Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for Improved Recovery After Exertion.

September 2, 2026 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for Improved Recovery After Exertion in Patients With Long/Post-COVID.

Widespread infection with SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in millions of people having Post-COVID. Post-COVID is a complex, non-monolithic disease with diverse clinical manifestations. Symptoms range from fatigue, brain fog, muscle aches and shortness of breath, affecting multiple organ systems simultaneously. To directly address this multi-organ component of Post-COVID, innovative treatment methods are urgently needed. One potential treatment that we will investigate in our study, is the intervention via the vagus nerve, as the cranial nerve plays a central role in communication between the body and the brain and influences targeted behavior. This innovative approach is based on our clinically relevant findings regarding the effects where acute tVNS increased the level of effort (Neuser et al., 2020; Ferstl et al., 2021), specifically targeting a key symptom of Post-COVID. In the proposed study, the investigators aim to investigate the effectiveness of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) as a non-invasive, self-administered treatment for Post-COVID symptoms at home. To evaluate the clinically relevant effects of repeated taVNS application (high-intensity stimulation), the investigators will employ a randomized cross-over design to investigate stimulation-induced changes in fatigue, depression and motivation to work for reward compared to low-intensity stimulation and to a control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed study aims to advance the understanding of Post-COVID treatment using a randomized cross-over design to evaluate the taVNS-induced changes over 12 weeks. A hundred twenty patients diagnosed with Long/Post-COVID are randomly assigned to one of three groups related to the two arms of the study ("Monitoring with low/high-intensity stimulation" vs. Monitoring without stimulation"). In the treatment group, forty patients will start with high-intensity taVNS for 6 weeks, then switch to low-intensity stimulation for an additional 6 weeks. Another 40 patients begin with low-intensity stimulation for 6 weeks, followed by high-intensity taVNS stimulation. The control group ("Monitoring without stimulation") is able to receive taVNS after participation in the study.

The treatment group and the control group will participate in the same monitoring procedures. All participants will attend an initial laboratory session to complete several baseline assessments, including questionnaires, measuring energy expenditure via indirect calorimetry and completing a body silhouette task. Blood samples are taken at every session to evaluate changes in metabolic and inflammatory markers. To assess the motivation to work for rewards, the investigators employ an effort-based-cost-benefit paradigm (Effort Allocation Task). All these lab assessments will be repeated after 6 and 12 weeks to evaluate stimulation-induces changes in primary and secondary outcomes. In addition, all participants are given a cardio bracelet to monitor physiological parameters (e.g. heart rate, heart rate variability, breathing, skin conductance, step counts) over the study period. Over the 12 weeks, the treatment group will self-administer taVNS for four hours daily in a targeted manner, anticipating forthcoming exertion and stimulating in anticipation of an effortful event to enhance the patients' motivational drive and recovery. Another essential part of the study is the monitoring over the 12 weeks. All participants will complete daily ecological momentary assessments via smartphone to monitor their mental states. In addition, participants will perform once a day one of two discounting games (effort or temporal discounting task) to investigate changes in their decision behavior over time. The effort discounting task is essential to assess the motivation of post-COVID patients to pursue subjectively effortful situations over the 12 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Translational Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hosptial Tübingen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • individuals who have previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection (preferred PCR-Test) or have a medically confirmed history of COVID-19 (preferred SARS-CoV-2 Antibody-test) and have persistent symptoms (including Post-COVID) .
  • clinical diagnoses made by physician: individuals are included with at least one persistent symptom for at least 4 weeks (Long-COVID) or at least 8 weeks (Post-COVID) following the SARS-CoV-2 infections, such as fatigue, shortness of breath, brain fog, headaches, irritability, cognitive difficulties, muscle or joint pain, sleep disturbances, etc.
  • Participants should not have an alternative explanation for their persistent symptoms, ruling out other medical or psychiatric conditions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of capacity for consent
  • insufficient German language skills: Participants must have sufficient (B2 German) language skills to understand the informed consent form, study procedures, and questionnaires.
  • Intensive Care Unit treatment during COVID-19 infection
  • BMI > 18.5 & BMI < 30 kg/m2

Lifetime (according to DSM 5):

