussion and the tooth is functional. Normal mobility and probing pocket depth. Soft tissues around tooth are normal with no swelling or sinus tract. Radiographic success criteria No pathosis evident on the radiograph such as root resorption, furcal pathosis or new periapical pathosis. Periapical Index score 1 or 2 according to Orstavic6 et al.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain incidence and reduction
Time Frame: 7 days

Patients will be informed that they may experience pain in the days after treatment and will be instructed to record their pain at 24 h, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days after the treatment, to be submitted after 1 week. They will be instructed to use analgesics (Ibuprofen 400 mg every 6-8 h), if needed for pain relief. They will be requested to note down the details of analgesic intake on the pain form regarding the number of doses required, timing of the dose and whether it provided adequate pain relief or not (yes/no). 29 Visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 will be used to record preoperative and post

-operative pain.

7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sanjay Tewari, MDS, PGIDS Rohtak

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Sakshi

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Moderate Pulpitis

Clinical Trials on Direct pulp capping

Subscribe