Promoting Sustainable and Active Mobility Among Employees and Students (DiNaMo-active)

November 19, 2025 updated by: Hannover Medical School

Impact of Physically Active Versus Passive Way to Work on Physical and Mental Aspects of Health in Members at Hannover Universities: an Observational Study

The aim of the study is to assess health data (heart rate variability, blood pressure, blood glucose, particulate matter pollution) and travel characteristics (length, duration and type of commute) on the way to and from work from members of the universities in Hannover (Germany).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Active mobility, (i.e. moving around using the own physical strength) has positive sustainability effects. The physically active way to and from college is a great untapped resources for health promotion. The aim of this sub-project is to examine the way to university in order to assess its effect on individual health depending on the means of transport.

In order to determine the status quo and changes in mobility behavior the investigators will use movement trajectories using smartphone apps or inexpensive trackers in a larger cohort, as well as more specified health measures including overweight status, blood pressure, blood glucose concentration, lack of exercise, particulate matter and risk of accidents in a smaller sub-cohort.

By linking this data with the personal characteristics surveyed in other sub-projects, an evaluation of the individual health status and the expected health benefits depending on the route to work can be created. This represents the database for identifying certain groups of people or status groups who could particularly benefit from targeted promotion of an active commute.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Employees and Students of Hannover Medical School, Leibniz University Hannover, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hannover, and the Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology (all Lower Saxony, Germany)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • living within 50km around the workplace

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current participation in another interventional study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Long-term group
University members who use mainly one transport mode to get to the work place
Short-term group
University members who alternate their transport habits between physically active and passive commuting

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate variability (HRV)
Time Frame: 24 hours on two separate days for the short-term subgroup, and 7 consecutive days for the long-term subgroup
HRV measured by a wearable activity tracker
24 hours on two separate days for the short-term subgroup, and 7 consecutive days for the long-term subgroup

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood glucose concentration
Time Frame: 24 hours on two separate days for the short-term subgroup
Intraindividual difference in blood glucose concentration between active and passive commuting as assessed with continuous blood glucose monitoring (Freestyle Libre 3)
24 hours on two separate days for the short-term subgroup
Work-Ability-Index
Time Frame: Once at baseline for both study subgroups

Interindividual difference between work ability as assessed with the Work-Ability-Index-Questionnaire.

By adding up the points obtained from the questionnaire, scores can range from 7 to 49 points. The lower the score, the greater the discrepancy between the job demands placed on the respondent and their individual ability to cope with them.

Once at baseline for both study subgroups
24 hour blood pressure
Time Frame: 24 hours on two separate days for the short-term subgroup
Intraindividual difference in 24 hour arterial blood pressure between active and passive commuting as assessed with 24 hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure monitoring (Boso TM-2450)
24 hours on two separate days for the short-term subgroup
Daily moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) duration
Time Frame: 7 consecutive days for the long-term subgroup
Interindividual difference in MVPA as assessed with a wearable activity tracker (Garmin Smartwatch Forerunner 55)
7 consecutive days for the long-term subgroup
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Once at baseline for both study subgroups
Interindividual difference between health-related quality of life as assessed with the Short Form 36 questionnaire. The possible score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with 0 points representing the greatest health impairment, while 100 points indicate no health impairment.
Once at baseline for both study subgroups
Particulate matter
Time Frame: 24 hours on two separate days for the short-term subgroup
Intraindividual difference in particulate matter concentration between active and passive commuting as assessed with a particulate matter measuring module
24 hours on two separate days for the short-term subgroup

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Uwe Tegtbur, Prof. Dr., Hannover Medical School, Clinic of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobility on the Way to Work and Health-related Outcomes

Subscribe