  • brain injury, stroke, epilepsy, or history of seizures
  • schizophrenia
  • bipolar disorder
  • severe substance use disorders, except tobacco
  • cardiac arrhythmia, coronary heart disease
  • 12-month prevalence: pregnancy or nursing

Additional exclusion criteria for a safe application of tVNS:

  • active implant (pacemaker, cochlear implant, implanted electrode device) and cerebral shunts
  • required permanent use of left-sided hearing aid
  • ear infections, open wounds, or impaired skin at electrode sites

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Monitoring with high/low-intensity stimulation
The cross-over design includes one group which starts with high-intensity stimulation (n = 40) and another group, who starts with low-intensity stimulation (n = 40). The first group receives at first high-intensity for 6 weeks, followed by a low-intensity stimulation phase for 6 weeks. To control for placebo effects, other forty individuals start with the 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase followed by 6 weeks of high-intensity tVNS stimulation phase.
The study employs a CE-certified tVNS® E device, ensuring European safety standards (EU regulation 2017/745 on medical devices). This device features a stimulation cycle of 28 seconds on and 32 seconds off, with a 25 Hz impulse frequency. For the high-intensity group, the stimulation intensity will be individually adjusted in the session before starting the high-intensity tVNS stimulation at home. Recommended daily usage is max. 4 hours, after which it automatically shuts off.
Participants are monitored over 12 weeks using a combination of questionnaires and ecological momentary assessment. This approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of the patient's health and well-being.
The study employs the medically certified cardiowatch bracelet from Corsano (CE-MDR medical certification, FDA 510 (k) cleared) for continuous monitoring of vital signals, such as heart rate, heart rate variability, breathing rate, SpO2, physical activity and sleep.
Experimental: Monitoring without stimulation

Another group of patients is included as a control group (n = 40) undergoing 'treatment as usual' for Long/Post Covid. This group of participants receive the same monitoring throughout their participation during 12 weeks as the Stimulation-Group. As there is no standardized treatment protocol for Long/Post Covid, 'treatment as usual' implies a supportive approach.

This group of participants have the option to receive taVNS stimulation after participating in the study.

Participants are monitored over 12 weeks using a combination of questionnaires and ecological momentary assessment. This approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of the patient's health and well-being.
The study employs the medically certified cardiowatch bracelet from Corsano (CE-MDR medical certification, FDA 510 (k) cleared) for continuous monitoring of vital signals, such as heart rate, heart rate variability, breathing rate, SpO2, physical activity and sleep.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stimulation-induced changes in invigoration: frequency of button presses during the first seconds of the trial to gain monetary rewards in the Effort Allocation Task.
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in invigoration to work for rewards are operationalized as the relative increase in the frequency of button presses on an Xbox controller during the first seconds of the trial in the Effort Allocation Task.
Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in symptoms of depression
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in symptoms of depression are measured via the Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale. The MADRS comprises 10 items rated on a scale from 0 to 6 to compute a sum score with higher scores indicating severe symptoms of depression.
Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in physical and mental aspects of fatigue
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Changes in fatigue are measured by the Chalder Fatigue scale. The CFS comprises 11 questions rated on a 4-point Likert scale to compute a sum score.

It will be measured three times six weeks apart.

Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stimulation-induced changes in heart rate variability
Time Frame: during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Changes in heart rate variability are measured by a cardiowatch bracelet to evaluate autonomic nervous system activity.

It will be measured over three months daily.

during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in physical activity
Time Frame: during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Changes in physical activity are measured by step count per day, which are recorded by the cardiowatch bracelet.

It will be measured over three months daily.

during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in wanting the monetary rewards
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Changes in wanting monetary rewards are measured via a visual analogue scale rating after each effortful trial in the Effort Allocation Task.

It will be measured three times six weeks apart.

Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in exertion
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Changes in exertion are measured via a visual analogue scale rating after each effortful trial.

It will be measured three times six weeks apart.

Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in the motivation to invest effort: the discounting rate reflecting rewards devalued by effort
Time Frame: during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Changes in the motivation to invest effort is quantified by estimating the participant-specific discounting factor (k) and the inverse temperature parameter (β), which are derived by fitting the participant's observed choice behavior in the effort discounting task to discounting models.

