Effectiveness of Neurodinamic Techniques on Radial Nerve for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia (TT-ST-RN-LE)

June 21, 2024 updated by: MARIA BALSA AMARANTE, University of Alcala

Effectiveness of 'Tensioning Techniques' vs 'Sliding Techniques' on Radial Nerve for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia

Lateral elbow pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder in the working population due to overuse of the upper limb. This pathology has serious consequences for health, work performance and overall health burden.

In this injury, as in any musculoskeletal disorder, the peripheral nervous system is involved. Because of its course and corresponding motor and sensory innervation in the area, the radial nerve should be taken into consideration as a structure involved in elbow pain.

The aim of the present study is to demonstrate which of the neurodynamic techniques is more effective in lateral epicondylalgia, neural tension techniques or neural mobilization techniques.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the present study is to demonstrate which is more effective among the neurodynamic techniques for lateral epicondylalgia, neural tension techniques or neural mobilization techniques.

A total of 60 subjects will be recruited and divided into 2 groups. 30 in Group 1 where they will receive a neural mobilization technique on the radial nerve and 30 in Group 2 where they will be subjected to a neural tension technique on the radial nerve.

The data to be collected will be grip strength, pain on pressure, pain and quality of life dash questionnaire, these data will be measured pre, post treatment and a re-evaluation at 4 weeks and 24 weeks after the intervention.

The duration of the treatment is 6 weeks, performing two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Campus Científico Tecnológico. Av. de León. 3A
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • María Balsa Amarante, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient diagnosed with lateral epicondylalgia.
  • Experiencing elbow pain of 2 to 6 months duration.
  • Age between 30 and 60 years old.
  • Radial humeral joint tenderness to palpation.
  • Positive Cozen's test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Bilateral symptoms.
  • Rheumatologic disease involving the elbow and wrist
  • Musculoskeletal disorder due to connective tissue pathology
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Nerve compression including the upper extremity
  • Operation on the affected arm
  • Having received treatment for epicondylalgia in the last 6 months
  • Radiating pain from the cervical spine
  • Instability of the external ligamentous complex of the elbow(3).
  • Not having received any physiotherapy session in the month prior to the start of the study.
  • Neural clinical manifestations (electric shock-like pain, tingling, tingling, numbness and/or burning).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GRUPO 1
a Neural tension technique on the radial nerve will be performed.
the neural group tensioning technique: The test should be performed in approximately 10° of shoulder abduction. The examiner extends the elbow 2 seconds just to the range where the patient notices tension but no pain and then the elbow is flexed. Three sets of 6-8 swings are performed with 1 minute rest in between.
Experimental: GRUPO 2
A neural gliding technique will be performed on the radial nerve.
The mobilization maneuver begins by identifying the first resistance and the range of extension associated with pain. Maintaining elbow extension within the elastic region of resistance free of pain and/or paresthesia the examiner increases elbow extension and simultaneously allows the wrist to extend as necessary for the radial nerve branches in the forearm to glide proximally. The physical therapist then flexes the wrist while allowing the elbow to flex to cause the radial nerve excursion distally in the forearm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip strength
Time Frame: the duration of the program will be 6 weeks, with two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out. A re-evaluation will be done 4 weeks after the final evaluation and another one after 24 weeks.
his is a continuous quantitative variable. The measurement of grip strength is performed with the subject in a chair with backrest and armrests, his shoulder is in neutral position, and in adduction; the elbow in 90º flexion and the wrist in 30º extension. Participants are asked to perform maximal grip strength with the dynamometer in a self-selected grip position for 6 seconds. According to the American Society of Hand Therapists Guide, a Jamar® hydraulic dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument Company, USA) is used. The measurements were repeated 3 times, with an interval of 1 minute and the mean of the 3 measurements was used for statistical analysis.
the duration of the program will be 6 weeks, with two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out. A re-evaluation will be done 4 weeks after the final evaluation and another one after 24 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain on pressure
Time Frame: the duration of the program will be 6 weeks, with two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out. A re-evaluation will be done 4 weeks after the final evaluation and another one after 24 weeks.
This is a continuous quantitative variable. The pain threshold to pressure at the lateral epicondyle was measured with an algometer. The subject remains seated with the arm in 30° of abduction; the elbow in 90° of flexion; and with the forearm, wrist and hand resting on a table. The investigating physical therapist lightly palpates the common extensor tendon to identify the most tender area. Then, starting on the unaffected side, the head of the algometer (hard rubber tip, 1 cm2 surface area) is placed perpendicular to the common extensor tendon at the lateral epicondyle until the patient indicates the moment when the pressure sensation changes to pain. Three measurements are taken on both sides, with a 20-second rest interval between each measurement. The intraobserver reliability of these 3 measurements was excellent (ICC range, .91-.96). For the analysis, the mean value (in kg/cm2 ) of the 3 stresses was calculated. The maximum applied pressure was 6 kg/cm2 .
the duration of the program will be 6 weeks, with two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out. A re-evaluation will be done 4 weeks after the final evaluation and another one after 24 weeks.
global pain
Time Frame: the duration of the program will be 6 weeks, with two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out. A re-evaluation will be done 4 weeks after the final evaluation and another one after 24 weeks.
This is a discrete quantitative variable. Pain was measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS-P). The procedure is as follows, the patient is asked at the present moment what pain he/she feels from 0 to 10 if zero is zero pain and 10 is the maximum pain he/she has perceived. The NRS-P is a 10 cm long line calibrated from 0 to 10. 10. The NRS has been shown to have a test-retest reliability of 0.64 to 0.86, from good to excellent (7).
the duration of the program will be 6 weeks, with two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out. A re-evaluation will be done 4 weeks after the final evaluation and another one after 24 weeks.
DASH QUESTIONARY
Time Frame: the duration of the program will be 6 weeks, with two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out. A re-evaluation will be done 4 weeks after the final evaluation and another one after 24 weeks.
It is a discrete quantitative variable. The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire is a self-administered outcome questionnaire that measures physical disability and symptoms of all upper extremity disorders. It includes 30 items related to 120 symptoms and activities of daily living. The total score is 100, and a higher score indicates a greater degree of disability.
the duration of the program will be 6 weeks, with two sessions per week with 72 hours of rest between sessions. A total of 12 sessions will be carried out. A re-evaluation will be done 4 weeks after the final evaluation and another one after 24 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: María Balsa-Amarante, MSc, University of Alcalá

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 24, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lateral Epicondylitis \(Tennis Elbow\)

Clinical Trials on neural tensioning technique on radial nerve

Subscribe