Brain Responses to Short-Chain Fatty Acid Intervention (MoodBugs HDAC)

August 6, 2024 updated by: Lukas Van Oudenhove, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

The Effect of a Short-Chain Fatty Acid Intervention on Affective Brain Circuits and Neuroepigenetics

A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effect of colon-delivered short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) on neural responses to stress and neuroepigenetics.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The goal of this interventional study is to study the underlying mechanism of the attenuating effect of colon-delivered SCFAs on the cortisol response to stress. Pre-clinical studies suggest that the histone-deacetylase (HDAC)-inhibiting properties of SCFAs are the main mechanism underlying SCFA-induced changes in stress, cognition and behavior.

Primary objective: to test the effect of colon-delivered SCFA intervention versus placebo on HDAC expression in the brain and neural responses to stress

Secondary objective: to determine the effects of colon-delivered SCFA administration versus placebo on inflammatory and autonomic responses to stress and to determine the mediating and/or moderating factors that potentially underlie SCFA-induced changes to stress responses (HDAC expression in stress-responsive regions, serum SCFA levels)

To this end, 32 participants will be asked to undergo a pre- and post-intervention visit, separated by one week intervention with either colon-delivered SCFAs or placebo (16 per group). During the study visits, participants undergo simultaneous PET-MR imaging with [11C]Martinostat. They undergo the Montreal Imaging Stress Test (MIST) and the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) at each visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ/KU Leuven
        • Contact:
          • Lukas Van Oudenhove, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
  2. Proficiency in English and/or Dutch
  3. Access to a -18°C freezer (i.e. ordinary household freezer)
  4. Male participants
  5. Age 18-45 years
  6. BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant has a history of previous or current neurological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal or endocrine disorder
  2. Any disorder, which in the Investigator's opinion might jeopardise the participant's safety or compliance with the protocol (as assessed by medical staff on the research team)
  3. Any prior or concomitant treatment(s) that might jeopardise the participant's safety or that would compromise the integrity of the study
  4. Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device
  5. Current or recent (3-month) medication use (especially antibiotics, cardiovascular drugs, steroids, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, centrally effective drugs)
  6. Current or recent (1-month) infection (e.g. common cold, influenza, COVID-19, etc.)
  7. Recent (1-month) vaccination (e.g. flu shot, SARS-COV-2 vaccine, etc)
  8. Smoking
  9. Night-shift work
  10. Adherence to special diets (e.g. vegan, vegetarian, weight-loss, lactose-free, gluten- free, etc.)
  11. Use of pre- or probiotics within one month preceding the study
  12. Previous experience with any of the tasks used in the study (not including questionnaires)
  13. Neuroimaging contraindications
  14. If the participant invokes that he does not want to be informed of eventual pathology that might be found during imaging (invokes the "right not to know")

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Short-Chain Fatty Acids
SCFAs will be delivered directly to the colon using pH-dependent colon delivery capsules
Colon-delivery capsules of Short-Chain Fatty Acids will be administered in a ratio of 60:20:20, thus 150 mmol of acetate, 50 mmol of propionate and 50 mmol of butyrate equivalent to 20g of fibers, once daily, one week
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Colon-delivery capsules of microcrystalline cellulose
Microcrystalline Cellulose will be used as placebo, one daily, one week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HDAC expression
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Brain HDAC expression will be quantified using the PET radiotracer [11C]Martinostat before and after the intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Brain response to stress
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Brain response (brain oxygenation level-dependent signals) to a fMRI-adapted stress task will be measured before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain metabolite concentration
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Relative quantification of brain metabolites (mmol/L) using 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Serum short-chain fatty acid levels
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Quantification of serum SCFA (μM) before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Salivary cortisol response to stress
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Biological stress sensitivity is measured by quantifying cortisol levels (ng/ml) from multiple saliva samples taken before, during, and after a stress task performed during the pre-intervention and post-intervention visit
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Cytokine levels
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Quantification of inflammatory cytokines (pg/ml) before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
C-reactive protein levels
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Quantification of hs-C-reactive protein levels (ng/ml) before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Assessing heart rate variability (ms) with ECG before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Assessing blood pressure (systolic/diastolic mmHg) with a blood pressure monitor before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Heartbeat
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Assessing heartbeat (bpm) with a blood pressure monitor before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Self-reported stress
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Psychological stress sensitivity is measured through stress reports of the participants using the visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS scorings are taken before, during, and after a stress task performed during the pre-intervention and post-intervention visit.
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fecal gut microbiota profile
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Assessing gut microbiota profile before and after intervention
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Assessing ratings on PSS. PSS scores range between 0-40 with higher scores indicating worse outcome
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Assessing ratings on the subscales of GSRS and its total score. It has 5 subscales (Reflux, Diarrhea, Constipation, Abdominal Pain, and Indigestion Syndrome). Subscale scores range from 1 to 7 and higher scores indicates a worse outcome.
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Big Five Inventory 10 (BFI-10)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Measuring the Big Five personality traits, including Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Openness.
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Generic Assessment of Side Effects
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
General side effects will be assessed and recorded in a structured, validated approach using the Generic Assessment of Side Effects (GASE)54. The GASE consists of 36 items asking for most frequently reported side effects for drugs based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database from all countries. Symptoms of all body parts during the last seven days will be self-reported and rated based on severity from 0 (not present) to 3 (severe).
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Assessing momentary (state) anxiety during the pre- and post-intervention visit. This inventory is part of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) with 20 questions specifically for state anxiety, rated on a 4-point scale. State anxiety is rated with anxiety absent and anxiety present questions. Anxiety absent questions constitute the absence of anxiety in a statement like, "I feel secure." Anxiety present questions represent the presence of anxiety in a statement like "I feel worried." The 4-point scale are as follows: 1 'not at all', 2 'somewhat', 3 'moderately so', and 4 'very much so'.
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
designed to assess individual differences in the habitual use of two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
an instrument to measure the quality and patterns of sleep in adults. . It differentiates "poor" from "good" sleep by measuring seven domains: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction over the last month.
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
The Cognitive Assessment Questionnaire (CAQ)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
to assess the frequency with which people experience cognitive failures, such as absent-mindedness, in everyday life - slips and errors of perception, memory and motor functioning. The questionnaire has 25 items which are scored from Never (0), Very rarely (1), Occasionally (2), Quite often (3) to Very often (4). A total score as well as three subscales (Forgetfulness, Distractibility, False Triggering) can be calculated.
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
Mainz Inventory for Microstressors (MIMIS)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, on average 2 years
retrospective assessment of microstressors over one week covering both stressor occurence and perceived stressor intensity
Throughout study completion, on average 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lukas Van Oudenhove, MD, PhD, KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Kristin Verbeke, Pharm, PhD, KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Boushra Dalile, PhD, KU Leuven
  • Study Director: Annalena Fuchs, MSc, KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will become available upon publication with no time limitations.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be publicly available.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Short-Chain Fatty Acids

Subscribe