A Scalable, Teacher-delivered, School-based Oral Health Intervention for Pakistani Lower Secondary Schoolchildren

April 13, 2026 updated by: Arshed Muhammad, Universiti Putra Malaysia

A Scalable, Equity-focused, Teacher-delivered, School-based Oral Health Intervention for Pakistani Lower Secondary Schoolchildren: a Pragmatic Cluster-randomized Effectiveness-implementation Trial (Smile Smarts-PK)

This was a pragmatic, two-arm, and parallel-group, superiority cluster-randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation of clusters (schools) to either the Smile Smarts-PK intervention arm or the control arm. The trial settings were lower secondary schools (classes 5-8) in the Punjab, Pakistan. Punjab is the most populous province of Pakistan; it has many public and low-cost private schools that serve lower- and middle-income communities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Oral diseases are among the most common non-communicable conditions affecting children worldwide and disproportionately burden those in low- and middle-income countries. Robust evidence from pragmatic, theory-informed, school-based cluster-randomized trials in South Asia remains scarce. We evaluated the effectiveness of Smile Smarts-PK, a scalable teacher-delivered oral health intervention embedded within routine lower secondary school systems in Pakistan.

Methods It is a parallel, pragmatic, school-level cluster-randomized controlled trial in 50 lower secondary schools in Pakistan. Schools were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the Smile Smarts-PK intervention or usual school practice. The intervention was teacher-delivered, integrated into routine academic schedules, and informed by the Health Belief Model. Primary outcomes at 12 months were clinical oral health indices: Debris Index-Simplified (DI-S), Calculus Index-Simplified (CI-S), Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S). Secondary outcomes included plaque index, children's oral health knowledge, observed and self-reported oral health behaviours, and maternal knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Analyses were by intention to treat using linear mixed-effects models accounting for clustering at the school level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4055

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Sialkot, Punjab Province, Pakistan
        • District Sialkot

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 10 to 15 years. Enrollment at one of the selected schools.
  • Consent obtained from parents or legal guardians for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children and their parents who did not give assent and consent to participate in the study.
  • Children with severe oral health issues require immediate medical attention.
  • Children with special needs affecting their ability to participate in the oral health education interventions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Smile Smarts-PK
The intervention group is given the Smile Smarts-PK intervention. It is s a multi-theory, multicomponent oral health promotion intervention grounded in a multi-level theoretical framework integrating the Health Belief Model (HBM) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). In addition, the delivery strategy is viewed through an implementation science lens, implementation theory, to strengthen understanding not only of effectiveness but also of reach, adoption, fidelity, and future maintenance.
The interactive oral health care lessons provided to participants in Arm 1 would involve activities and discussions aimed at changing behaviors such as tooth brushing frequency, brushing techniques, and the use of interdental aids. The intervention aims to educate and motivate participants to adopt and maintain optimal oral hygiene habits through behavioral change strategies.
No Intervention: Control group
Participants assigned to Arm 2 serve as the control group and do not receive any intervention during the study except for routine school activities

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral Hygiene Status
Time Frame: 12 month
The change in the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) from baseline to 12 months served as the primary endpoint. The OHI-S scores debris and calculus on six index surfaces (scores 0-3 each), with the summed component means creating an overall score ranging from 0 (good hygiene) to 6 (poor hygiene). Scores were categorized as good (0.0-1.2), fair (1.3-3.0), or poor (3.1-6.0). The primary analysis focused on the change in mean OHI-S score at both the individual and cluster levels
12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PLAQUE SCORE
Time Frame: 12 months
The secondary outcome is Plaque score will be measured using the Silness and Löe plaque index. This index scores the thickness of dental plaque at the gingival margin. The scoring range is from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no plaque and 3 indicating a high amount of plaque accumulation.
12 months
Observed toothbrushing performance
Time Frame: 12 months
The change in toothbrushing performance from baseline to 12 months was assessed using a validated 12-item checklist. Each item was scored from 0 (poor) to 2 (good), yielding a total score of 0-24, categorized as poor (0-11), fair (12-17), or good (18-24). Analysis focused on changes in mean scores and the proportion of children in each category.
12 months
Self-Reported Oral Hygiene Behaviors
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in self-reported oral hygiene behaviors from baseline to 12 months were measured using a validated 12-item questionnaire covering brushing frequency and fluoride use. Total scores ranged from 0 to 24, with classifications of poor (0-11), fair (12-17), or good
12 months
Mothers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP)
Time Frame: 12 months
The third secondary outcome was the assessment of change in mothers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to oral hygiene from baseline to 12 months. Data were collected using standardized Likert-scale and multiple-choice items. Response formats, including true/false, Likert scales, and multiple-choice questions, were standardized to allow calculation of summary scores: knowledge (% correct), attitudes (mean Likert score), and practices (categorical frequencies).
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation outcomes
Time Frame: 12 months
Mixed methods (surveys, interviews, administrative data) to assess how well an intervention is adopted, delivered (fidelity), and sustained
12 months
Equity
Time Frame: 12 months
Equity was assessed across PROGRESS-Plus-informed dimensions through prespecified interaction analyses and by comparing changes in outcome gaps between more and less advantaged groups.
12 months
Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility
Time Frame: 12 months
Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were assessed using the validated 4-item AIM, IAM, and FIM scales (each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree), with higher scores indicating more favourable implementation outcomes.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MUHAMMAD ARSHED, PhD, University of Lahore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adolescent

Clinical Trials on Smile Smarts

Subscribe