Asleep Fiberoptic vs Direct Laryngoscopy Effect on Hemodynamic Stability Using Opioid Free Anesthesia Induction

December 15, 2025 updated by: Christian Rouphael, American University of Beirut Medical Center

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare blood pressure and heart rate between the fiberoptic and direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction. Secondary objectives include comparing the time needed for intubation and the incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and upper airway trauma in adults aging between 18 to 55 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does fiberoptic intubation cause less hemodynamic instability than direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Intubation has always been linked to a transient increase in blood pressure and heart rate that could be deleterious in elderly and hemodynamically unstable patients. Fiberoptic intubation, which is currently used for suspected difficult intubation, could cause less marked rise in blood pressure and heart rate. Furthermore, "opioid free anesthesia" has gained popularity lately to avoid opioid adverse effects ranging from respiratory depression, postoperative ileus, sedation, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention.

Specific aims: The primary objective of this study is to compare blood pressure and heart rate between the fiberoptic and direct oral intubation using opioid free anesthesia induction. Secondary objectives include comparing the time needed for intubation and the incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and upper airway trauma.

Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 90 (45 in each group) adults aging between 18 to 55 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, will be recruited over 1 year of work. Patients will be randomly allocated to 2 groups: The direct conventional laryngoscopy group performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade, and the fiberoptic guided intubation group.

Significance: Studies comparing hemodynamic stability using fiberoptic intubation versus direct oral intubation in opioid free anesthesia are limited. The present study will assess whether fiberoptic intubation causes less hemodynamic instability than direct oral intubation in opioid free anesthesia induction, which will benefit patients with normal airways.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Christian Rouphael, MD
  • Phone Number: 6820 01 350 000
  • Email: cr30@aub.edu.lb

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Thuraya HajAli, MSc
  • Phone Number: 5738 01 350 000
  • Email: th64@aub.edu.lb

Study Locations

      • Beirut, Lebanon
        • Recruiting
        • Christian Rouphael
        • Contact:
          • Christian Rouphael, M.D.
          • Phone Number: 6380 00-961-350-000
          • Email: cr30@aub.edu.lb

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I and II
  • Range age of 18-55 years' old
  • Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cardiovascular diseases.
  • History of lung disease.
  • Hypertensive patient (BP> 140/90)
  • Patient taking medications that affect blood pressure and heart rate
  • Morbid obesity (BMI >30)
  • Severe GERD
  • Predicted difficult airway (Short TMD <6 cm, Upper li bite test grade III, Mallampati score

    >III)

  • Neck instability
  • Patient planned to receive rapid sequence intubation
  • Patient refusal to participate
  • History of difficult intubation/ ventilation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: The direct conventional laryngoscopy group
The direct conventional laryngoscopy group will be performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade.
direct conventional laryngoscopy will be performed with N3 (for females) or N4 (for males) Macintosh laryngoscope blade.
Experimental: The fiberoptic guided intubation group
The fiberoptic guided intubation will be performed.
fiberoptic guided intubation will be performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate
Time Frame: baseline and up to 5 mins upon intubation
Heart rate (bpm)
baseline and up to 5 mins upon intubation
Blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline and up to 5 mins upon intubation
Blood pressure (mm Hg)
baseline and up to 5 mins upon intubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time needed for intubation
Time Frame: between face mask removal and first ETCO2 reading in minutes
time (between face mask removal and first ETCO2 reading in minutes)
between face mask removal and first ETCO2 reading in minutes
incidence of postoperative sore throat
Time Frame: after 24 hrs
Sore throat pain (0-10)
after 24 hrs
incidence of upper airway trauma
Time Frame: during intubation
incidence of upper airway trauma (Yes or No)
during intubation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian Rouphael, MD, American University of Beirut Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BIO-2023-0271

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, General

Clinical Trials on direct conventional laryngoscopy

Subscribe