- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05938868
Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Low Level Laser Therapy Post Dental Implant
November 17, 2024 updated by: Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie, Ahram Canadian University
Efficacy of Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound and Low Level Laser Therapy on Osseointegration and Soft Tissue Healing Following Dental Implant Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of the study is to investigate the significance difference between low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) versus low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on osseointegration, soft tissue healing, pain pressure threshold and oral health related quality of life in patients post dental implant surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
63
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Giza
-
Al Ḩayy Ath Thāmin, Giza, Egypt, 3221405
- Outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Ahram Canadian University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult Patients.
- Both sexes will be contributed in the study.
- Non-smokers.
- Patients who needed dental implant in the maxillary or in the mandible.
- Bone height and width no less than Class III bone quality assessed clinically and radiologically.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medically compromised patients as Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
- Patients indicated for bone graft at the implant site.
- Patients under chemotherapy or radiotherapy in facial region.
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Patients with any history of temporomandibular joint disorders.
- Patients with any other periodontal and oral surgeries
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A (LIPUS group)
This group will include 17 patients who received Dental Implant Surgery.
Patients will be treated with low intensity pulsed ultrasound in addition to standard care.
|
LIPUS will be delivered intra-orally using a probe applied on the buccal aspect of the implant site.
The probe is in contact with the buccal attached gingiva with a thin film of intra oral gel intervening between them, acting as a transmitting medium.
It will be applied twice a week for 20 minutes each session that commenced after surgery on the second day and continued for 10 weeks.
The intensity of ultrasound therapy used was 30 mW/cm2 with a frequency of 1.5 MHz and temporal average power of 20 Mw
Patients in all three groups will receive the standard care which includes: (1) Extra-oral ice packs during the first 2 days every two hour; (2) maintain daily routine oral hygiene after surgery; (3) Patients will be instructed to eat a soft diet for one weeks; (4) Broad spectrum oral antibiotics in a dose of one capsule every twelve hours for a week; (5) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at a dose of one tablet every 8 hours for four days; (6) Warm chlorhexidine gluconate solution as a mouthwash for a period of 2 weeks to enhance plaque control.
|
|
Experimental: Group B (LLLT group)
This group will include 17 patients who received Dental Implant Surgery.
The patients will be irradiated with low level diode laser therapy (GaAs) in addition to standard care.
|
Patients in all three groups will receive the standard care which includes: (1) Extra-oral ice packs during the first 2 days every two hour; (2) maintain daily routine oral hygiene after surgery; (3) Patients will be instructed to eat a soft diet for one weeks; (4) Broad spectrum oral antibiotics in a dose of one capsule every twelve hours for a week; (5) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at a dose of one tablet every 8 hours for four days; (6) Warm chlorhexidine gluconate solution as a mouthwash for a period of 2 weeks to enhance plaque control.
The patients will be irradiated with low level diode laser therapy (GaAs) (Chattanooga, model 27841, USA) .Patient will be irradiated with low level diode laser therapy with parameters: wavelength 850 nm and power of 200 mw in continuous mode will be applied in six points in non-contact method 10 mm away from the peri-implant soft tissue after suturing.
The laser irradiations will be administered at six sites that included mesiobuccally, distobuccal, midbuccal, midlingual, mesial, and distal areas around implant for a duration of 10 seconds for each site.
The total energy delivered was 6 J per session.
And is based on a previous study by Gulati et al., 2020
|
|
Active Comparator: Group C (Control group)
This group will include 17 patients who received Dental Implant Surgery.
Patients will be treated with standard care only after surgery for 2 weeks.
|
Patients in all three groups will receive the standard care which includes: (1) Extra-oral ice packs during the first 2 days every two hour; (2) maintain daily routine oral hygiene after surgery; (3) Patients will be instructed to eat a soft diet for one weeks; (4) Broad spectrum oral antibiotics in a dose of one capsule every twelve hours for a week; (5) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at a dose of one tablet every 8 hours for four days; (6) Warm chlorhexidine gluconate solution as a mouthwash for a period of 2 weeks to enhance plaque control.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Osseointegration
Time Frame: Changes in Osseintegration immediately postoperative, after 6 weeks and after 3 months
|
X-ray Radiograph will be performed for each patients and then analyzied by Specialized software to evaluate the osseointegration between bone and implant surface.
