- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06491849
Evaluation of Peri-implant Conditions of Orthodontic Mini Implants
Observational Study on the Peri-implant/Screw Conditions of Mini Implants Placed During Orthodontic Treatment
This observational study aims to evaluate the peri-implant conditions of mini implants placed during orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic mini implants are commonly used as temporary anchorage devices to prevent or reduce unwanted tooth movements during orthodontic treatment. The stability of these implants, both primary and secondary, is crucial for their success. Primary stability refers to the mechanical locking between the implant and bone immediately after placement, while secondary stability is achieved through bone remodeling around the implant over time.
Factors affecting the stability and success of mini implants include the patient's age, gender, cortical bone thickness and density, the site of implant placement, the presence of mobile surrounding tissue, implant dimensions, surface characteristics, and the magnitude and duration of applied orthodontic forces. Peri-implantitis, an inflammation around the implant, is a significant risk factor for implant failure and is influenced by oral hygiene and the quality of surrounding soft tissue.
This study will observe and analyze the peri-implant conditions in patients receiving orthodontic treatment with mini implants, focusing on the incidence of gingival/mucosal inflammation and other factors that may affect implant stability and success.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Title:
Evaluation of Peri-implant Conditions of Orthodontic Mini Implants
Objective:
The primary objective of this observational study is to evaluate the periodontal conditions surrounding orthodontic mini implants placed during orthodontic treatment. Additionally, the study aims to assess the impact of existing periodontal/peri-implant conditions on the stability of the mini implants.
Background:
Orthodontic mini screws/implants are commonly used as temporary anchorage devices to prevent or reduce unwanted tooth movements during orthodontic treatment. For these mini screws to function effectively as anchorage units, they must be resistant to the forces applied and remain stable at the site of placement throughout their use. Stability is classified into two types: primary stability, which is the mechanical locking between the implant and bone immediately after placement, and secondary stability, which results from bone remodeling around the implant over time. Both types of stability are crucial for the success of mini implants.
Several factors influence the stability and success of mini implants, including the patient's age, gender, cortical bone thickness and density, the site of implant placement, mobility of surrounding tissues, implant dimensions, surface characteristics, and the magnitude and duration of applied orthodontic forces. Peri-implantitis, an inflammation around the implant, is a significant risk factor for implant failure and is influenced by oral hygiene and the quality of surrounding soft tissues.
Hypothesis:
The hypothesis of this study is that the incidence of gingival/mucosal inflammation around the peri-implant/mini screw areas is high.
Methodology:
Patient Population:
The study will include patients treated at Altinbas University Dental Hospital's Departments of Periodontology and Orthodontics between March 2021 and March 2023. Patients must have at least one orthodontic mini implant placed and be systemically healthy. Patients with a history of prosthetic treatment or those taking medications that affect periodontal tissues (e.g., Cyclosporine-A, Calcium Channel Blockers, Phenytoin) will be excluded.
Clinical Assessments:
Primary Assessments:
Clinical periodontal/peri-implant measurements for the entire mouth and each mini implant/screw.
Bleeding on probing (yes/no), suppuration (yes/no), mucosal redness (erythema), plaque index (0-3), gingival index (0-3), probing depth (mm), clinical attachment loss (mm), width of keratinized mucosa (mm), peri-implant mucosal thickness (mm), and radiographic evaluation of the distance between the mini implant/screw and roots (mm).
Secondary Assessments:
Stability of the mini implants/screws measured using a torque gauge. Type of orthodontic force applied, method of placement (with or without a stent), surface characteristics, type (self-tapping/self-drilling), dimensions (diameter and length), duration of application, amount of force applied (<250 grams), and type of orthodontic force system (elastic/coil systems).
Statistical Analysis:
The study will utilize descriptive statistical methods to evaluate the collected data. Due to the original nature of the research, a power analysis could not be performed before the study.
Expected Outcomes:
The findings from this study are expected to highlight the importance of soft tissue health and maintenance during the planning, surgical placement, and post-operative phases of mini implant applications in orthodontics. Additionally, the study aims to elucidate the impact of existing oral hygiene on the stability and force continuity of mini implants in similar patient groups, thereby providing insights into the optimal frequency of periodontal maintenance for individuals with mini implant anchorage.
Study Location:
Altinbas University Dental Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Neighbourhood, Incirli St. No:11-A, 34147 Bakırköy, Istanbul, Turkey.
This detailed description provides a comprehensive overview of your study, outlining its objectives, background, methodology, and expected outcomes in a structured and academic manner.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34147
- Altinbas University, Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants who have at least one orthodontic mini implant placed for anchorage during orthodontic treatment.
- Systemically healthy individuals.
- Participants without a history of prosthetic treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals taking medications that can affect periodontal tissues (e.g., Cyclosporine-A, Calcium Channel Blockers, Phenytoin).
- Individuals with a history of prosthetic treatment.
- Individuals without orthodontic mini implants.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Orthodontic Mini Implant Group
Participants with at least one orthodontic mini implant placed for anchorage during orthodontic treatment.
