Accuracy of Convex Probe EBUS-TBNA Versus FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Malignancies

June 26, 2024 updated by: Fatma Alzahraa, Ain Shams University

Accuracy of Convex Probe EBUS-TBNA Versus FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Diagnosis of Suspected Lung Cancer & Staging of Concurrent Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy at Ain-Shams University Hospitals

Lung cancer is a prevalent cause of cancer-related mortality on a global scale. Appropriate staging of lung cancer is of paramount importance, as it customizes treatment and predicts prognosis. Fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with low dose contrast computed tomography (CT) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are two diagnostic modalities widely used in the field of staging & diagnosis of lung malignancies, the former depends on image analysis while the later enables real-time sampling of lymph nodes under sonographic guidance with concurrent cytological examination. The present research aims to compare the diagnostic and staging accuracies of (EBUS-TBNA) versus FDG-PET /CT as two diagnostic modalities in patients with suspected lung malignancies. However as a secondary outcome this study aims at monitoring the possible complications arising post EBUS-TBNA procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lung cancer is a prevalent cause of cancer-related mortality on a global scale. Appropriate staging of lung cancer is of paramount importance, as it customizes treatment and predicts prognosis. Fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with low dose contrast computed tomography (CT) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are two diagnostic modalities widely used in the field of staging & diagnosis of lung malignancies, the former depends on image analysis while the later enables real-time sampling of lymph nodes under sonographic guidance with concurrent cytological examination.

Objective: To compare the diagnostic and staging accuracy of convex probe EBUS-TBNA versus FDG - PET/CT as two diagnostic modalities in diagnosis of suspected lung cancer & staging of concurrent mediastinal lymphadenopathy Patients and Methods: This prospective, interventional cohort research was performed on 40 cases with suspected lung malignancies. All cases were examined via FDG-PET/CT followed by convex probe EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer & staging of concurrent mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Department of chest diseases , faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years old or more.
  • Patients presented with centrally located suspiciously malignant lung masses with or without lymphadenopathy.
  • patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy only as evident by contrast - enhanced CT scan of the chest.
  • patients with peripheral lung malignancy and mediastinal lymphadenopathy who were referred for MLN staging were also recruited to the research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients who were who were unfit for bronchoscopy as per international guidelines for practice.
  • Cases are diagnosed with stage IV (metastatic) lung cancer.
  • Patients with histopathological diagnosis other than malignancy (as Sarcoidosis, Tuberculosis).
  • patients unfit for FDG-PET G-PET/CT examination (uncontrolled Hyperglycemia, renal impairment).
  • Patients who refused to participate to the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: FDG PET and EBUS TBNA arm
It is a single arm in which all patients undergo FDG PET and EBUS-TBNA
Endo bronchial ultrasound enables visualization of parabronchial structures throughout a bronchoscopic procedure. EBUS-TBNA, which is considered a less invasive diagnostic tool for nodal staging compared to mediastinoscopy, allows real-time, direct sampling of hilar & MLNs under sonograghic guidance with concurrent cytological and histopathological examination
Other Names:
  • FDG-PET/CT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparing the diagnostic accuracies of both EBUS TBNA and FDG-PET /CT
Time Frame: 2 years
Comparing the diagnostic yield of both modalies as they are considered primary main diagnostic and staging modalities for lung malignancies
2 years
Comparing the staging accuracies of both convex probe EBUS-TBNA versus FDG - PET/CT
Time Frame: 2 years
Accurate staging of lung malignancies is considered crucial in determining the prognosis and specifying the treatment plan.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the complications
Time Frame: 2 years
EBUS TBNA is a minimally invasive procedure having a very low rate of complications compared to mediastinoscopy, this study aims to monitor complications (if present)
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Emad Korraa, MD, Department of chest diseases and head of the bronchoscopy unit

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • department of chest diseases

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

Clinical Trials on Endo bronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration(EBUS-TBNA)

Subscribe