Human Factoring Validation of Pulsenmore ES Device

August 19, 2024 updated by: PulseNmore

Human Factoring Validation Testing of the Pulsenmore ES Home Ultrasound Monitoring Device for Conducting Fetal Scans During Pregnancy

The goal of this study is to conduct human factors validation testing with the Pulsenmore ES home Ultrasound device in the video-guided mode of operation (participants) and the clinician-guided mode of operation (participants and healthcare professionals (HCP)) to evaluate whether the device/user interface can be used by the intended users without any serious issues or errors under that intended use and actual use conditions. The intended users will be qualitatively assessed via observation and cognitive debrief and usability testing methodology. Participants will be remotely observed during the video-guided fetal scanning actual process and participants and HCPs will be remotely observed during the clinician-guided fetal scanning actual process.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90404
        • Center for Fetal Medicine and Women Ultrasound
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants usability study will recruit singleton pregnant woman, gestational age (14-38 weeks) across al BMI groups and up to BMI 40.

The healthcare professional (HCP) usability study will include only the first time the HCP performs the clinician-guided session.

Description

Inclusion Criteria for participants:

  • The participant has voluntarily provided and signed the informed consent form (ICF)
  • The participant has voluntarily provided authorization and signed the Videography and Photography Release form
  • The participant is able to speak, read, write and comprehend US English and resides in the United States of America
  • The participant to have adequate communications skills
  • Pregnant women > 18 years of age
  • A singleton gestation
  • Gestational age between 14 to 38 weeks with a prior scan demonstrating fetal viability and confirming dates
  • Maximum BMI of 40
  • Willing and able to participate in a 60-75 min video and is willing to be audio recorded for the post-procedure interview

Inclusion criteria for HCP:

  • The HCP has voluntarily provided and signed the HCP consent information sheet (CIS)
  • The HCP has voluntarily provided authorization and signed the HCP Videography and photography Release form
  • The HCP is able to speak, read, write and comprehend US English and resides in the United States of America.
  • The HCP has adequate communications skills
  • The HCP is willing and able to participate in one 60 min video call and is willing to be audio recorded during the interview.

Exclusion Criteria for participants:

  • Multiple gestation
  • Skin problem(s) in the abdominal area (such as wounds, cuts in the skin and skin rash)
  • The participant has a visual or hearing impairment, and/or a condition that affects her motor and/or cognitive skills, that would prevent her from independently performing a fetal ultrasound scan at home
  • The participant has a language barrier that can affect the communication and compliance to the usability study requirement
  • Uncontrolled and untreated psychiatric conditions for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening,
  • Alcohol or drug dependence with current symptoms
  • Previous Pulsenmore ES trials and have previously used the Pulsenmore ES device
  • Known fetal and genetic anomalies.

Exclusion criteria for clinicians:

  • The HCP has a visual or hearing impairment, that would prevent him or her from independently directing a fetal ultrasound scan
  • The HCP has a language barrier and/or in the opinion of the recruiting interviewer provides any reason to believe that compliance with the study requirements will not be achievable
  • The HCP has participated in in previous Pulsenmore trials and have previously used the Pulsenmore ES device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Video guided
Participants will perform a scan using Pulsenmore ES device in the video mode independently following video tutorial. Participants will be remotely observed during the scan and interviewed by a human factoring researcher right after
Fetal Ultrasound scanning using Pulsenmore ES device followed with an interview by a human factoring researched
Clinician guided
Participants will perform a scan using Pulsenmore ES device either in the clinician guided mode, guided by a health care professional via a telehealth visit. Participants and healthcare professionals will be remotely observed during the scan and interviewed by a human factoring researcher right after
Fetal Ultrasound scanning using Pulsenmore ES device followed with an interview by a human factoring researched

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety issues while using Pulsenmore ES device
Time Frame: One day
Any safety issue, either serious that could cause serious injury or death to the user, or non serious
One day
User error while using Pulsenmore ES device
Time Frame: One day
Any user interface issues reported by study participants and HCPs that can cause delay in diagnosis or treatment
One day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan Dallabrida, SPRIM Pro

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SPRIM 22-1200

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Related

Clinical Trials on Pulsenmore ES home ultrasound

Subscribe