- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06451341
IMplementation of CAB+RPV LA for People With HIV in Non-Metropolitan Areas (IM-CAPABLE)
IMplementation of CAB+RPV LA for People With HIV in Non-Metropolitan Areas: Addressing Adherence Barriers Through Learning and Evidence-Informed Strategies (IM-CAPABLE)
The goal of this implementation science study is to learn about the experience of receiving and providing cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting (CAB+RPV LA) injections as treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) for people who live a significant distance from an HIV provider. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is CAB+RPV LA feasible and acceptable to patients and staff?
- What barriers and supports exist and have the most impact on receiving and providing CAB+RPV LA?
- How does CAB+RPV LA affect HIV stigma, treatment satisfaction, medication adherence and viral suppression?
People living with HIV who reside outside of the Omaha, Nebraska metro area and are starting CAB+RPV LA as part of regular medical care for HIV will be invited to participate in this study which involves completing questionnaires and an interview over 15 months. Clinic staff who are involved in providing HIV care and CAB+RPV LA will also provide input through questionnaires and an interview.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Behavioral: Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
- Behavioral: Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
- Behavioral: Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
- Behavioral: HIV Stigma Scale Questionnaire
- Behavioral: HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (HIVTSQs12)
- Behavioral: HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (HIVTSQc12)
- Behavioral: Needs and Barriers Assessment
- Behavioral: Pre-visit Outreach
- Behavioral: Qualitative interview
- Behavioral: Staff education
- Behavioral: Staff Month 7 and 15 Survey - Staff Burden and Engagement
Detailed Description
The UNMC Specialty Care Center (SCC) in Omaha, Nebraska is the only dedicated HIV care facility in the region and serves patients from across the state of Nebraska as well as southwest Iowa. It also provides the sole comprehensive CAB+RPV LA program in the area with highly trained staff, established protocols and workflows for drug acquisition, and more than 75 patients receiving CAB+RPV LA to date.
Although individuals who have transitioned to this new treatment modality report many benefits, including relief at not taking a daily pill (often seen as an unwanted daily reminder of HIV infection), some individuals still face barriers to access this treatment, which must be administered in a medical facility on a monthly or every two month dosing schedule.
For the patients of the UNMC Specialty Care Center (SCC) who live in 79 rural counties in central and eastern Nebraska and 11 counties in Southwest Iowa, some extra barriers might include transportation, bad weather, time away from work to travel, and privacy concerns surrounding receipt of injections. In an effort to improve access, the SCC has partnered with the Nebraska Medicine Internal Medicine Clinic in Grand Island, Nebraska (a rural facility located approximately 150 miles from Omaha) to provide a satellite location for patients to receive CAB+RPV LA injections.
The IM-CAPABLE study aims to evaluate this partnership and the best ways to provide CAB+RPV LA to patients who live a significant distance from an HIV provider and/or live in rural areas. People living with HIV who reside outside of the Omaha, Nebraska metro area and are starting CAB+RPV LA as part of regular medical care for HIV will be invited to participate in this study which involves completing questionnaires and an interview over 15 months. Clinic staff who are involved in providing HIV care and CAB+RPV LA will also provide input through questionnaires and an interview.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Nebraska
-
Grand Island, Nebraska, United States, 68803
- Nebraska Medicine Grand Island Clinic
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68106
- University of Nebraska Specialty Care Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
HIV+ patients at the University of Nebraska Medical Center Specialty Care Clinic (UNMC SCC) who reside outside the Omaha metropolitan area and/or in rural areas who meet eligibility criteria. They are identified through the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) registry.
Clinical staff involved in HIV care at either UNMC SCC or at Nebraska Medicine Grand Island Clinic who meet eligibility criteria. They will be contacted by email or phone for possible participation.
