Establishing Optimal PEEP Setting for Obese Patients in the Steep Trendelenburg Position

September 17, 2025 updated by: Tinashe Maduke

Establishing Optimal PEEP Setting for Obese Patients in the Steep Trendelenburg Position: a Pilot Study.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Enlight 2100 electrical impedance tomography (EIT) belt can optimize positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during surgery better than standard anesthesia machines.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a measure taken intraoperatively to manage breathing during surgery. The Enlight 2100 is a device that uses electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to measure PEEP and provide a live image of the lungs while a patient is mechanically ventilated. In this study, the investigators will use the Enlight 2100 EIT belt to measure PEEP intraoperatively in order to better optimize PEEP settings for difficult cases.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2
  2. Age > 18 years
  3. Scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position.
  4. Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently pregnant.
  2. Presence of pacemaker, neurostimulator, spinal cord stimulator, or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
  3. Skin ulcerations on upper torso near the belt placement.
  4. Presence of phrenic nerve palsy or other diaphragm conditions.
  5. Thoracic circumference > 134 cm.
  6. Tracheomalacia.
  7. Inability to speak and understand English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PEEP Belt
PEEP belt will be placed on the patient intraoperatively. All patients will be monitored using anesthesia machines as standard of care.
Belt will be placed on the nipple line of the patient prior to the surgery start in the operating room. Data will be collected prior to the initial incision after the patient has been intubated, and then at the end of surgery before the patient has been extubated.
Other Names:
  • EIT belt
  • electrical impedance tomography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimal PEEP
Time Frame: From the time of consent to the end of surgery, assessed up to 24 hours.
Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) measured using the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) belt during surgery.
From the time of consent to the end of surgery, assessed up to 24 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between EIT and standard of care measured PEEP
Time Frame: From the time of consent to the end of surgery, assessed up to 24 hours.
Measured difference between optimal positive end-expiratory pressure from the study device and the standard of care anesthesia machines.
From the time of consent to the end of surgery, assessed up to 24 hours.
Delays in extubation
Time Frame: From the day of surgery to discharge, up to 1 week
Number of delays in extubating the patient due to breathing complications during surgery.
From the day of surgery to discharge, up to 1 week
Incidence of extubation complications
Time Frame: From the day of surgery to discharge, up to 1 week
Number of reintubations needed and/or failed extubations after surgery.
From the day of surgery to discharge, up to 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tinashe Maduke, MD, MPH, University of Missouri-Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Peep Belt

Subscribe