- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06521060
The Role of Pre-Surgical Tru - Cut Biopsy in the Management of Atypical Myometrial Lesions (MYSTR)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A total of 250 patients is planned to be enrolled, accounting for an estimated 15% dropout rate. Study data will be collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) open-source platform, which allows for the secure collection of research data via a web-based interface. REDCap was developed by Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, is used by Charles University in Prague under a standing agreement to allow the usage of REDCap for academic and research purposes. The REDCap platform environment is compliant with 21 CFR Part 11, FISMA, HIPAA, and GDPR.
Patients will be identified at each of the participating site. If a patient meets all inclusion criteria, she will be informed about the study and asked to sign an informed consent (ICF). All patients referred for TCB will have their blood count and baseline coagulation parameters checked prior to performing the biopsy to eliminate bleeding complications. All patients will undergo a standard-of-care ultrasound examination with a focus on the description of the fibroid with atypical features according to the MUSA statement and/or Basel sarcoma scale score (BSS). A patient will be included in the study if she will meet one or more of the following MUSA criterion: irregular tumor borders, cystic areas in the lesion (as a sign of central necrosis), nonuniform echogenicity, moderate-to-abundant intralesional vascularity and an absence of calcifications, and/or BSS total score ≥ 1.
The patient will be further referred to MRI imaging (optional) and will undergo TCB within 4 weeks after US exam. In selected centers which will decide to participate in this optional part of the trial, all patients with ≥ 1 MUSA criterion and/or BSS total score ≥ 1 based on the US examination will be referred for MRI imaging. Images will be acquired with 3T MRI. The sequences parameters (Sagittal T2, Coronal T2, Axial T2, Axial DWI, Axial T1 3D DIXON, Axial Perfusion T1 3D, Axial T1 3D DIXON post contrast) will be evaluated in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Two experienced readers in gynecologic oncology imaging will review all MRI images and calculate the MRI score.
The tru-cut biopsy is performed as an out-patient procedure without the need of any anesthesia in lithotomic position. Using an automatic biopsy gun and 18-gauge disposable core tissue biopsy needle four tissue cylinder samples are taken from the tumor. If the localization of the lesion and anatomical conditions allow, the transcervical approach without breaking the continuity of the perimetrium is preferred. If the lesion is localized in the uterine doom, or targetable by the uterine cavity, the transcervical canal approach is feasible and should be considered. If both above-described methods are not feasible, a transvaginal approach is also possible. In all cases transvaginal US is used for correct navigation. Patients will be observed for 30 minutes following the biopsy and then discharged. Other follow up of the patients will be done 24 hours and two weeks after the procedure via phone with the assessment of the patient´s pain, overall experience, and eventual complications.
Intraoperative and early post-procedural complications will be evaluated, and adverse events will be assessed on the 14th post-TCB day according to the Clavien-Dindo Surgical complications classification. Pain will be assessed during the TCB, 30 minutes after the procedure, and after 24 hours using the Numeric rating scale (NRS). Overall experience will be assessed using questionnaire: FACIT-TS-G (Version 4) 30 minutes after the procedure.
Specimen evaluation will be conducted at each participating site by dedicated, experienced pathologist according to standard diagnostic procedures. The biological nature of spindle cell leiomyocellular tumors will be determined according to Table 2 (modified from the WHO classification of female genital tumors 2020).
If necessary, immunohistochemical or molecular examination will be used. For smooth muscle lesions the gene mutation status of PTEN, pRb, TP53, MTAP, ATRX, and DAXX will be analyzed. In lesions of other histological types, RNA next-generation sequencing will be performed, optionally accompanied by immunohistochemical examination. These examinations are routinely performed as a part of standardized diagnostic procedures and will not be covered by the project's expenses. Histology findings from other than the main sight that will fail to meet the characteristics of conventional leiomyoma (either from TCB or definitive histology result) will undergo a second evaluation at the main site by a senior gyneco-pathologist. Following samples will be stored in biobanks at each respective institution: tumor sample DNA (isolated from one snap-frozen TCB sample); representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue block and representative FFPE non-tumor myometrial tissue block (both harvested during curative surgery). All samples will be collected with the intention to be used for future translational and exploratory research, including studies that aim to evaluate the association between biomarkers and clinical-surgical-pathological characteristics. All samples will be stored in the biobank at the respective institution. Participation in the translatory part is not obligatory for the trial participation but is highly recommended. A separate consent form will be provided to the patient to obtain permission for all biological material storage and future translational studies. Based on the histology result obtained from the TCB, patients will be categorized into three groups. Subsequent clinical management will be determined according to the appropriate group:
Subgroup 1: Patients with a typical benign histological result of TCB will undergo elective surgery within 8 weeks from receiving the results, with a preference of a minimally invasive approach, i.e., most often laparoscopic myomectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Subgroup 2: Patients with an atypical histological result of TCB (i.e., other than conventional leiomyoma but with no signs of malignancy) will undergo elective surgery within 6 weeks from receiving the results, with a preference of laparoscopy but excluding unprotected power morcellation of pathological tissue.