Description
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 19 years old (as per Nebraska's adult age definition) with documented HIV infection
- Receiving care for the management of HIV disease by a provider at the Nebraska Medicine/UNMC Specialty Care Center ( UNMC SCC)
- Deemed a clinically eligible candidate for CAB+RPV LA per HIV treatment guidelines and through shared medical decision-making by provider and patient
- Resides outside of the Omaha, Nebraska metropolitan area
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
- Does not meet the clinical guidelines eligibility criteria for CAB+RPV LA
- Currently receiving CAB+RPV LA
- Currently incarcerated
- Unable to give informed consent for participation
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period
- Intends to move from their current residence to the Omaha metropolitan area or intend to move out of the Specialty Care Center service area within 12 months after enrollment
Staff Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 19 years old (as per Nebraska's adult age definition)
- Staff member of the UNMC SCC or the Grand Island clinic who is providing HIV-related care to patients and has a dedicated role in the IM-CAPABLE study
- Able to provide written and/or oral feedback as outlined in the implementation method
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Staff
Staff at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Specialty Care Center or the Nebraska Medicine Grand Island clinic who provide HIV-related care and are involved in this study.
|
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) questionnaire will be administered at Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15 to patient and staff participants. This is a four-item validated measure of implementation outcomes that is often considered a "leading indicator" of implementation success. The AIM will measure the extent to which participants believe CAB+RPV LA implementation is acceptable. The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) questionnaire will be administered at Baseline to patient and staff participants. This is a four-item validated measure of implementation outcomes that is often considered a "leading indicator" of implementation success. The IAM will measure the extent to which participants believe CAB+RPV LA implementation is appropriate. The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) questionnaire will be administered at Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15 to patient and staff participants. This is a four-item validated measure of implementation outcomes that is often considered a "leading indicator" of implementation success. The FIM will measure the extent to which participants believe CAB+RPV LA implementation is feasible.
Qualitative interviews will be conducted within thirty days after study completion at Month 15 to further evaluate the participant's experience with the implementation of CAB+RPV LA treatment.
Staff participants will participate in Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Project ECHO) educational sessions with topics such as fundamentals of HIV treatment and care, HIV outcomes, delivery of antiretroviral therapies (ART) including long-acting ART, cultural sensitivity, and social determinants of health in rural areas.
The Staff Burden and Engagement survey is a questionnaire designed to assess staff participant perceptions of engagement, burden, facilitators, barriers, communication, resources and challenges related to the implementation of long-acting injectable therapy at their clinic.
This will be administered at Month 7 and Month 15.
|
|
Participants
Participants receiving care at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Specialty Care Center who live outside of the Omaha metropolitan area and who choose to start CAB+RPV LA as part of clinical care.
|
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) questionnaire will be administered at Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15 to patient and staff participants. This is a four-item validated measure of implementation outcomes that is often considered a "leading indicator" of implementation success. The AIM will measure the extent to which participants believe CAB+RPV LA implementation is acceptable. The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) questionnaire will be administered at Baseline to patient and staff participants. This is a four-item validated measure of implementation outcomes that is often considered a "leading indicator" of implementation success. The IAM will measure the extent to which participants believe CAB+RPV LA implementation is appropriate. The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) questionnaire will be administered at Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15 to patient and staff participants. This is a four-item validated measure of implementation outcomes that is often considered a "leading indicator" of implementation success. The FIM will measure the extent to which participants believe CAB+RPV LA implementation is feasible. The HIV Stigma Scale Questionnaire used in this study is a shortened version of the validated 40-item HIV stigma scale. This 12-item questionnaire measures the same four stigma subscales measured in the original version, for a streamlined approach to collecting this data on personalized stigma, disclosure concerns, concerns with public attitudes and negative self-image. This will be administered at Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15. The HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed to evaluate treatments for HIV and patient satisfaction. The original 10 item HIVTSQ, which underwent two stages of psychometric validation, has been adapted to include questions regarding injectable treatment for HIV. Two versions of the HIVTSQ are being used. The status version (HIVTSQs12) will assess change in treatment satisfaction over time, and the change version (HIVTSQc12) will assess the change in treatment satisfaction between a patient participant's previous and current treatment. The status version will be administered at Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15. The HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed to evaluate treatments for HIV and patient satisfaction. The original 10 item HIVTSQ, which underwent two stages of psychometric validation, has been adapted to include questions regarding injectable treatment for HIV. Two versions of the HIVTSQ are being used. The status version (HIVTSQs12) will assess change in treatment satisfaction over time, and the change version (HIVTSQc12) will assess the change in treatment satisfaction between a patient participant's previous and current treatment. The change version will be administered at Month 15. The Needs and Barriers Assessment is a questionnaire designed to assess patient participant barriers and social determinants of health, emotional challenges related to antiretroviral therapy, and the impact of switching to CAB+RPV LA treatment. This will be administered at Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15.
