Markers of Favorable Response to Complement Inhibitors Therapy (OPTIMISE)

Identification of Clinical, Biological, Cellular and Genetic Markers of Favorable Response Complement Inhibitors Therapy in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune neurological disease caused by autoantibodies primarily directed against components of the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Approximately 85% of patients have antibodies directed against the acetylcholine receptor (anti-AChR).

Anti-AChR antibodies act through three distinct mechanisms:

  1. Activation of the classical complement pathway: Formation of membrane-attack complexes (MACs) results in the destruction of the postsynaptic membrane.
  2. Mechanical blockade: Anti-AChR antibodies block the acetylcholine binding site on its receptor.
  3. Internalization and lysosomal degradation: Bivalent IgG causes cross-linking of adjacent receptors leading to internalization and degradation of AChRs (antigenic modulation).

Patient mortality has significantly reduced due to effective treatments preventing severe exacerbations of myasthenic symptoms.

In the past five years, the FDA and EMA have approved complement inhibitors for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis with anti-AChR antibody positivity. Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, binds to the complement fragment C5, inhibiting its cleavage into C5a and C5b, and preventing the formation of the terminal complement complex C5b-9 (MAC).

Currently, Eculizumab is approved in Italy for generalized myasthenia gravis associated with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody positivity.

This class of drugs is generally more effective than conventional immunosuppressive therapies, though it comes with higher costs.

There is heterogeneity among patients in their response to complement inhibitor therapies. Currently, there is no specific evidence indicating which patients may benefit most from this class of treatments. Personalized therapy, considering the predominant pathogenic mechanisms of anti-AChR in individual patients, seems necessary. Interindividual heterogeneity in the autoantibody repertoire could underlie different responses to complement inhibitor therapies. For example, inhibition of the complement cascade in patients whose autoantibodies also block receptors might result in an unsatisfactory treatment response. Moreover, C5 gene polymorphisms could explain a lack of response to these new drugs. Investigating the immune, genetic, and cellular profile of myasthenic patients eligible for these new pharmacological therapies could be useful for identifying predictive markers of response and personalizing therapeutic choices.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with generalized Myasthenia Gravis positive for anti-AChR antibodies undergoing therapy with complement inhibitor drugs

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years;
  • Diagnosis of generalized anti-AChR positive Myasthenia Gravis;
  • Need for therapy with complement inhibitor drugs according to the therapeutic indications approved by AIFA (16);
  • Ability to perform follow-up at the reference center;
  • Signed informed consent to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years;
  • Poor compliance with drug therapy;
  • Concomitant autoimmune diseases;
  • Insufficient availability of clinical information;
  • Ongoing neoplasia or infection at the time of biological sample collection;
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent to the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of Clinical Markers of Favorable Response to Complement Inhibitors Therapy in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Time Frame: 24 months
- Analyze the clinical status of patients comparing the results of MG-ADL and QMG clinical scales pre/post complement inhibitors therapy.
24 months
Identification of Biological and Cellular Markers of Favorable Response to Complement Inhibitors Therapy in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Time Frame: 24 months
Analyze the differences between complement proteins pre/post therapy with complement inhibitor drugs.
24 months
Identification of Biological and Cellular Markers of Favorable Response to Complement Inhibitors Therapy in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Time Frame: 24 months
Measure the levels of proteins involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.
24 months
Identification of Genetic Markers of Favorable Response to Complement Inhibitors Therapy in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Time Frame: 24 months
Investigate the presence of polymorphisms in the gene encoding the complement protein C5 in patients refractory to therapy with complement inhibitors.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive algorithm of favorable response
Time Frame: 24 months
Create a predictive algorithm for response to complement inhibitor therapies by combining clinical, cellular, biological, and genetic parameters
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raffaele Iorio, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myasthenia Gravis, Generalized

Subscribe