PVP-Guided Decongestive Therapy in HF 2 (PERIPHERAL-HF2)

December 1, 2024 updated by: Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital

Peripheral Venous Pressure-Guided Decongestive Therapy in Heart Failure 2

The investigators hypothesize that a simple assessment of peripheral venous pressure (PVP) will better predict the diuretic need and long-term outcomes (all cause mortality, all cause rehospitalization, emergency department visits) compared to standard evaluation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

I. BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE

Precise assessment of volume status is essential in diagnosis and management of diuretic therapy in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). Unfortunately, no clear guidelines are present for in-hospital management of congestion. Consequently, nearly half of the patients hospitalized for congestive HF are discharged with persistent congestion. This contributes to high rates of readmission and mortality.

Recently, it has been shown that a simple assessment of peripheral venous pressure (PVP) demonstrates a high correlation with central venous pressure (CVP), indicating that PVP may be useful in the standard bedside clinical assessment of volume status in HF patients to help guiding decongestive therapy.

II. THE HYPOTHESIS

The main hypothesis is as follows: A simple assessment of peripheral venous pressure (PVP) will better guide the diuretic need and long-term outcomes (all-cause mortality, all cause re-hospitalization, emergency department visits) compared to standard evaluation.

III. METHODS

  1. Application for Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics board approval The study will be at participating centers. An IRB/Ethics board approval has been obtained from Marmara University, Pendik Training and Research Hospital local ethics board.
  2. Study population Patients 18-99 years old who were admitted with a de novo or decompensated chronic HF and accept to participate in the study will be enrolled. Patients will be included regardless of ejection fraction or etiology of HF, but these will be noted as baseline variables. All patients or legal surrogate decision makers will be requested to provide a written informed consent prior to enrollment. Patients who withdraw their consent, those with upper extremity venous pathology, those with a baseline creatinine level equal to or above 3.5 mg/dL, those with severe stenotic valvular disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy will be excluded.
  3. Data Collection The study will start at participating centers on July 1, 2024.

Baseline variables Baseline variables will be entered to the electronic study form (RedCap).

Procedures A peripheral intravenous (IV) access, using an 18 to 22-gauge IV line, will be placed preferably to an upper extremity vein before enrollment. This line will be used to draw blood samples first. After blood samples were collected the subjects will be randomized to standard or PVP guided therapy groups. Randomization will be done using a computer-generated random allocation list via RedCap randomization module. The details of demographic characteristics, symptoms, physical examination findings and drug list will be noted to a standard electronic study form (see appendix). A routine electrocardiogram and echocardiogram will be performed at the earliest convenience.

After the blood samples were collected, line will be flushed carefully. PVP will be obtained by transducing a peripheral intravenous line after zeroing at the phlebostatic axis. The phlebostatic axis will be accepted as the midpoint between the anterior and posterior surfaces of the chest at the level of the fourth intercostal space meets with sternum, which is assumed to be correlated with the mid-level of the right atrium. The patient's arm will be placed parallel to the patient such that the position of the peripheral IV to be at the phlebostatic axis. Continuity of the peripheral IV line with the central venous system will be confirmed by demonstrating augmentation of the venous pressure waveform using manual or tourniquet circumferential occlusion of the extremity proximal to the catheter and modified Valsalva maneuver. If the pressure waveform failed to augment appropriately, data will not be collected, and the patient will be documented for study purposes as a technique failure. Daily fluid intake and output, weight, and biochemistry measurements, as required, will be done.

The patients in whom the first and the predischarge PVP cannot be measured due to technical issues (unable to provide upper extremity IV access, unable to confirm augmentation or Valsalva test) will be excluded from the study. Also, the patients requiring in-hospital intubation, high-dose inotrope or vasopressor infusion (≥10 mcg.kg-1.min-1 dopamine, dobutamine or equivalent), intraaortic balloon support, dialysis or veno-venous ultrafiltration will be excluded from the study (but these patients will be included in the in-hospital analyses).

In hospital diuretic treatment will be guided by ESC guidelines (see references). In the standard therapy arm, the treatment and the decision of discharge will be left to physicians' discretion. In the PVP-guided arm, a PVP < 9 mmHg will be targeted before discharge.

Outcomes The primary outcome of the study is the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization and all-cause emergency department visits. The secondary outcomes will include cardiovascular mortality, HF-related hospitalization, HF-related emergency department visits. This information on these outcomes will be obtained from the national electronic database. The follow-up duration is planned to be limited to one year.

Predefined secondary analyses

There will be subanalyses from the same cohort, as defined below:

  • The correlation between predischarge PVP and long-term outcomes. A multivariable analysis will also be executed for predicting the primary end point.
  • The correlation between the change in PVP during hospital stay and long-term outcomes. A multivariable analysis will also be executed for predicting the primary end point.
  • The correlation between the change in PVP during hospital stay and worsening renal function, renal injury, need for dialysis or veno-venous ultrafiltration.
  • The comparison of the two arms in terms of worsening renal function, need for dialysis or veno-venous ultrafiltration.
  • The comparison of the two arms in terms of EVEREST congestion score.
  • The comparison of the two arms in terms of the days in hospital.
  • The comparison of the two arms in terms of the number of repeat hospitalizations.
  • Usual patterns of diuretic use

Estimated number of subjects to be submitted:

We estimated that the enrollment of 621 participants would provide the study with a statistical power of 95% to detect a relative risk reduction of 26% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74) for the composite primary outcome (PVP-guided group: 40%, standard approach: 50%), using a two-sided test at the 0.05 significance level. This calculation assumes a 10% censoring rate and a 1-year follow-up period. The weighted event rate (πe=45%) was used to estimate the required number of events. To account for potential loss to follow-up and ensure robust analysis, the sample size was increased to 650 participants, maintaining equal allocation between groups (1:1 randomization).