Uncontained morcellation will be used strictly for tumors with benign TCB histology and nonsuspicious perioperative appearance of resected uterine tumor. Contained morcellation technique will be strictly preferred for all other tumors, i.e., with non-standard TCB histology and/or atypical or suspicious perioperative appearance, or standard TCB histology and atypical or suspicious perioperative appearance.
Subgroup 3: Patients with a histological result from the TCB that are clearly malignant or suspicious for malignancy undergo open surgery, specifically abdominal hysterectomy. In cases of women with incomplete reproductive plans, open resection of the tumor may be performed after detailed consultation with the oncogynecological team and the patient, a secondary hysterectomy may be added based on the result of definitive histology. The procedure should be done as soon as possible, with a maximum interval between the result of TCB histology and elective surgery no more than 3 weeks.
In cases of tumors without penetration through the uterine serosa (according to US and perioperatively) and without requiring morcellation for the specimen evacuation, total laparoscopic hysterectomy can be performed.
Subgroup 4: In case of invalid TCB histology result, the patient will undergo contained morcellation during laparoscopic procedure or open surgery within 4 weeks after the TCB.
The definitive histology results from the surgery will be evaluated using the same histopathological criteria as in TCB histology. Definitive histology will be compared with the histological results from the pre-surgical TCB.
For the primary endpoint analysis, the accuracy of the histological results from TCB will be established using the definitive postoperative histological results as a reference standard.
The sample size of 217 patients with sonographically atypical myometrial lesions was calculated to establish the accuracy of the diagnostic method, with the degree of estimate precision of 0.07, 95% confidence and 80% power; assuming ratio between patients with/ without atypical lesion as per final pathology of 23:77, as based on the retrospective database data. Considering a possible dropout or unavailability of data in 15% of the patients, the final sample size reaches 250 patients. Analysis was computed using PASS 13 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2014). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA, ncss.com/software/pass.
If this trial proves the accuracy of TCB of myometrial lesion, it could provide a new diagnostic tool and significantly impact the clinical practice.
A positive study outcome could establish level A evidence for a change of international standards and implement prehabilitation into a routine clinical practice. On a national level, the study aims to standardize and improve the care for gynecological patients with sonographic atypical myometrial lesions. A primary endpoint final analysis is intended for publication in a top medical journal. The study could also provide prospective genomic characterization analyses of myometrial tumors as well as the exploratory analysis of the reliability of individual imaging methods in the preliminary selection of patients with atypical myometrial findings.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kristyna Hlinecka
- Phone Number: +420605413210
- Email: Kristyna.Hlinecka2@vfn.cz
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Zdenka Lisa
- Phone Number: +420605413210
- Email: zdenka.lisa@vfn.cz
Study Locations
-
-
-
Praha, Czechia, 12800
- General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Women indicated for uterus-preserving surgery (tumour resection) or hysterectomy for myometrial lesion ('myoma-like' uterine tumour(s))
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed informed consent
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Women indicated for uterus-preserving surgery (tumour resection) or hysterectomy for myometrial lesion ('myoma-like' uterine tumour(s))
- USG finding of atypical myometrial lesion/s a
Exclusion Criteria:
patient 's refusal
- age < 18 years
- ongoing pregnancy
- inability to perform TCB /contraindications for TCB (trombocytopenia, coagulopathy, PID, colpitis) or definitive surgery (myomectomy or hysterectomy)
- USG finding of more than 2 atypical lesion/s with a diameter ≤ 20 mm and ≥ 100 mm
- inability to perform any of the 3 core needle biopsy approaches (transvervical, trans uterine cavity, transvaginal) because of anatomical, localization issues. The percutaneous transabdominal biopsy is not allowed
- Polymyomatous uterus that may not be examined adequately with routine transvaginal ultrasound
- myoma (which would be subject to TCB) type 7 according to FIGO classification 16
- history of conservative hormonal therapy less than 3 months prior to study enrolment
- history of conservative therapy via uterine artery embolisation or laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
- history of pregnancy less than one year prior to study enrollment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Tru cut biopsy
A single arm, prospective, multicentric cohort study.