Patient participants will be contacted prior to each clinical injection visit for an appointment reminder and a needs assessment.
Qualitative interviews will be conducted within thirty days after study completion at Month 15 to further evaluate the participant's experience with the implementation of CAB+RPV LA treatment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient participants determination of acceptability of CAB+RPV LA implementation
Time Frame: 15 months (baseline, month 7 & month 15)
|
Proportion of patient participants that agree/completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the acceptability of CAB+RPV LA implementation on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) questionnaire (4-item measure of perceived intervention acceptability measured on a Likert scale (1-Completely Disagree to 5-Completely Agree).
Score is calculated mean.
|
15 months (baseline, month 7 & month 15)
|
|
Patient participants determination of feasibility of CAB+RPV LA implementation
Time Frame: 15 months (baseline, month 7 & month 15)
|
Proportion of patient participants that agree/completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the acceptability of CAB+RPV LA implementation on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) questionnaire (4-item measure of perceived intervention acceptability measured on a Likert scale (1-Completely Disagree to 5-Completely Agree).
Score is calculated mean.
|
15 months (baseline, month 7 & month 15)
|
|
Staff participants determination of the acceptability of CAB+RPV LA implementation
Time Frame: 15 months (baseline, month 7 & month 15)
|
Proportion of staff participants that agree/completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the acceptability of CAB+RPV LA implementation on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) questionnaire (4-item measure of perceived intervention acceptability measured on a Likert scale (1-Completely Disagree to 5-Completely Agree).
Score is calculated mean.
|
15 months (baseline, month 7 & month 15)
|
|
Staff participants determination of the feasibility of CAB+RPV LA implementation
Time Frame: 15 months (baseline, month 7 & month 15)
|
Proportion of staff participants that agree/completely agree (average score of 4 or higher) on the acceptability of CAB+RPV LA implementation on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) questionnaire (4-item measure of perceived intervention acceptability measured on a Likert scale (1-Completely Disagree to 5-Completely Agree).
Score is calculated mean.
|
15 months (baseline, month 7 & month 15)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Site-specific reach of CAB+RPV LA implementation
Time Frame: 15 months
|
Comparison of the number of patients referred to start CAB+RPV LA to the number of patients who were clinically eligible to start CAB+RPV LA at end of study. This data will be obtained from an electronic medical record generated report indicating the number of patients who meet initial clinical eligibility (virologically suppressed, not pregnant, no Hepatitis B infection, etc). |
15 months
|
|
Virologically suppressed patient participants (plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL)
Time Frame: 15 months (Baseline, Month 1, Month 3, Month 9 and Month 15)
|
Proportion of patient participants who are virologically suppressed (plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL) as a description of the effectiveness of CAB+RPV LA implementation strategies on viral suppression.
Viral load results collected from the electronic medical record for the injection visits.
|
15 months (Baseline, Month 1, Month 3, Month 9 and Month 15)
|
|
Injection Visit Show Rate
Time Frame: 15 months
|
Proportion of patient participants missing clinical injection visits (injection visit show rate collected at the end of study from the electronic medical record for each clinical injection).
|
15 months
|
|
CAB+RPV LA effect on patient participants reported stigma
Time Frame: 15 months (Baseline, Month 7 & Month 15)
|
HIV Stigma Questionnaire (12-item measure of perceived stigma using a 4-point Likert scale: 1-Completely Disagree to 4-Completely Agree; higher scores designate a greater level of perceived HIV-related stigma).
