- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03334799
Biomechanical Effects of Wearing a Sacroiliac Belt in Women
A Case-Control Pilot Study on the Biomechanical Effects of Wearing a Sacroiliac Belt in Women
Study Overview
Detailed Description
SacroIliac (SI) joint dysfunction (also called pelvic girdle pain) has been associated with impaired load transfer across the lumbopelvic region. This can result in lower back pain as well as poor biomechanical adaptation during walking. Sacroiliac (SI) belts have typically been prescribed in order to mitigate pain and improve load transfer in individuals with SI joint dysfunction. It has been speculated that SI belts have the ability to instantaneously increase joint stability, and as a result improve load transfer and muscle activation and recruitment. However, this speculation is primarily based on anecdotal evidence; there is little biomechanical research supporting the effects of wearing an SI belt. In order to gain an improved understanding of the biomechanical effects of wearing an SI belt, the investigators propose to conduct a study with the following key objectives:
- Determine if there are differences with respect to neuromuscular, kinematic, or pressure patterns during walking and/or standing between healthy stable individuals and individuals with SI joint dysfunction
- Determine if wearing an SI belt affects neuromuscular, kinematic, or pressure patterns during walking and/or standing in women with sacroiliac instability
Variables measured will include:
- Kinematics will be collected to quantify posture and joint angles
- Kinetics will be collected to quantify ground reaction forces
- Plantar pressure will be collected to quantify force distribution and center or pressure
- Joint moments (Lumbar-pelvic and Hip) will be added as variables. The investigators will use inverse dynamics to calculate various joint moments during walking.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Females
- Individuals with isolated SI joint dysfunction
- Individuals with shoe size 6, 7, 8 or 9 US
and matched controls by age (within 5 years), BMI (within one point) and parity
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy in the last year or presently pregnant
- Significant lumbar dysfunction
- Significant hip dysfunction
- Leg length discrepancy of 1 cm or more
- Women who have previously undergone prolotherapy or SI joint injections
- Women with previous lower back, hip, knee or ankle surgery
- Inability to stand for 60 sec unaided or to walk unaided.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SCREENING
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
OTHER: Sacroiliac belt on and off
Belt on and belt off
|
standing and walking with the belt on and with the belt off
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Explore if 95% confidence ellipse area of the center of pressure or kinematic measures can distinguish women with PGP from women without PGP when a SI belt is applied
Time Frame: within 2 months of enrollment, measured at one point in time
|
Pressure insoles will be used to quantify the 95% confidence ellipse area of the CoP determined from each of the 2 feet, during the 30 second standing trials.
The sampling will be compounded at a rate of 100 Hz and provided a time-pressure series with a range from 15 to 1200 kPa.
The 95% confidence ellipse area of both feet will be summed.
The average of the 3 trials will be used.
Kinematic data will be collected using eight high speed video cameras at a sample rate of 240 Hz.
All test subjects will be equipped with a marker set consisting of 32 light reflecting markers according to Visual3D (C-Motion, Inc., Germantown, USA) marker set guidelines.
All measurements will be made on the right side.
Walking speed will be monitored using photo electronic cells.
Identified and averaged for 10 over-ground walking trials for each participant using custom Matlab software (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).
|
within 2 months of enrollment, measured at one point in time
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
95% confidence ellipse area of the center of pressure
Time Frame: within 2 months of enrollment, measured at one point in time
|
Pressure insoles (Pedar, novel GmbH, Germany) will be used to quantify the 95% confidence ellipse area of the CoP determined from each of the 2 feet, during the 30 second standing trials.
The sampling will be compounded at a rate of 100 Hz and provided a time-pressure series with a range from 15 to 1200 kPa.
Prior to testing, the insoles will be calibrated as per the manufacture's protocol.
All data will be analyzed using custom Matlab scripts.
The 95% confidence ellipse area of both feet will be summed.
The average of the 3 trials will be used.Gait variability will be assessed by calculating the average position of the CoP in the medial-lateral direction during walking using pedar pressure insoles.
The mean and standard deviation of the average CoP position will be defined as gait variability in medial-lateral direction calculated for each subject, foot, and condition.
|
within 2 months of enrollment, measured at one point in time
|
kinematic changes of lower extremity
Time Frame: within 2 months of enrollment, measured at one point in time
|
A force plate (Kistler Instrumente AG, Switzerland) recording at 2400 Hz will be positioned in the middle of a 15 meter walkway to measure ground reaction forces (GRF) during standing and walking. The threshold for determining heel strike wil be 20 N. Walking speed will be monitored using photo electronic cells (model TC Timing System; Brower Timing Systems, Draper, UT). Discrete kinematic and kinetic variables will be identified and averaged for 10 over-ground walking trials for each participant using custom Matlab software (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Kinematic data will be collected using eight high speed video cameras (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, USA) Version 3.6.1.1315 at a sample rate of 240 Hz. All test subjects will be equipped with a marker set consisting of 32 light reflecting markers according to Visual3D (C-Motion, Inc., Germantown, USA) marker set guidelines. All measurements will be made on the right side. |
within 2 months of enrollment, measured at one point in time
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Magali Robert, Foothils Hospital Cumming School of Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14-2323
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pelvic Girdle Pain
-
Foundation University IslamabadActive, not recruitingPregnancy Related Pelvic Girdle PainPakistan
-
Helse Stavanger HFUniversity of StavangerCompletedPelvic Girdle Pain Post Partum | Low Back Pain Post PartumNorway
-
Muş Alparlan UniversityCompletedPregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle PainTurkey
-
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu BranchNational Taiwan University Hospital; National Taiwan UniversityRecruitingPelvic Girdle PainTaiwan
-
YI-JU TSAICompletedPelvic Girdle PainTaiwan
-
Loyola UniversityAmerican Academy of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationTerminatedPelvic Girdle PainUnited States
-
Centro Hospitalar Tondela-ViseuMarta Fernandes, M.D. MSc; Sonia Gonçalves, M.D; José Damasceno Costa, M.D.; Antonio... and other collaboratorsCompletedPelvic Girdle PainPortugal
-
Helse Stavanger HFUniversity of StavangerCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedPelvic Girdle PainPakistan
-
Loyola UniversityCompletedPelvic Girdle PainUnited States
Clinical Trials on sacroiliac belt
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back PainUnited States
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityBezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruiting
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedLow Back Pain | Sacroiliac StrainCanada
-
University of PlymouthCompletedPelvic Pain | Symphysis Pubis DysfunctionUnited Kingdom
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedDizziness ChronicUnited States
-
Ochsner Health SystemGlobus Medical IncWithdrawnSacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction | Sacroiliac; Spondylitis
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalEndo Tools Therapeutics S.A.Not yet recruitingObesity | Obesity, Morbid | Weight, Body | Metabolic DiseaseUnited States
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCompletedRotator Cuff Impingement SyndromeCanada
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTerminatedObstructive Sleep Apnea | Stroke, IschemicCanada