Statistical Analysis Baseline characteristics will be summarized using standard descriptive statistics. Comparisons of relevant parameters between groups will be performed by chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U and student t-test, as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier analysis will be performed to determine the cumulative long-term mortality and composite outcome rates in subgroups. The mortality across groups will be compared using log-rank test. A Cox-regression model will be used to perform a survival analysis according to pre-discharge peripheral venous pressure and composite outcome. Baseline characteristics with a P value of 0.05 or less in the univariate analysis will be included and a step-down procedure will be applied for selection of final covariates. Statistical analyses will be performed with SPSS (version 24.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and MedCalc Software (version 18.2.1 [Evaluation version]; MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

650

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 6010
        • Recruiting
        • Ankara Etlik City Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Çağatay Tunca, MD
      • Antalya, Turkey, 07040
        • Recruiting
        • Antalya Ataturk State Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Antalya, Turkey, 07070
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Akdeniz University
      • Edirne, Turkey, 22030
        • Recruiting
        • Trakya University
        • Contact:
      • Erzurum, Turkey, 25040
        • Recruiting
        • Erzurum Atatürk University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Eskişehir, Turkey, 26080
        • Recruiting
        • Eskişehir City Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34303
        • Recruiting
        • Mehmet Akif Ersoy Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • İrem Türkmen, MD
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34668
        • Recruiting
        • Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Özlem Yıldırımtürk, Prof.
          • Phone Number: +902165424444
          • Email: ozlemyt@gmail.com
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 3440
        • Recruiting
        • Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yelda Saltan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yaser İslamoğlu, MD
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Sevgi Özcan, MD
          • Phone Number: 0 (212) 440 40 00
      • Izmir, Turkey, 35665
        • Recruiting
        • Bakırçay University, Faculty of Medicine
        • Contact:
      • Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, 46700
        • Terminated
        • Pazarcık State Hospital
      • Kars, Turkey, 36100
        • Recruiting
        • Kafkas University Health Research and Application Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Kütahya, Turkey, 43100
        • Recruiting
        • Kütahya Health Sciences University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Mevlüt Demir, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Emre B Erkip, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fevzican Doğru, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ahmet F Şahin, MD
      • Tokat, Turkey, 60030
        • Recruiting
        • Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
        • Contact:
      • Şırnak, Turkey, 73300
        • Recruiting
        • İdil State Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Hospitalization for heart failure (de novo or decompensated chronic heart failure) irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction
  • Age 18-99
  • Accept to participate

Exclusion criteria

  • A prior history of upper extremity venous disease
  • Serum creatinine ≥ 3.5 mg/dL
  • Severe stenotic valvular disease
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Withdrawal of consent
  • Indwelling central venous catheter,
  • Implanted left ventricular assist device
  • History of heart transplantation
  • Clinical diagnosis of cardiogenic shock
  • Any right-to-left shunt

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PVP-Guided
Peripheral venous pressure guided diuretic therapy arm
Diuretic therapy will be tailored according to peripheral venous pressure targets or standard approach
Active Comparator: Control
Standard dıuretic therapy arm
Diuretic therapy will be tailored according to peripheral venous pressure targets or standard approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary end point: Major adverse events (Mortality and rehospitalization)
Time Frame: One year
The difference in the combined rate of all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization and all-cause emergency department visits
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary combined end point:Major cardiac adverse events (Cardiac mortality and hospitalization)
Time Frame: One year
The difference in the combined rate of cardiovascular mortality, HF-related hospitalization, HF-related emergency department visits.
One year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PVP (discharge and delta) and long term outcomes
Time Frame: One year
The correlation between predischarge the absolute amount of pre-discharge peripheral venous pressure (PVP in mmHg) and the change in PVP (in mmHg) during hospital stay and the rate of adverse long-term primary outcomes. (The higher the absolute PVP, more adverse outcomes is hypothesized. The higher the change in PVP during hospital stay, less the rate of adverse events is hypothesized). A multivariable analysis will also be executed for predicting the primary end point.
One year
PVP (delta and cohort) and in-hospital renal outcomes
Time Frame: One year
The correlation between the change in PVP during hospital stay (in mmHg) and the rate of worsening renal function, renal injury, need for dialysis or veno-venous ultrafiltration.
One year
Congestion
Time Frame: One year
The comparison of the two arms in terms of EVEREST congestion score (EVEREST congestion score, range 0-18, the higher the score, the higher the congestion (worse outcome))
One year
Hospital stay
Time Frame: One year
The comparison of the two arms in terms of hospital stay (in days). Longer hospital stay duration is deemed as worse outome.
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BC&SSH-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD sharing may be considered upon personal application

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Diuretic therapy

Subscribe