Impact of Simulation Based Learning on Gender, and Equity Dynamics Among Inter-health Professional Teams (Sim-Gender)

Impact of Simulation Based Learning on Gender, and Equity Dynamics Among Interhealth Professionals at Selected Institutions in Sub Saharan Africa

At Mbarara University of Science and Technology and partner sites, the investigators will explore the role of simulation in gender and equity. African societies are largely patriarchal, and this spills over into professional practice and medical education. Simulation methodology is at risk of suffering from a patriarchal dominance. The male dominance has potential to introduce power relationships between men and women learners in a scenario setting and between physicians and nurses. In the presence of such power differentials, the less dominant party could develop a "culture of silence," fail to take decisions on issues that affect them or their patients, fail to talk about these issues and take appropriate action.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To address the challenges of gender and equity: 1) the investigators will teach Advocacy Inquiry (AI) and the ladder of inference (LoI) as conversational strategies for all simulation faculty members to explore participant frames of action and thought processes, 2) the investigators will design and expose participants to simulated scenarios with embedded gender and or inter-professional power differentials, 3) study the effect of AI, the LoI and debriefed gender and equity scenarios on participant engagement strategies during gender and inter-professional conflict situations.

The Ladder of Influence allows facilitators select some data / observation, add interpretation, draw conclusions and take action. Though the Ladder of influence is a powerful approach to exploring situations, its prone to challenges if users jump to conclusions quickly without being curious about what alternative interpretations of the observed data / action could be. AI uses the "show", "think" and "wonder" as a strategy to slow facilitators from jumping up the LoI to draw conclusions before exploring learner perspectives. AI and the LoI in combination encourage self-reflection and good judgment. The investigators will deliberately encourage simulation teams to have both males and females and inter-professional with opportunities for team leaders to vary with both sex and profession.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Francis Bajunirwe, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 0772 576 396
  • Email: fbaj@must.ac.ug

Study Locations

      • Mbarara, Uganda
        • Recruiting
        • Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Medical students, faculty members involved in delivery of scenario execution

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical students
  • Faculty members in the Faculty of Medicine
  • Based at Mbarara University, Lira University, Busitema University, or Muni University

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical students and faculty outside the participating Universities
  • Non-medical students
  • Faculty not based in the Faculties of Medicine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gender and inter-professional conflicts in simulation
Time Frame: Change in conflicts 24 months after introduction of simulation based techniques
Frequency of gender and inter-professional conflicts reported in simulation session and or clinical care spaces during debriefing sessions
Change in conflicts 24 months after introduction of simulation based techniques

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020/MUST-3/SIM-II

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will not be shared given the private nature (involves videos)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Simulation-based Methodology

Clinical Trials on Simulation based learning with Advocacy inquiry and ladder of influence

3
Subscribe