Direct Pulp Capping Compared to Partial Pulpotomy in Carious Pulp Exposures (Pulp cap)

May 8, 2025 updated by: Nessrin Taha, King Abdullah University Hospital

Outcome of Direct Pulp Capping Compared to Partial Pulpotomy in the Management of Carious Pulp Exposures in Mature Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This a prospective randomized clinical trial that compare vital pulp therapy procedures in permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure. Patients are recruited from the dental teaching clinics at JUST following preset inclusion criteria. They are subsequently randomly assigned to one of treatment procedures. Clinical and radiographic follow up is performed after 6 months and yearly up to 5 years.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Deep carious lesions are commonly encountered in both adults and children with no clear consensus on the ideal clinical management. Vital pulp therapy including direct pulp capping and pulpotomy is increasingly considered in the management of carious pulp exposures when the clinical diagnosis is reversible pulpitis with variable reports of success rates with different materials used and different diagnostic categories.

Aims: The aims of this study are to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping and partial pulpotomy in deep carious lesions of mature permanent teeth using a calcium silicate based material (Biodentine, Septodont, France), and to investigate the relationship between matrix metalloproteinase (MMP 9) levels in the pulpal blood and the outcome of these procedures.

Methods: 120 mature molar teeth in 120 patients with deep carious lesions exposing the pulps on the radiograph and with symptoms of reversible pulpitis will be included in the study. The teeth will be subsequently randomly divided into 2 groups (n=60). One group will receive direct pulp capping and composite restoration, and the second group will receive partial pulpotomy and composite restoration. Pulpal blood will be collected from the exposure site and will be tested for the level of MMP9 using special ElISA kit. Preoperative and postoperative pain level at 48 hours and 7 days will be evaluated on a scale from 0-10.

The treated teeth will be further evaluated clinically and radiographically at 6 and 12 months follow up and yearly afterward. The relationship of the outcome to the level of MMP9 will be investigated. The results will be statistically analyzed using appropriate tests in the SPSS software.

Expected results: Since partial pulpotomy includes the removal of 2-3 mm of the exposed pulp tissue which is theoretically inflamed, it is expected to be more effective in alleviating the patient's symptoms and to have a higher success rate than simply pulp capping the carious exposure. High levels of MMP9 are also expected to have a correlation with the failure rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Irbid, Jordan, 3030
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non -contributory medical history (ASA 1)
  • Molar tooth with extremely deep caries extending>2/3 of dentin or exposing the pulp on the periapical radiograph
  • The tooth should give positive response to cold testing
  • Clinical diagnosis of reversible pulpitis with mild to moderate symptoms
  • The tooth is restorable, probing pocket depth and mobility are within normal limits
  • No signs of pulpal necrosis including sinus tract or swelling
  • No radiographic evidence of periapical changes indicative of apical periodontitis

Exclusion Criteria:

Immature teeth

  • Nonvital teeth
  • Irreversible pulpitis and periapical periodontitis, i.e spontaneous and lingering pain.
  • Inability to achieve hemostasis after 6 minutes of application of 5% NaOCl moist pellet
  • No pulp exposure after nonselective caries removal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Direct pulp capping
After caries excavation and pulp exposure, the cavity is disinfected . the capping material is applied and the tooth is restored.
Two types of vital pulp therapy procedures
Other Names:
  • Partial pulpotomy
Active Comparator: Partial pulpotomy
After caries excavation and pulp exposure, 2-3 mm of the exposed pulp are cut . The capping material is applied and the tooth is restored.
Two types of vital pulp therapy procedures
Other Names:
  • Partial pulpotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short term clinical outcome
Time Frame: one week
Resolution of clinical symptoms
one week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
long term outcome
Time Frame: 1-5 years
Maintenance of pulp vitality
1-5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Prof Nessrin A Taha, PhD, Jordan University of Science and Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 28, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 131/2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Original data can be provided upon a reasonable request, and may be available after publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deep Caries

Clinical Trials on Direct pulp capping and partial pulpotomy

Subscribe