The radiographs will be taken in high-resolution mode (Vista Scan Durr Dental, Durr Dental Italy S.r.l) with a dental X-ray machine (TM 2002 Planmeca Proline CC, Planmeca Group Helsinki, Finland) equipped with a long tube that operated at 70 Kw/7.5 mA.
Specialized software (DBSWIN software, Durr Dental Italy S.r.l) will be used for linear measurements of marginal bone changes
|
Changes in Osseintegration immediately postoperative, after 6 weeks and after 3 months
|
|
Changes in soft tissue healing
Time Frame: Changes in soft tissue healing immediately postoperative, after 6 weeks and after 3 months
|
Landry index for soft tissue healing will be used to measure soft tissue healing.
The healing index (HI) evaluates healing based on redness, presence of granulation tissues, bleeding, suppuration, and epithelialization.
A score of 1-5 was given with score 1 for very poor healing and 5 being excellent healing of the tissues.
Higher scores indicate better healing rates.
This index assesses the surgical wound by clinical examination.
|
Changes in soft tissue healing immediately postoperative, after 6 weeks and after 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Pain pressure threshold
Time Frame: Changes in Pain pressure threshold immediately postoperative, after 6 weeks and after 3 months
|
Pain pressure threshold at temporalis and masseter muscles will be measured at immediately post dental implant, after 6 weeks and after 3 months of treatment.
A blinded assessor will use an algometer (FPX 25, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich CT, USA), a device that measures pressure or applied force on any part of the body, to register the pressure pain threshold (PPT) for temporalis and masseter muscles
|
Changes in Pain pressure threshold immediately postoperative, after 6 weeks and after 3 months
|
|
Changes in oral quality of life
Time Frame: Changes in oral quality of life immediately postoperative, after 6 weeks and after 3 months
|
Oral health-related quality of life is an established and relevant instrument with which to describe patient satisfaction.
It will be measured at immediately post dental implant, after 6 weeks and after 3 months of treatment.
OHRQoL consisting of 12-Item short-form Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Measures with a scale from 0 to 4 (Never, hardly ever, Occasionally, Fairly Often and Very Often) with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
|
Changes in oral quality of life immediately postoperative, after 6 weeks and after 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Amal Abd El-Baky, Ph.d, Cairo University
- Study Director: Osama Gouda, Ph.D, Faculty of Dentistry, Badr University
- Principal Investigator: Hussein Mogahed, Ph.D, Cairo University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 5, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 12, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
September 12, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 1, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
July 11, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 20, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 17, 2024
Last Verified
November 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 012/470001072023
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Implantation
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaActive, not recruitingDental Implantation | Dental ImplantsChina
-
The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School...RecruitingDental Implantation | Dental Implants | OsseointegrationChina
-
Rambam Health Care CampusRecruiting
-
International Piezosurgery AcademyCompleted
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR); Nobel BiocareCompleted
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakRecruitingDENTAL IMPLANTATIONIndia
-
Fundación Eduardo AnituaCompleted
-
William GiannobileJohnson & JohnsonWithdrawnDental ImplantationUnited States
-
Innovative Implant SolutionsUnknownDental ImplantationIsrael
-
Samara State Medical UniversityRecruitingDental ImplantationRussian Federation
Clinical Trials on Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS)
-
Tao LiuXuanwu Hospital, Beijing; Tianjin Medical University General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Orthofix Inc.Active, not recruitingMetatarsal FractureUnited States
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class IISyrian Arab Republic
-
University of LahoreCompleted
-
Suzhou Municipal HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University; The First Affiliated... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
McMaster UniversityCompletedKnee OsteoarthritisCanada
-
Ammar Kasem AlzoubiRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Sadam ElayahSichuan UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalNot yet recruiting