The study will evaluate the peri-implant conditions, including gingival and mucosal inflammation, implant stability, and other related factors.
|
This intervention involves a detailed clinical evaluation of peri-implant conditions in patients who have received orthodontic mini implants.
The assessments include measuring periodontal parameters such as probing depth, bleeding on probing, mucosal redness, plaque index, gingival index, and implant stability.
The evaluations are conducted at specified intervals during and after orthodontic anchorage treatment to monitor changes and ensure the health of peri-implant tissues.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gingival/Mucosal Inflammation
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measurement of gingival and mucosal inflammation around the orthodontic mini implants using clinical indices. Units of Measure: Gingival Index (GI) (0-3) Plaque Index (PI) (0-3) |
3 months
|
|
Probing Pocket/Mucosal Depth
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measurement of the depth of periodontal pockets or mucosal depth around the mini implants.
Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
|
3 months
|
|
Clinical Attachment Loss (Gingival recession)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measurement of the loss of attachment or gingival recession in the periodontal tissues and around the mini implants.
Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
|
3 months
|
|
Width of Keratinized Mucosa
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measurement of the width of keratinized mucosa around the mini implants.
Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
|
3 months
|
|
Thickness of Peri-Implant/Screw Mucosa
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measurement of the thickness of the mucosa around the mini implants.
Unit of Measure: Thick/Thin
|
3 months
|
|
Radiographic Evaluation
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measurement of the distance between the mini implant/screw and adjacent roots.
Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
|
3 months
|
|
Bleeding on Probing
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Assessment of the presence or absence of bleeding upon probing around the mini implants and teeth.
Unit of Measure: Binary (Yes/No) and given as percentage by the site and full mouth.
|
3 months
|
|
Mucosal redness (Erythema)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Assessment of the presence and degree of mucosal redness around the mini implants. Unit of Measure: Binary (Yes/No) |
3 months
|
|
Mucosal discomfort
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Patient-reported discomfort in the area surrounding the mini implants.
Unit of Measure: Binary (Yes/No)
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant Stability
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Assessment of the stability of the orthodontic mini implants using a torque gauge to measure insertion and removal torque values.
Unit of Measure: Torque (Ncm)
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mehmet Selim YILDIZ, Asst. Prof., Altinbas University, Faculty of Dentistry
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kim TW. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.031.
- Ure DS, Oliver DR, Kim KB, Melo AC, Buschang PH. Stability changes of miniscrew implants over time. Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):994-1000. doi: 10.2319/120810-711.1. Epub 2011 May 25.
- Samrit V, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Seith A, Malhotra V. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients. Aust Orthod J. 2012 Nov;28(2):204-12.
- Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Spontaneous progression of experimentally induced periimplantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):845-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00567.x.
- Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jul;130(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032.
- Parmar R, Reddy V, Reddy SK, Reddy D. Determination of soft tissue thickness at orthodontic miniscrew placement sites using ultrasonography for customizing screw selection. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Oct;150(4):651-658. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.026.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021/49
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Implantation
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaActive, not recruitingDental Implantation | Dental ImplantsChina
-
The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School...RecruitingDental Implantation | Dental Implants | OsseointegrationChina
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakRecruitingDENTAL IMPLANTATIONIndia
-
Fundación Eduardo AnituaCompleted
-
William GiannobileJohnson & JohnsonWithdrawnDental ImplantationUnited States
-
Innovative Implant SolutionsUnknownDental ImplantationIsrael
-
Ahram Canadian UniversityAl Hayah University In CairoCompletedDental Implantation | Dental Implant | Surgical Dental ProsthesesEgypt
-
Samara State Medical UniversityRecruitingDental ImplantationRussian Federation
-
University of LiegeRecruiting
-
Fundación Eduardo AnituaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Peri-implant Condition Evaluation
-
Studio Ban Mancini FabbriNot yet recruitingPeri-implant Crevicular Fluid
-
Hanna LahteenmakiUniversity of HelsinkiEnrolling by invitationPeri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis | Peri-Implant HealthFinland
-
University of PittsburghEnrolling by invitationPeri-Implantitis | Peri-implant MucositisUnited States
-
Vilniaus Implantologijos Centro (VIC) KlinikaCompletedPeri-implantitis | Peri-Implantational Loss | Peri-Implantation Loss | Peri-Implant HealthLithuania
-
Medical University of GrazCompleted
-
Arrow DevelopmentSalud y Estetica Dental SCH Zurbano S.L; Clinica Dental Nexus, Malaga; Clinica... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingPeri-implantitis | Peri-implant Bone Loss
-
University of ManitobaCompletedDetermination of Clinical Effects | Presence of Inflammatory Cytokines | Patients Perception of Discomfort | Titanium Scalers | UltrasonicsCanada
-
Universidade Metropolitana de SantosCompletedFailure of Dental Implant Due to Lack of Attached Gingiva | Failure of Dental Prosthesis Causing Loss of Dental ImplantBrazil
-
University of MichiganOsteology FoundationRecruitingPeri ImplantitisUnited States
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedPeri-implantitis | Peri-implant Mucositis | Peri-Implant HealthTurkey (Türkiye)