Comparing CIMT With Virtual Reality to CIMT

Blinded, Randomized Trial Comparing Constraint Induced Movement Therapy With Virtual Reality to Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Alone and the Correlation of Patient Characteristics With Responsiveness to Intervention

This study is being done to compare constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) to CIMT combined with virtual reality technology (CIMT+VR) and its impact on how the children with unilateral cerebral palsy use their arm. CIMT is an intensive upper limb therapy for children with one sided (unilateral) cerebral palsy where the child wears a constraint (splint or mit) on their dominant hand so that they use the involved (weaker) side to do activities. Both groups will work on using both arms together to complete activities (bimanual training) as a way to transfer newly learned skills with one hand into two handed tasks. Assessments before and after the intervention will include clinical assessments (where a research team member observes the child doing tasks and ask questions), motion capture (where the child's movement is recorded using multiple cameras), and wearable sensors on the wrists (like a watch).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) to CIMT combined with virtual reality technology (CIMT+VR) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Both groups will also work on bimanual training (using both arms together to complete activities) as a way to transfer newly learned skills with one hand into two handed tasks. One group will receive CIMT, and the other group will receive CIMT and the VR technology. CIMT is an intensive upper limb therapy for children with unilateral (one sided) cerebral palsy where the child wears a constraint (splint or mit) on their dominant hand so that they use the involved (weaker) side to do activities. Participants in the CIMT+VR group of this study protocol will do everything the CIMT group does PLUS will utilize at least 4 of the following VR technologies each day of intervention: FitMi, Tyromotion Pablo Upper Extremity, Hocoma Armeo® Spring Pediatric, Nintendo Wii, and Parrot Drone.

FitMi is a neurorehabilitation device that provides visual feedback on motor performance as the individual interacts with wireless switches (Flint Rehab, 2020). The targeted areas of upper limb function for the study include grasp, release, and thumb opposition.

Tyromotion Pablo® Upper Extremity is a sensor based rehabilitation device with interactive therapies for the whole body. It provides targeted training for pronation/supination and force regulation for gross grasp, tip pinch, lateral and three point pinch (Tyromotion). The targeted areas of upper limb function for the study include supination, grip strength, and pinch strength.

Hocoma Armeo® Spring Pediatric is a device that combines the assistance of an exoskeleton and VR games created to improve hand function in the pediatric population. The Hocoma Armeo ® Spring Pediatric encourages repetitive movement of the UL with the aim of increasing quantity and improving quality of movements and can be customized for range of motion and the amount of gravity assistance the exoskeleton provides the child while playing the VR games. The targeted areas of upper limb function for the study include upper arm movement and wrist extension.

Nintendo Wii® is a video game console that uses a handheld pointing device that detects movement in three directions. The system requires the individual to hold the controller in the hand while moving the upper extremity. The targeted areas of upper limb function for the study include stabilize and hold. Parrot Drone is a stable quadcopter mini drone that can be flown indoors and outdoors. It has an autopilot feature that keeps the drone steady even if the user lets go of the controller. The drone can be controlled with a remote control or from a smart device that will target isolated finger and thumb movements.

Participants may exit the study prior to completion of the program due to non-compliance, social and economic barriers, disease progression, misdiagnosis or no longer meeting inclusion criteria. Caregivers may withdraw their child from the study at any time for any reason.

Participants enrolled in the study will complete (1) baseline assessments, including physical assessments with motion capture, which will require a visit to Scottish Rite for Children (SRC), (2) an upper limb intervention program that will require visits to Scottish Rite each weekday for two weeks, and (3) post-intervention assessments, including physical assessments with motion capture, that will require a visit to Scottish Rite, for a total of 12 visits. Assessment visits will each take about 3 hours and group intervention sessions will last 6 hours each day. Participants will also be asked as an option to wear an accelerometer (ActiGraph) on their wrists during waking hours (approximately 12 hours per day) 2-3 days before and after the intervention and during the 2 weeks of intervention for a total of 16-18 days. Total study duration for participants will be about 4 weeks

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75219
        • Scottish Rite for Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have cerebral palsy (a brain injury that causes muscle movement problems) or are a non-progressive brain injury to the developing brain and have difficulty using one of your arms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to complete assessment protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CIMT
Both groups will participate in 60 hours of intensive therapy over 10 days at SRC (6 hours per day Monday-Friday) following the established 'Pirate Camp' CIMT protocol. The full protocol can be found at: https://twu.edu/occupational-therapy/Camp-Based-Augmented-CIMT-Guide/. Both groups will participate in child friendly outdoor and indoor activities that promote the use of the involved side for example; parachute games, sock toss, penny pick up.
CIMT is an intensive upper limb therapy for children with unilateral (one sided) cerebral palsy where the child wears a constraint (splint or mit) on their dominant hand so that they use the involved (weaker) side to do activities
Other Names:
  • CIMT
Experimental: CIMT+VR
The CIMT+VR group will use the VR technology to work on upper limb motor skills for approximately two hours per day (4 of the activities described under Key Information at the beginning of this form) while the CIMT-only group will participate in traditional motor-based task-specific activities. Both the VR games and traditional intervention will target the improvement of the same upper limb domains.
Participants in the CIMT+VR group of this study protocol will do everything the CIMT group does PLUS will utilize at least 4 of the following VR technologies each day of intervention: FitMi, Tyromotion Pablo® UpperExtremity, Hocoma Armeo® Spring Pediatric, Nintendo Wii, and Parrot Drone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
assessment of bimanual hand skills in children with cerebral palsy well the involved hand performs during two handed activities,
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Melbourne Unilateral Upper Limb Assessment (MUUL)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
how well the involved hand works and active range of motion
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
ICF Brief Core Set for Cerebral Palsy
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention
Interview based on ICR Core Set
Baseline, pre-intervention
Hypertonia Assessment Tool Assessment Tool (HAT)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
tone assessment
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
Goal setting
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
sensory assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
assess sensory of hand stereognosis, two point discrimination, proprioception,
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
motion capture with electromyography (EMG)
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
while completing the AHA
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
option wearing of ActiGraphs on upper limbs
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
real time tracking of use of upper extremities
Baseline, pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU 2021-0271

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Constraint Induced Movement Therapy

Subscribe