A New Fast DWI-based MR Protocol for Surveillance in Patients With a High Risk of Ovarian Cancer Recurrence During PARP-inhibitors Maintenance to Enhance Secondary Cytoreduction Results (FOFU)

A New Fast DWI-based Magnetic Resonance Protocol for Surveillance in Patients With a High Risk of Ovarian Cancer Recurrence During PARP-inhibitors Maintenance to Enhance Secondary Cytoreduction Results

In ovarian cancer (OC), complete surgical debulking and platinum-based chemotherapy are the standard treatment, now followed by maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors or Bevacizumab. However, in advanced-stage ovarian cancer, recurrence is common, with a progression-free survival of about 16 months. Secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) at the time of recurrence prolongs the overall survival and gives the possibility to extend the use of PARP-i. SCS is possible only when recurrence has limited extension. However, in OC, there is no well-established and widely accepted scheme for surveillance during maintenance therapy; ESMO guidelines suggest physical examination for the follow-up and allow ultrasound, CT, PET-CT and MRI to confirm the recurrence and plan surgical treatment if appropriate.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with OC in surveillance after first-line treatment usually have a scheme of clinical visits and serum marker evaluation every three months, associated with alternated transvaginal ultrasound and chest, abdomen and pelvis CT with contrast every three months and MRI with a confirmatory role in some cases.

We will use an abbreviated MR protocol of the abdomen (the most common location of relapse and the only one that can be treated by surgery) in association with CT. The abbreviated protocol is based on axial b50, b600 and b900 DWI with three-dimensional coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstruction of b900 values, ADC maps and axial single-shot T2-weighted sequences, which will take less than 20 minutes. This MRI protocol does not need contrast injection and does not add any risk for patients.

Any positive findings will be discussed at the Multidisciplinary Tumour Board and secondary cytoreductive surgery will be evaluated. Surgery outcome and subsequent clinical information (secondary PFS and OS) derived by normal clinical practise will be registered in a dedicated database.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Roma, Italy, 00168
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitaro "A. Gemelli" IRCCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a diagnosis of HGSOC with BRCA wild-type, without residual tumour after first debulking surgery, who are planned for CT/MRI exams as for Follow Up Clinical Practice, after more than 6 months since the last platinum-based therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with BRCA wild-type, HRP, high-grade serous ovarian cancer
  • No residual tumour at first debulking surgery
  • More than 6 months since the last platinum-based therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who will not consent to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cytoreductive surgery rate
Time Frame: 36 months
Optimal cytoreductive surgery rate
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance rate between MRI results and CA125 variations
Time Frame: 36 months
Percentage of Concordance between MRI results and CA125 variations
36 months
Concordance between MRI results and CT findings
Time Frame: 36 months
Percentage of Concordance between MRI results and CT findings
36 months
Rate of Survival
Time Frame: 36 months
Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Rate
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Giacomo Avesani, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on Magnetic resonance imaging as fpr clinical practice

Subscribe