Effectiveness of Stanley Paris Manual Therapy vs. Conventional Physiotherapy in Reducing Pain and Improving Function in Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis (SPMT vs CPT in)

March 23, 2026 updated by: Dr Abdul Haseeb Bhutta, Ibadat International University, Islamabad

Effectiveness of Stanley Paris Manual Therapy Concept Versus Conventional Physiotherapy in Pain Reduction and Functional Improvement in Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis

This study aims to compare two different physiotherapy approaches for people suffering from Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) - a condition that causes knee pain, stiffness, and difficulty in walking.

The first approach is the Stanley Paris Manual Therapy Concept, which involves hands-on treatment techniques such as joint mobilization, soft tissue massage, and movement correction. The second is Conventional Physiotherapy, which uses traditional exercises and electrotherapy (like heat, ultrasound, or TENS) to reduce pain and improve strength.

The study will include 50 patients aged 40-60 years who have moderate knee osteoarthritis. They will be randomly divided into two groups - one receiving manual therapy and the other receiving conventional physiotherapy - for 6 to 8 weeks.

Researchers will measure pain, knee function, range of motion, balance, and quality of life before and after treatment to see which method gives better results.

By identifying which therapy works more effectively, this study will help patients, families, and healthcare providers choose the most beneficial and evidence-based treatment for improving movement, reducing pain, and enhancing daily living activities in people with knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint disorder that causes pain, stiffness, and loss of mobility, often leading to functional limitations and reduced quality of life. In Grade II OA, cartilage damage is moderate and potentially reversible through appropriate rehabilitation strategies. This stage offers an important opportunity for physiotherapy interventions to restore function and delay further joint deterioration.

The Stanley Paris Manual Therapy Concept emphasizes a biomechanical and hands-on approach to rehabilitation. It includes joint mobilization, soft tissue manipulation, neural mobilization, and correction of faulty movement patterns to restore normal joint motion and neuromuscular control. In contrast, Conventional Physiotherapy typically focuses on pain management using electrotherapy modalities, strengthening exercises, and general mobility training.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment approaches in individuals with Grade II knee osteoarthritis. Fifty participants will be randomly allocated into two equal groups: one receiving the Stanley Paris manual therapy and the other receiving conventional physiotherapy, for a period of 6-8 weeks. Standardized assessment tools - including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for function and quality of life, and the Berg Balance Scale for proprioception and stability - will be used to evaluate outcomes at baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention.

The study will generate clinical evidence on whether manual therapy provides superior outcomes in terms of pain relief, functional improvement, and patient satisfaction compared to conventional physiotherapy. Results are expected to assist clinicians in developing more effective rehabilitation protocols for managing knee osteoarthritis and improving patients' independence and overall well-being.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Federal
      • Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan
        • Ibadat international University islamabad

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed with Grade II knee osteoarthritis based on radiographic and clinical criteria.
  • Participants experiencing knee pain for at least three months.
  • Ability to walk independently without assistive devices.
  • Willingness to participate in a structured physiotherapy program.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of Grade III or IV knee osteoarthritis.
  • History of knee surgery or joint replacement.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory joint diseases.
  • Neurological conditions affecting lower limb function.
  • Contraindications to manual therapy or exercise interventions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stanley Paris group
Participants in this group will receive treatment based on the Stanley Paris Manual Therapy Concept, which emphasizes hands-on techniques to restore joint biomechanics and improve movement patterns. Interventions will include joint mobilization (Maitland and Kaltenborn grades II-IV), soft tissue and myofascial release, neural mobilization, proprioceptive training, and functional movement retraining. Sessions will be conducted 4 times per week for 6 weeks by trained physiotherapists following a standardized treatment protocol.
This intervention follows the Stanley Paris Manual Therapy Concept, a hands-on approach emphasizing biomechanical correction and functional movement restoration. Treatment will include Maitland and Kaltenborn joint mobilization (Grades II-IV), patellar glides, soft tissue and myofascial release, neural mobilization, and movement pattern retraining. Sessions will also include proprioceptive and balance exercises, functional strengthening, and patient education on posture and joint protection. Each participant will receive 4 sessions per week for 6 weeks, lasting approximately 45-60 minutes each, delivered by trained manual therapists using a standardized protocol.
Other Names:
  • Manual Therapy
  • Stanley Paris Approach
  • joint Mobilization and Movement Re-education
Active Comparator: Conventional Physical Therapy
Participants in this group will receive Conventional Physiotherapy, including electrotherapy modalities (TENS, ultrasound, heat/cold therapy), general strengthening exercises, range-of-motion and flexibility exercises, and basic balance training. The focus will be on pain reduction, muscle strengthening, and functional mobility improvement. Sessions will also be conducted 4 times per week for 6 weeks following standard clinical practice guidelines for knee osteoarthritis management.
This intervention consists of standard physiotherapy treatment commonly used for Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis. It includes electrotherapy modalities such as TENS, ultrasound, and hot/cold therapy, along with therapeutic exercises for strengthening, flexibility, and balance. Exercises include open-chain and closed-chain strengthening, range-of-motion activities, and static stretching. Participants will receive 4 supervised sessions per week for 6 weeks, each lasting 45-60 minutes, administered by qualified physiotherapists following evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
Other Names:
  • Standard Physical Therapy
  • Routine Physiotherapy
  • Exercise and Electrotherapy Program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Reduction Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Change in pain intensity from baseline to 4th week and 8 weeks
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be used to assess the intensity of knee pain. Participants will mark their pain level on a 10 cm line ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst imaginable pain"). Pain scores will be recorded at baseline, after 4 weeks, after 8 weeks of treatment.
Change in pain intensity from baseline to 4th week and 8 weeks
Functional Improvement Measured by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Change in KOOS scores from baseline to 4th weeks and 8 weeks.
The KOOS questionnaire will assess knee function, daily living activities, sports and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. Each subscale is scored from 0 (extreme problems) to 100 (no problems).
Change in KOOS scores from baseline to 4th weeks and 8 weeks.
Knee Range of Motion Measured by Goniometer
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4th weeks and 8 weeks post-intervention.
Active knee flexion and extension will be measured using a standard universal goniometer to assess joint mobility.
Change from baseline to 4th weeks and 8 weeks post-intervention.
Balance and Proprioception Measured by Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4th week and 8 weeks post-intervention.
The Berg Balance Scale (14 items, score range 0-56) will assess participants' static and dynamic balance. Higher scores indicate better balance and lower fall risk.
Change from baseline to 4th week and 8 weeks post-intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Prof. Dr. Muhammad Nazim Farooq, Ph.D., Ibadat International University, Islamabad

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that support the results of this study - including demographic data, baseline characteristics, intervention details, and outcome measures (VAS, KOOS, Range of Motion, and Berg Balance Scale scores) - may be shared. No personally identifiable information will be disclosed. Data will be available upon reasonable request from qualified researchers for academic or clinical research purposes following publication of the main study results.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

February 2026

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

On demand IPD will be shared with journals editor

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee

Clinical Trials on Hands-on manual therapy including joint mobilization, soft tissue and neural mobilization, and movement retraining based on the Stanley Paris Concept.

Subscribe