Adaptive Cognitive Training on Cognitive Function in Elderly Hypertension Patients in the Community

December 5, 2025 updated by: Wuxiang Xie, Peking University

The Effects of COgNitive Training in Community-dwelling Older Adults at High Risk for demENTia and With Hypertension (CONTENT-Hypertension): a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

Objective A growing body of evidence supports hypertension as a risk factor for cognitive decline. Hypertension is significantly associated with accelerated cognitive decline, poorer cognitive function, and mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Cognitive training is an effective intervention to improve cognitive function. However, the current cognitive training does not fully consider the different areas and degrees of cognitive function impairmentof older adults. This study aims to evaluate the effect of adaptive cognitive training on cognitive function of older adults with hypertension in the community.

Participants aged 60 years or older, diagnosis of hypertension, and cognitive function assessment showed no dementia.

Design The study was designed as a double-blind randomized controlled trial. 120 hypertension participants without dementia aged 60 years or older in Shijingshan and Haidian, Beijing were included. Participants will be randomized to adaptive cognitive training (intervention group) and placebo cognitive training (control group) at a ratio of 1:1. Both training will be delivered by using PADs with the same appearance. The interventions will last for 12 weeks and follow up to 24 weeks, and both groups will be followed up on the same time schedules for all outcome measurements. The primary outcome is changes in MoCA scores from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.

The current trial has been reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (approval number: 2024-162).

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shijingshan
      • Beijing, Shijingshan, China, 100144
        • Xihuangcun Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

(1) Could not complete neuropsychological tests; (2) Suffering other disease or medication use might affect cognitive function, such as a new stroke within 6 months before baseline or use tranquilizers; (3) Unable to use PADs or unable to complete the training; (4) Unacceptable or refuse to participate in cognitive training; (5) Living in the same family with a subject who has been randomly assigned.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: adaptive cognitive training
The intervention lasted for 12 weeks. Participants will receive 30 minutes of training per day, at least five days per week. In each task, once a high accuracy (e.g. >80%) is achieved, the task is automatically upgraded to the next difficulty level.
The intervention was computerized, multi-domain, adaptive cognitive training. Training areas include processing speed, attention, perception, long-term memory, working memory, computation, executive control, reasoning, and problem-solving. Embedded in the Adaptive Cognitive training application is an adaptive algorithm that will help provide each participant with a cognitive training task at the right level of difficulty based on their profile and real-time performance.
Active Comparator: placebo cognitive training
The intervention lasted for 12 weeks. Participants will receive 30 minutes of training per day, at least five days per week. The tasks will be set to a fixed level of difficulty.
They received cognitive training tasks of fixed difficulty.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: baseline; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"
MoCA has been widely used in the cognitive function assessment of middle-aged and elderly people in China, including executive function, memory, orientation, computation, conceptual thinking, visual perception, language, attention and attention. The MoCA scale scores ranged from 0 to 30, and the lower the score, the worse the cognitive function.
baseline; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"; 24 weeks follow-up
Description:MoCA has been widely used in the cognitive function assessment of middle-aged and elderly people in China, including executive function, memory, orientation, computation, conceptual thinking, visual perception, language, attention and attention. The MoCA scale scores ranged from 0 to 30, and the lower the score, the worse the cognitive function.
baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"; 24 weeks follow-up
the Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"; 24 weeks follow-up
The TMT assesses cognitive processing speed and executive function. The TMT consists of two parts, A and B, and is one of the most widely used neuropsychological assessment tools. The TMT-A requires the subject to connect disorderly arranged numbers from 1 to 25 in order. The investigators used a modified version that included numbers in both square and circle figures and required participants to alternate the two figures when connecting the numbers in order. The score index was the time spent on TMT-A and TMT-B and the amount of interference (time spent on TMT-B - time spent on TMT-A).
baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"; 24 weeks follow-up
the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
Time Frame: baseline; 6 week-intervention; post-intervention, 12 weeks; 24 weeks follow-up
DSST has 1-9 numbers and corresponding symbols. Subjects were required to correctly fill in the symbols under the numbers according to the corresponding relationship between numbers and symbols in the 90s content. One point was calculated for every one completed within 90 seconds, and the higher the score, the better the cognitive function.
baseline; 6 week-intervention; post-intervention, 12 weeks; 24 weeks follow-up
the WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test(AVLT)
Time Frame: baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"; 24 weeks follow-up
AVLT consisted of 15 words, which were read aloud at a rate of one word in 2 seconds while the subject listened. After reading aloud, the subjects were asked to recall the words as much as possible for 90 seconds, and the recall did not have to be in the order of reading aloud. During the recall process, the examiner recorded the correct words and their number, inserted and repeated words. The above reading and immediate recall were repeated 5 times. The total score of AVLT recall from 1 to 5 passes was the total score of immediate recall. Delayed recall and cued recall were also performed, and distractor exclusion recall was performed.
baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"; 24 weeks follow-up
the Boston Naming Test (BNT)
Time Frame: baseline; 6 week-intervetion; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"; 24 weeks follow-up
There were 30 pictures in the BNT, and subjects were required to name the pictures, each of which was scored on a scale of 0-2. Two points were given for complete correctness, one point for semantic errors, and zero points for other situations. The sum of the scores of all objects gives a total score, with a maximum score of 60.
baseline; 6 week-intervetion; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"; 24 weeks follow-up
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time Frame: baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"
Description:GDS describes the participant's depressive symptoms in the past week on a scale of 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"
GAD-7 assesses the anxiety of the participants in the past two weeks, with a total of 7 items. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.
baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"
Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)
Time Frame: baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"
PSQI assesses the subjective sleep quality of participants in the past month. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
baseline; 6 week-intervention; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"
Blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured using an Omron J-710 sphygmomanometer. Blood pressure will be measured three times with at least 30 seconds between each measurement.
baseline; "post-intervention, 12 weeks"

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Trial outcome data and essential baseline characteristics data are available upon request. Researchers interested in accessing the trial dataset should contact the corresponding author with details of their proposed research use. Data access will be provided subject to review and approval of the research protocol and execution of a data use agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on adaptive cognitive training

Subscribe