- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06524453
Exercise Program for Individuals With SCI in Community
Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of a Rehabilitation Exercise Program for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury in Community: A Randomized Controlled Trials
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
People with SCI must perform regular exercise to improve function, quality of life, and reduce medical costs. However, SCI people with reduced mobility have difficulty exercising on their own without proper guidance in the community. Rehabilitation exercise for SCI people should be applied based on accurate functional assessment, and risk factors related to exercise should also be assessed. Community-based exercise programs are effective in removing various barriers such as lack of exercise programs, lack of experts, and lack of facilities.
This study aims to verify the effectiveness and safety of a systematically designed customized exercise program for SCI people who live in the community and want to participate in exercise. Based on the results of many previous studies, the investigators expect that program participants will have improved cardiopulmonary endurance and quality of life. Our study results will serve as a basis for creating an environment where more people with SCI can continue to exercise preemptively and in the long term.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeongnam
-
Yangsan, Gyeongnam, Korea, Republic of, 50612
- Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spinal cord injury patients who are 19-65 years old or above and residing in the local community
- Individuals who can not walk independently for more than 10 meters without assistance from others
- Individuals whose elbow extensor strength is greater than muscle manual test (MMT) Fair
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who have difficulty understanding the exercise program or expressing their symptoms
- Individuals who cannot participate in the intervention exercise program due to serious cardiovascular diseases
- Individuals who are deemed unsuitable for this study by a specialist in rehabilitation medicine due to other medical conditions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exercise group
A 20-session structured rehabilitation exercise program for individuals with SCI
|
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
Maintain their daily lives without any intervention
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
6 minute push test
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance.
Longer distances indicate better athletic ability.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal cord independence measure III
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Tool to evaluate independence of spinal cord injury patients.
The total score ranges from 0 to 100, and the higher the score, the more independent the patient is.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Modified functional reach test
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Assessing balance in sitting posture.
Measures the maximum distance a person can extend forward while sitting in a fixed posture.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Force applied by the hand to pull on or suspend from objects.
It is widely used to assess sarcopenia and as a surrogate indicator of muscle strength.
Measured in kg, the higher the value, the stronger the grip is considered.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Arm curl
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Tests upper limb endurance.
Measures the number of times a participant can hold a dumbbell (4kg for men, 2kg for women) for 2 minutes and fully bend and straighten their arms.
The higher the number, the better the function and strength.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Back scratch test
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Measures how close the hands can be brought together behind the back.
If the fingertips touch then the score is zero.
If they do not touch, measure the distance between the finger tips (a negative score), if they overlap, measure by how much (a positive score).
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Beck anxiety inventory
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Anxiety measuring tool.
Each item is scored 0-3 points, with a total score of 0-63 points.
A score of 0-7 indicates minimal anxiety, a score of 8-15 indicates mild anxiety, a score of 16-25 indicates moderate anxiety, and a score of 26-63 indicates severe anxiety.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Beck depression inventory
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Depression measuring tool.
Each item is scord 0-3 points, with a total score of 0-63 points.
A score of 0-13 indicates minimal depression, a score of 14-19 indicates mild depression, a score of 20-28 indicates moderate depression, and a score of 29-63 indicates severe depression.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Fat-free mass from bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
A method used to measure the components of the body.
It is the total amount (kg) of body components excluding body fat, and the higher it is, the better the body composition is interpreted.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Fat-free mass index from bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
A method used to measure components of the body.
This is an indicator that standardizes fat-free mass according to body size.
The higher it is, the more muscle mass and the better health.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
Percent body fat from bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
A method used to measure the components of the body.
The normal range varies depending on age and gender.
The lower the score within the general normal range, the better the health.
The higher it is, the higher the risk of obesity related diseases.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
skeletal muscle mass from bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
A method used to measure the components of the body.
Normal range varies depending on age and gender.
The higher it is within the general normal range, the better the health.
The lower it is, the higher the risk of lack of strength and sarcopenia.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
|
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Self-report survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Converting the patient's response results using quality weights has a value between 0.000 and 1.000.
A higher score means a higher quality of life.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 8-weeks of exercise program
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Sung-Hwa Ko, PhD, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SCI exercise RCT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation
-
Mississippi State UniversityUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterNot yet recruitingPostoperative Rehabilitation | Hand Injury RehabilitationUnited States
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalRecruitingStroke Rehabilitation | Stroke Rehabilitation and CaregiversTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Asan Medical CenterRecruitingPulmonary Rehabilitation | Cardiac RehabilitationKorea, Republic of
-
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterNational Paralympic Committee Germany (NPCG)CompletedCardiac Rehabilitation | Feasibility Studies | Organization and Administration | Rehabilitation ExerciseGermany
-
University Hospital, ToursCompletedPulmonary Rehabilitation | Respiratory RehabilitationFrance
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompleted
-
Orton Orthopaedic HospitalCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingRehabilitationUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Bruyere Research InstituteBruyere Academic Medical OrganizationRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Wheelchair accessible exercise program
-
Kaohsiung Medical UniversityNational Science Council, TaiwanCompleted
-
Kaohsiung Medical UniversityNational Science Council, TaiwanCompleted
-
University of California, IrvineEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Laval UniversityNot yet recruitingMyotonic Dystrophy Type 1 | Wheelchair Mobility | ARSACS | Manual Wheelchair Skills TrainingCanada
-
KU LeuvenCompleted
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Completed
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Completed
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedConfidence Using a WheelchairCanada
-
Laval UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of California, Los AngelesRecruiting