Total score is the summation of item scores.
|
15 months (Baseline, Month 7 & Month 15)
|
|
CAB+RPV LA effect on patient participants reported treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 15 months (Baseline, Month 7 & Month 15)
|
HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (12 items rated using a 7-point Likert scale: 0 - very dissatisfied to 6 -very satisfied).
Higher scores indicate a greater level of satisfaction with HIV treatment.
|
15 months (Baseline, Month 7 & Month 15)
|
|
Patient participants' reported change in treatment satisfaction between previous oral treatment and CAB+RPV LA
Time Frame: Month 15
|
HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (12 items rated using a 7-point Likert scale: -3 - much less satisfied now to 3 -much more satisfied now.)
Higher scores indicate a greater improvement in treatment satisfaction with the new treatment.
|
Month 15
|
|
Reasons for CAB+RPV LA discontinuation
Time Frame: 15 months
|
Collection of reasons from patient participants for discontinuation of CAB+RPV LA will be completed at the end of patient study participation.
|
15 months
|
|
Site-specific barriers for CAB+RPV LA implementation
Time Frame: 16 months
|
Staff Burden and Engagement Survey administered at Month 7 and 15.
Qualitative interviews with staff participants within one month of end of study.
|
16 months
|
|
Site-specific facilitators for CAB+RPV LA implementation
Time Frame: 16 months
|
Staff Burden and Engagement Survey administered at Month 7 and 15.
Qualitative interviews with staff participants within one month of end of study.
|
16 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Describe patient reported barriers to receiving CAB+RPV LA
Time Frame: 15 months (Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15)
|
The Needs and Barriers Assessment is a questionnaire designed to assess patient participant barriers and social determinants of health, emotional challenges related to antiretroviral therapy, and the impact of switching to CAB+RPV LA treatment.
|
15 months (Baseline, Month 7 and Month 15)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nada Fadul, MD, University of Nebraska
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0277-24-EP
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV
-
Duke UniversityGilead SciencesRecruitingHIV Prevention | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis | HIV Prevention Program | HIV Prevention and Care | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis UseUnited States
-
Federal University of São PauloGilead SciencesCompleted
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamMobile County Health Deparment; Alabama Department of Public HealthRecruitingHIV | HIV Testing | HIV Linkage to Care | HIV TreatmentUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingPrEP | HIV | HIV Prevention | PrEP UptakeUnited States
-
Institute of HIV Research and Innovation Foundation...National Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingHIV Prevention | PrEP Adherence | HIV Related StigmaThailand
-
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and...Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationCompletedPartner HIV Testing | Couple HIV Counseling | Couple Communication | HIV IncidenceCameroon, Dominican Republic, Georgia, India
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingFeasibility | HIV Prevention | PrEP Uptake | Acceptability | HIV Self-testing | Male Partners of HIV-negative Postpartum WomenSouth Africa
-
ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesHopital Universitaire Robert-Debre; Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement and other collaboratorsUnknownHIV | HIV-uninfected Children | Children Exposed to HIVCameroon
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of BotswanaRecruitingPregnancy | HIV | Post-partum | HIV Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) AdherenceBotswana
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
-
Queen Mary University of LondonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; Barts & The London NHS Trust; Royal... and other collaboratorsCompletedHuman Immunodeficiency VirusesUnited Kingdom
-
Northwestern UniversityWithdrawnIndividuals at Risk for DepressionUnited States
-
Lille Catholic UniversityNot yet recruitingAdvance Care Planning | Health Services for the AgedFrance
-
St. Jude Children's Research HospitalCompleted
-
Terry L. WahlsRecruitingMultiple Sclerosis | Clinically Isolated Syndrome | Fibromyalgia | Post Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 | Cancer in Remission With Persisting FatigueUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)Pakistan
-
University of SaskatchewanNot yet recruiting
-
Physicians Committee for Responsible MedicineFriends of the Earth; Coalition for Healthy School Food; Chilis on Wheels; Office...RecruitingSchools | Food Acceptance | Acceptance | Soy Milk | New York | Choice | Beverage | Food Waste | Food TastingUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityVisiting Nurse Service of New YorkCompleted