The Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Acceleration Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction(ACLR)

April 19, 2026 updated by: Shay Efrati, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

The Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) for Acceleration Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR): a Prospective, Randomized Control Study.

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of HBOT for acceleration recovery after ACLR.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

ACL rapture (Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation) is a common injury in sports and cause severe functional problem. The big concern with this injury is the time to return to sport, this is the interest of the athlete.

The preferred treatment today when it comes to active athletes is to have an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) ,the return to high function and sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery lasts about 8 months.

In the last few years, knowledge has been accumulating regarding the effectiveness of the new hyperbaric oxygen protocols in accelerating the healing of wounds and tissue damage. it was found that Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for ligament injuries in mice improves the quality and speed of recovery. The effect of HBOT on the rate of ligament healing has not yet been properly tested in humans.

The constant search for accelerated recovery in sports injuries along with the benefit of the HBOT in tissue healing processes encouraged the need to investigate the rate of recovery after a sports injury under HBOT. Two previous human studies in which medial collateral tear was tested showed positive effect on pain, physical outcome (decreased edema, range of motion and maximal knee flex) and accelerate the return to play. These findings with the fact that ACL injuries are common among athletes and can limit return to sports, reinforce the need to examine the effect of HBOT following ACLR in the terms of improving and speeding up recovery.

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of HBOT for acceleration recovery after ACLR.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Zrifin, Israel, 70300
        • Recruiting
        • The Sagol Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Research Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects willing and able to read, understand and sign an informed consent
  2. Age 18-45
  3. Anterior cruciate ligament tear for reconstruction (with or without meniscal repair).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to attend scheduled clinic visits and/or comply with the study protocol
  2. Additional injury
  3. An inability to perform MRI.
  4. Active malignancy
  5. Chest pathology incompatible with pressure changes (including active asthma)
  6. Ear or sinus pathology incompatible with pressure changes
  7. History of epilepsy
  8. Claustrophobia
  9. Previous knee surgery
  10. Participation in another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) active treatment
The HBOT protocol consists of 6 weeks protocol including 5 daily HBOT sessions per week (total of 30), each session lasts 90 minutes, of 100% oxygen at 2 atmosphere absolute (ATA) with 5-minute air breaks every 20 minutes.

The HBOT protocol consists of 6 weeks protocol including 5 daily HBOT sessions per week (total of 30), each session lasts 90 minutes, of 100% oxygen at 2 atmosphere absolute (ATA) with 5-minute air breaks every 20 minutes.

Investigational product:

Multiplace hyperbaric oxygen chamber (Haux Starmed 2700, Germany) located at the Sagol center for hyperbaric medicine and research, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Israel.

Sham Comparator: hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) Sham treatment
The sham HBOT protocol consists of 6 weeks protocol including 5 daily sham HBOT sessions per week (total of 30), each session includes breathing 21% oxygen by mask in a sham multiplace chamber. Sham pressure will go up to 1.2 ATA during the first five minutes of the session (to stimulate the pressure sensation in the ears), and then decrease during the next 5 minutes to 1.03 ATA for 90 minutes with 5-minute air breaks every 20 minutes.

The HBOT protocol consists of 6 weeks protocol including 5 daily HBOT sessions per week (total of 30), each session lasts 90 minutes, of 100% oxygen at 2 atmosphere absolute (ATA) with 5-minute air breaks every 20 minutes.

Investigational product:

Multiplace hyperbaric oxygen chamber (Haux Starmed 2700, Germany) located at the Sagol center for hyperbaric medicine and research, Shamir (Assaf-Harofeh) Medical Center, Israel.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Knee Documentation Committee
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
The aim of the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) is to detect improvement or deterioration in symptoms, function, and sport activity following knee impairment. Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee MRI
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention

At each of the evaluations, patients will undergo structural MRI scanning. Images will be acquired on MAGNETOM Vida 3T Scanner, configured with a channel receiver knee coils (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) at Shamir medical centre.

Edema and haemorrhage are seen as increased signal in the substance of the ACL in an acute injury.

Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Laxity ligament test
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Laxity ligament test includes 2 parts: 1- Lachman, anterior drawer, pivot - Manual assessment of the knee joint stabilization, The result will recorded as normal to severely abnormal according to criteria established by the IKDC. 2- KT-1000 - The KT-1000 test is knee arthrometer assessment for ACL laxity, The results of the KT-1000 examination will be recorded as normal to severely abnormal according to guidelines established by the IKDC .
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
physical measurement - ROM
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
ROM - Range of motion will be assessed with the patient in the supine position using a goniometer, passive knee flexion will be rated normal to severely abnormal according to established IKDC guidelines.
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
physical measurement - Edema
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Edema- One of the common measurement methods in research is knee perimetry, the assessor measures the knee girth at 3 points: the fold at the popliteal fossa (P0), 5 cm above P0 (PA), and 5 cm below P0 (PB). Data on perimetry were calculate.
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
physical measurement - Maximal quadriceps power by dynamometer
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Maximal quadriceps power by dynamometer - Quadriceps strength after ACLR usually assessed by isometric dynamometry and comparison the strength of the ACLR limb with the uninjured limb.
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Functional scores- (PROM)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Tegner Lysholm knee scoring scale - patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) ,The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions and may range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disabilities, Score are categorized as excellent (95-100), good (84-94), fair (65-83), and poor (<64).
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Functional scores - Vas for global rating of knee function
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Vas for global rating of knee function - measure the participation restrictions experienced during activities of daily living and sports by patients with a history of ACLR. rating of function by assessing the level of knee function on a 0 to 100 scale, with 0 points representing complete loss of function due to their knee injury and 100 points representing their level of function prior to their knee injury.
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Short form health survey (sf-36)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Quality of life questionnaire, scale of 0-100, higher score means better outcome
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Functional measurement
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) - minimally clinical important difference (MCID) is 3 points and MDC intra-rater 7.3 points.
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Functional measurement - (SEBT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) - Minimally clinical important difference (MCID) is 3.5% difference between the two legs.
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Functional measurement - Single Hop test
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Single Hop test - MDC- score improved by 21.98 for women and 21.81 for man (as a % of leg length).
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
physical measurement - Vas for pain
Time Frame: Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention
Vas for pain - Pain scales are useful for the assessment of postoperative pain and based on self-reporting and represent subjective pain intensity, The evaluation is performed according to the IKDC : Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Change from Baseline immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shai a Efrati, MD, Asaf-Harofhe MC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0166-23

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Clinical Trials on hyperbaric oxygen therapy

Subscribe