A total of 250 patients is planned to be enrolled, accounting for an estimated 15% dropout rate.
|
Proving that preoperative TCB could provide accurate information about the histological nature of the tumor would have great impact for setting an adequate, tailored, oncologically safe treatment approach.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of accuracy
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Accuracy is defined as the concordance of the results of preoperative histology from TCB with the result of definitive histology from the operative specimen
|
3 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of adequately performed TCBs
Time Frame: 3 years
|
defined as the number of TCBs with adequate encroachment of the lesion with bioptic needle (by the US) and sufficient tissue sample for the histopathological analysis to the total number of TCBs.
|
3 years
|
|
Number of complications
Time Frame: 3 years
|
number of complications after TCB divided by the number of patients.
Intraoperative and early post-procedural complications will be assessed using a questionnaire.
Adverse events will be assessed 14th post-TCB day according to the Clavien-Dindo Surgical complications classification
|
3 years
|
|
Pain associated with TCB
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Assessment of patient´s pain during, 30 minutes after, and 24 hours after the procedure using the Numeric rating scale (NRS)
|
24 hours
|
|
Comparison of the preoperative MRI examination to US imaging
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Testing the superiority of either approach, sensitivity and specificity of the MRI imaging when compared to US examination will be analyzed
|
3 years
|
|
Patient satisfaction with the diagnostic MRI and TCB
Time Frame: 3 years
|
1 questionnaire: Patient experience of the diagnostic modalities will be assessed using developed and validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
|
3 years
|
|
Impact of TCB on clinical management
Time Frame: 3 years
|
the change of clinical management of patients with uterine "myoma-like" tumors caused by the TCB histology results (frequency of open surgeries and rate of necessary use of contained morcellation during laparoscopic myomectomy or hysterectomy)
|
3 years
|
|
Frequency of non-standard histological findings
Time Frame: 3 years
|
the frequency of atypical histological findings (other than conventional leiomyoma) from the results of definitive histology in the group of women with sonographically atypical initial findings
|
3 years
|
|
Validation of the US markers of atypical myometrial lesions
Time Frame: 3 years
|
External validation of the MUSA statement and/or Basel sarcoma scale score (BSS), correlation of respective imaging score and final pathology result
|
3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kristyna Hlinecka, Charles University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Stewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017 Sep;124(10):1501-1512. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640. Epub 2017 May 13.
- Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A, Van Schoubroeck D, Landolfo C, Installe AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Gordts S, Benacerraf B, D'Hooghe T, De Moor B, Brolmann H, Goldstein S, Epstein E, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;46(3):284-98. doi: 10.1002/uog.14806. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
- Ludovisi M, Moro F, Pasciuto T, Di Noi S, Giunchi S, Savelli L, Pascual MA, Sladkevicius P, Alcazar JL, Franchi D, Mancari R, Moruzzi MC, Jurkovic D, Chiappa V, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Epstein E, Fruhauf F, Fischerova D, Fruscio R, Ciccarone F, Zannoni GF, Scambia G, Valentin L, Testa AC. Imaging in gynecological disease (15): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of uterine sarcoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;54(5):676-687. doi: 10.1002/uog.20270. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
- Abdel Wahab C, Jannot AS, Bonaffini PA, Bourillon C, Cornou C, Lefrere-Belda MA, Bats AS, Thomassin-Naggara I, Bellucci A, Reinhold C, Fournier LS. Diagnostic Algorithm to Differentiate Benign Atypical Leiomyomas from Malignant Uterine Sarcomas with Diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):361-371. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191658. Epub 2020 Sep 15. Erratum In: Radiology. 2020 Dec;297(3):E347. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020209020.
- Bonneau C, Thomassin-Naggara I, Dechoux S, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouzier R. Value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the characterization of uterine mesenchymal tumors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Mar;93(3):261-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12325.
- Kubik-Huch RA, Weston M, Nougaret S, Leonhardt H, Thomassin-Naggara I, Horta M, Cunha TM, Maciel C, Rockall A, Forstner R. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Guidelines: MR Imaging of Leiomyomas. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3125-3137. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5157-5. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
- Kawamura N, Ichimura T, Ito F, Shibata S, Takahashi K, Tsujimura A, Ishiko O, Haba T, Wakasa K, Ogita S. Transcervical needle biopsy for the differential diagnosis between uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma. Cancer. 2002 Mar 15;94(6):1713-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10382.
- Tamura R, Kashima K, Asatani M, Nishino K, Nishikawa N, Sekine M, Serikawa T, Enomoto T. Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of 63 uterine tumors having high signal intensity upon T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Jul;24(6):1042-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000189.