It will be measured at least twice a week over three months.

during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in metabolic and inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Metabolic hormone levels and inflammatory markers are assessed from blood samples.

It will be measured three times six weeks apart.

Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Changes in health-related quality of life are measured by the Short-Form-12 health survey (SF-12), consisting of 12 questions (weighted sum score).

It will be measured three times six weeks apart.

Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in maintenance:the average relative frequency across the complete trial to gain monetary rewards in the Effort Allocation Task.
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in motivation to work for rewards are operationalized as the average relative increase in the frequency of button presses on an Xbox controller across the complete trial in the Effort allocation task.
Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in heart rate
Time Frame: during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in heart rate are measured by a cardiowatch bracelet depending on physical activity phases
during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in mood and mood response to effort
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in positive and negative mood ratings are measured with the questions of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) questionnaire on visual analog scales (0-100) four times within each experimental session. For each assessment (4x3 time points), all items will be included in the analyses as repeated measures for NA and PA, respectively.
Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in effort utility
Time Frame: Pre-treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Effort utility will be calculated as the correlation between trial-wise wanting ratings and effort maintenance (i.e., average button press frequency over the trial).
Pre-treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
stimulation-induced changes in self-reported depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in self-reported depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). The BDI consists of 20 items and a sum score is calculated across all items.
Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in HR
Time Frame: During 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
HR is measured continuously with the CardioWatch bracelet during the intervention phases between sessions. HR parameters will be calculated for ~1 h time intervals in which participants reported being at rest each day, to compare changes in resting HR.
During 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensor-based data will be included in exploratory analyses.
Time Frame: during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in sensory-based data are measured by a cardiowatch bracelet
during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in Questionnaires
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Questionnaires will be included in exploratory analyses and as a confounding variable.
Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in bodily symptoms
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Somatic symptoms across the body are assessed through the Body Sensation task (BST) in which participants have to indicate their physical sensations on a body silhouette.
Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in mood and motivation in daily life
Time Frame: during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in mood, metabolic, and physical states (25 items, Neuser et al. 2023) are continuously assessed using EMA questions before each discounting task on VAS scales (0-100). The main outcomes include mood assessed using mood state: (Happy - Sad)/100 and motivation (single item).
during 6-week tVNS compared to during 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Stimulation-induced changes in other self-reported symptoms of fatigue and physical complaints
Time Frame: Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Changes in physical symptoms and complaints are assessed using multiple questionnaires including the Long Covid-Questionnaire (20 items, sum score), the Fatigue severity scale (FSS, 9 items sum score), a visual analog scale for fatigue (1-10), the Post-Exertional Malaise Questionnaire (PEM-DSQ), Composite autonomic symptom Score 31 (COMPASS-31, 31 items, sum-score), Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale (SSD-12 items, sum-score), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15, 15 items, sum-score), Work-Ability-Index (WAI, 7 items, sum-score), and Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ, 30 items, and index between 0 and 1) in each session.
Pre treatment vs. after 6-week tVNS vs. after 6-week low-intensity stimulation phase
Associations of stimulation-induced changes with the amount of stimulation applied
Time Frame: Time of stimulation (in hours) was measured daily during the 6-week intervention phases between sessions.
To assess whether tVNS effects depend on the amount of time stimulation was applied by the participants, we will derive the total number of hours that the participants used the stimulation in the two stimulation phases (high- and low-intensity stimulation
Time of stimulation (in hours) was measured daily during the 6-week intervention phases between sessions.
Other Stimulation-induced changes in heart rate variability
Time Frame: Stimulation-induced changes (i.e., high-intensity vs. low-intensity vs. no stimulation) in hourly HRV were assessed daily during the 6-week intervention phases between sessions.
HRV is measured with the CardioWatch bracelet during the intervention phases between sessions. HRV parameters will be calculated for each hour of each day.
Stimulation-induced changes (i.e., high-intensity vs. low-intensity vs. no stimulation) in hourly HRV were assessed daily during the 6-week intervention phases between sessions.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nils B. Kroemer, Prof. Dr., Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen,Tübingen, 72076
  • Principal Investigator: Andreas J. Fallgatter, Prof. Dr., Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen,Tübingen, 72076

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe