EMG Biofeedback Training to Improve Balance in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MSBAL)

November 29, 2024 updated by: Aimee Nelson, McMaster University

Integrated Dual-task EMG Biofeedback Balance Training to Improve Balance in Individuals Living with Multiple Sclerosis

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the impact of a novel dual-task EMG Biofeedback training method for improving balance in individuals living with multiple sclerosis. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • Does dual-task EMG biofeedback training deliver lasting balance benefits up to 3 months following the intervention?
  • Are the benefits greater than those for participation in traditional balance training exercises?
  • Do the benefits vary with the severity of disability?

Participants will receive either EMG Biofeedback (EMG-BF) training or traditional balance exercise (BAL-EX) training. Both treatments involve three 30-minute sessions of the training every week for 6 weeks (18 sessions). During the sessions, participants in the EMG-BF treatment group will perform targeted exercises using feedback from adhesive (sticker) sensors on their arms and legs. Participants in the BAL-EX treatment group will following an instructor through balance training movements that are traditionally prescribed by physiotherapists to improve balance. Measurements will be taken at the beginning of the study, after six weeks of training, and three months after the end of training.

Researchers will compare the groups to see if balance and related outcomes are improved more by 6-weeks of EMG-BF training than BAL-EX.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L1
        • Recruiting
        • McMaster University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-80 years with a formal diagnosis of MS.
  • Participants must be ambulatory and report problems with walking and/or balance.
  • Have stable disease with no relapses in the last 3 months.
  • Agreement to not introduce or change the dosage of pharmaceutical treatments during the study period. This includes intramuscular injections (e.g., Botox), intravenous, and orally administered drugs.
  • Agreement to maintain the frequency, duration and intensity of physical therapy or any alternate therapies (e.g., massage, osteopathic, chiropractic, etc.) for the duration of the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to follow instructions due to cognitive deficit or language barrier
  • Presence of visual disorders that prevent meaningful interaction with the intervention interface.
  • Unable to maintain stable pharmaceutical treatment for the duration of the study.
  • Unable to maintain the frequency, duration and intensity of physical therapy or alternate therapies outside of the trial for the duration of the trial.
  • Received Botox treatment within 3 months of the onset of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Integrated Dual-task EMG Biofeedback Training (EMG-BF)

Participants will engage in EMG-BF for 30 minutes 3 times per week for 6 weeks for a total of 18 sessions. Our novel EMG Biofeedback training system can be adapted to a training objective by planning 3 to 5 movements and placing sensors over muscles that must be active when the user adheres to the correct movement form. For our training we use right or left torso shift with knee bend, and right or left hand opening, and place sensors over left and right vastus lateralis and left and right extensor digitorum superficialis muscles.

Each movement corresponds to a specific videogame command. To introduce cognitive challenge, we randomly shuffle the game command assigned to each movement at the beginning of every session. This will require the user to choose the appropriate movement to trigger the intended game input while suppressing incorrect movements. We use the puzzle game, Tetris, which requires spatial reasoning and planning under increasingly tight time constraints.

The intervention is an exercise training that is facilitated by feedback derived from electrical muscle activity measured through electromyography (EMG). An EMG Biofeedback software uses a machine learning algorithm to identify the desired movements and reinforce them by displaying feedback on a computer monitor in the form of videogame control. The EMG acquisition hardware must have at least 4 sensor channels and a sampling rate of >1KHz. Other than these specifications, any generic EMG amplifier can be used. The effect of the "device" is therefore primarily defined by the software. An in-depth description of the software and hardware systems is published in the cites study, "An EMG-Based Biofeedback System for Tailored Interventions Involving Distributed Muscles". In this trail is the Explore+ ExG amplifier which is sold by Mentalab.
Active Comparator: Traditional Balance Exercise Training (BAL-EX)
Participants will perform 7 balance exercises traditionally prescribed by physiotherapists. The first is a heel/toe square exercise where the trainee lifts their right toe and left heel, then their left toe and right heel, then both heels, then both toes. The 2nd exercise involves maintaining tandem stance while static, then moving the arms, then looking up and down, then looking left and right. The 3rd exercise is lateral stepping where the individual steps with one foot out to the side and then bring the foot back to the starting stance. The 4th exercise is a golfer's lift where the person slowly leans forward while extending one leg straight behind and touches the seat of a chair placed opposite. The 5th exercise is extended-duration single leg stands and exercises 6 and 7 are back and side leg raises, respectively. The exercise sequence will repeat until 30 minutes has expired. Sessions are repeated 3 times per week for 6 weeks, for 18 sessions.
This intervention is a time-matched active comparator for the EMG-BF intervention. A sequence of seven traditional, balance exercises, taking 1-3 minutes each, is repeated for a total of 30 minutes on each of 18 sessions in the 6-week intervention period. The exercises are ones that challenge the coordination and strength of postural muscles in the presence of various vestibular stimuli. The specific exercises are described in the Arm description.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
Time Frame: It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
A sensitive, reliable, and valid 14-item scale that assesses dynamic balance. It includes components evaluating anticipatory postural adjustments, responses to perturbation, sensory orientation, and dynamic stability during gait. The total score ranges from 0 ("no balance") to 28 ("complete balance").
It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Limits of Stability (LoS)
Time Frame: It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
Assesses the ability of an individual to control the center of pressure (COP) on a force platform within their base of support. Subjects are instructed to move a cursor indicating their COP away from the center of their base of support in all directions using feedback provided on a computer monitor. The feedback includes a representation of the force plate and the COP which paints the area covered by its movements. The goal communicated to the subject is to create the largest coverage area possible without lifting their feet off the plate. Total and quadrant-specific areas (i.e., Total, Front Left, Front Right, Back left, and Back Right) are measured in cm2. These measures are reliable, and published reference values exist.
It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
Sway in Quiet Stance (QS)
Time Frame: It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
Assesses the movement of the participants center of center of pressure (COP) while standing on a force platform with hands on hips. The mean length in cm of the path traveled by the COP during the last 3 of 4 total subsequent 20s trials (one practice trial) is the outcome of interest. The test is repeated with eyes open, and eyes closed. This assessment is valid and reliable.
It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
Timed 25ft Walk Test (T25WT)
Time Frame: It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
Participants start at a line on the floor and are instructed to "walk as quickly as possible but safely" beyond the second line 25 feet away. The time is recorded in seconds beginning with the first heel strike beyond the start line and ending with the first heel strike after the second line, two trials are performed with the faster time used for the analysis. This assessment is valid and reliable.
It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale
Time Frame: It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
A patient-reported questionnaire regarding balance confidence during 16 everyday activities. The ABC scale is quick and easy to administer and has demonstrated good reliability, validity, and sensitivity in MS populations.
It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
12-item Subjective Walking Scale (SWS-12)
Time Frame: It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
A 12-item questionnaire regarding the effect of the respondent's "condition" on their walking in the last two weeks. The questions are adapted from the MS walking scale, which is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
A popular health-related quality of life measure with 36 items, 8 scales, and physical and mental summary measures. The scales are physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), role-emotional (RE), social functioning (SF) and mental health (MH). The summary scores are the physical health composite summary (PCS) and the mental health composite summary (MCS). The SF-36 is valid and reliable.
It will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks of training, and 3 months after the end of training (18 weeks from baseline)
Fall and Near-Fall Frequency
Time Frame: Participant will keep the fall diary from 2 weeks before the first training session to the end of the study, 20 weeks later.
Fall diaries are a simple and effective means to measure falls. Each participant with record falls and near-falls in a calendar by marking "F" or "NF" on the day of a fall. For each fall, participants fill a short form providing information about the cause, any injuries, or hospitalization as the result of the fall.
Participant will keep the fall diary from 2 weeks before the first training session to the end of the study, 20 weeks later.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scales (VAS)
Time Frame: The weekly 3-session average will be assessed for week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. the average across all six weeks (18 sessions) will be assessed.

At the end of every session participants make a vertical mark on a 10-centimeter horizontal line representing a continuum between "Strongly Disagree" (0 cm) and "Strongly Agree" (10 cm). The midpoint of the line (5 cm) represents "Neither Agree nor Disagree". VAS measurements are accurate and precise. Participants will respond to VAS scales with the following prompts:

  • I enjoyed the training.
  • The training was challenging.
  • I put forth a great deal of effort.

The average of VAS values provided in each week (3 sessions per week) of participation, and across the entire 6 weeks of training (18 sessions) will be assessed.

The weekly 3-session average will be assessed for week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. the average across all six weeks (18 sessions) will be assessed.
Enjoyment Scale (ES)
Time Frame: 6 weeks of training.

Participants will respond to 5 statements adapted from a usability questionnaire developed by Ona and colleagues. For each question, responses are provided on a 10-point scale whereby 1 represents 'strongly disagree' and 10 is 'strongly agree'. The response to each statement is summed for a total of out 50.

Statements will include:

  1. The training meets a real need.
  2. The training is intuitive and easy to understand.
  3. I will continue to use the access the training in the future if it is available.
  4. The difficulty of the training was adequate.
  5. The training sessions were enjoyable.
6 weeks of training.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Toepp SL, Mohrenschildt MV, and Nelson AJ. An EMG-Based Biofeedback System for Tailored Interventions Involving Distributed Muscles. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2024; 23(22): 28095-28109.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Integrated Dual-task EMG Biofeedback Training (EMG-BF)

Subscribe