- Verschuere H, Froyman W, Van den Bosch T, Van Hoefs M, Kaijser J, Van Schoubroeck D, Van Rompuy AS, Vergote I, Timmerman D. Safety and efficiency of performing transvaginal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy for pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jun;161(3):845-851. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.026. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
- Mascilini F, Quagliozzi L, Moro F, Moruzzi MC, De Blasis I, Paris V, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Testa AC. Role of transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jan;30(1):128-132. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000734. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
- Wang L, Li S, Zhang Z, Jia J, Shan B. Prevalence and occult rates of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 14;99(33):e21766. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021766.
- Raffone A, Raimondo D, Neola D, Travaglino A, Giorgi M, Lazzeri L, De Laurentiis F, Carravetta C, Zupi E, Seracchioli R, Casadio P, Guida M. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;165(1):22-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15136. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
- Knipprath-Meszaros AM, Tozzi A, Butenschon A, Reina H, Schoetzau A, Montavon C, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Manegold-Brauer G. High negative prediction for the Basel sarcoma score: Sonographic assessment of features suspicious of uterine sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;174:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 19.
- De Bruyn C, Ceusters J, Vanden Brande K, Timmerman S, Froyman W, Timmerman D, Van Rompuy AS, Coosemans A, Van den Bosch T. Ultrasound features using MUSA terms and definitions in uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma: cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;63(5):683-690. doi: 10.1002/uog.27535. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
- Bell SW, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994 Jun;18(6):535-58.
- Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Noble BN, Kho RM. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):566.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
- Suzuki Y, Wada S, Nakajima A, Fukushi Y, Hayashi M, Matsuda T, Asano R, Sakurai Y, Noguchi H, Shinohara T, Sato C, Fujino T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading System for Preoperative Diagnosis of Leiomyomas and Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(3):507-513. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.660. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
- Cotrino I, Carosso A, Macchi C, Baima Poma C, Cosma S, Ribotta M, Viora E, Sciarrone A, Borella F, Zola P. Ultrasound and clinical characteristics of uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMPs). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Aug;251:167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 May 25.
- Richtarova A, Boudova B, Dundr P, Lisa Z, Hlinecka K, Zizka Z, Fruhauf F, Kuzel D, Slama J, Mara M. Uterine smooth muscle tumors with uncertain malignant potential: analysis following fertility-saving procedures. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 May 1;33(5):701-706. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004038.
- Giuliani E, As-Sanie S, Marsh EE. Epidemiology and management of uterine fibroids. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Apr;149(1):3-9. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13102. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
- Stukan M, Rutkowski P, Smadja J, Bonvalot S. Ultrasound-Guided Trans-Uterine Cavity Core Needle Biopsy of Uterine Myometrial Tumors to Differentiate Sarcoma from a Benign Lesion-Description of the Method and Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 29;12(6):1348. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061348.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NW24J-03-00025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Leiomyosarcoma
-
Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingLocally Advanced Leiomyosarcoma | Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma | Stage III Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Unresectable Leiomyosarcoma | Uterine Corpus LeiomyosarcomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedMetastatic Leiomyosarcoma | Unresectable Leiomyosarcoma | Uterine Corpus LeiomyosarcomaUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMetastatic Leiomyosarcoma | Stage III Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Unresectable Leiomyosarcoma | Stage IIIA Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand ParisCompletedUterus Leiomyosarcoma | Soft Tissue LeiomyosarcomaFrance
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMetastatic Leiomyosarcoma | Unresectable LeiomyosarcomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingLocally Advanced Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma | Metastatic Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma | Stage III Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Unresectable Uterine Corpus LeiomyosarcomaUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong...Zhejiang Cancer Hospital; Xiangya Hospital of Central South University; Fudan... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationAdvanced LeiomyosarcomaChina
-
Stanford UniversityActive, not recruitingUterine Leiomyosarcoma | LMS - LeiomyosarcomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingStage III Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Uterine Corpus Leiomyosarcoma AJCC v8 | Uterine Corpus LeiomyosarcomaUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalJazz PharmaceuticalsActive, not recruitingAdvanced Soft-tissue Sarcoma | Metastatic Soft-tissue Sarcoma | Advanced Leiomyosarcoma | Leiomyosarcoma MetastaticUnited States
Clinical Trials on tru cut biopsy
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentGeotek Medical Products Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., Ankara, TürkiyeCompleted
-
General University Hospital, PragueRecruiting
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome... and other collaboratorsRecruitingCervical Cancer | Ovarian Neoplasms | Ovarian Cancer | Metastatic Cancer | Pelvic Cancer | Endometrial Cancer | Ovarian Carcinoma | Uterus Cancer | Sarcoma UterusBelgium, Czechia, Italy, Sweden
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease | Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisUnited States
-
Udo SechtemTerminated
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedMechanical Ventilation Complication | Diaphragm InjuryFrance
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Region SkaneRecruitingProstate Cancer (Diagnosis)Sweden
-
Modarres HospitalCompleted