- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06567730
Comparison of Canine Retraction Using Ni-ti Closed-coil Springs Vs Elastomeric Power Chains During Orthodontic Treatment
Comprehensive Comparison of Canine Retraction Using Nickel-titanium Closed-coil Springs Versus Elastomeric Power Chains During Orthodontic Treatment - A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled
The objective of this study is to compare the canine retraction rate (in mm with a 100 mm marked scale) using Ni-Ti closed-coil springs versus elastomeric power chains during canine retraction in subjects with first premolar extractions over a period of three months.
After the extraction of all first premolars under local anesthesia. For canine retraction, Ni-Ti closed-coil springs and elastomeric power chains will be randomly allocated to the right and left quadrants of both arches.
Radiographic measurement (root resorption) and clinical measurements (canine retraction, plaque accumulation and gingival health) will be recorded at four points in time. First, at the start of the canine retraction (T0), after first month (T1), second month (T2) and third month follow-up (T3).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
RATIONALE:
Premolar extraction followed by canine retraction is one of the common practices in orthodontics to treat malocclusion such as severe crowding and proclination of anterior teeth. It is essential to know methods and techniques that result in minimum or no adverse effects on roots of teeth and periodontal health. This will help the clinicians to choose the best method that will result in a faster and more physiological closure of extraction spaces. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, limited studies have compared the effects of Ni-Ti closed-coil springs and elastomeric power chains on canine root resorption, gingival health and plaque accumulation. It is necessary to establish a comparison between these methods, as it can help clinicians to provide better care and enhance the overall effectiveness of orthodontic treatment.
OBJECTIVE:
Primary Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the canine retraction rate (in mm with a 100 mm marked scale) using Ni-Ti closed-coil springs versus elastomeric power chains during canine retraction in subjects with first premolar extractions over a period of three months.
Secondary Objective: This study will also include an assessment of canine root resorption (in mm using periapical radiograph), dental plaque accumulation and gingival health (according to indices mentioned below with CPI-TN probe) using Ni-Ti closed-coil springs versus elastomeric power chains during canine retraction in subjects with first premolar extractions over a period of three months.
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference between Ni-Ti closed-coil spring and elastomeric power chain on the canine root resorption, retraction rate, dental plaque accumulation and gingival health in subjects with first premolar extractions.
Alternate Hypothesis: There is a significant difference between Ni-Ti closed-coil spring and elastomeric power chain on the canine root resorption, retraction rate, dental plaque accumulation and gingival health in subjects with first premolar extractions.
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:
After obtaining an approval from the Ethical Review Committee and taking informed consent and informed assent from the parents and child respectively, these patients will be recruited in the study as participants. Patients visiting the orthodontic clinic at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi will be included in this study. Detailed information regarding the study will be provided to the participants and they will be given the choice to either accept or refuse their inclusion in the study. After the extraction of all first premolars under local anesthesia, 0.018" stainless steel archwires will be inserted in the maxillary and mandibular arches. For canine retraction, Ni-Ti closed-coil springs and elastomeric power chains will be randomly allocated to the right and left quadrants of both arches. Radiographic measurement (root resorption) and clinical measurements (canine retraction, plaque accumulation and gingival health) will be recorded at four points in time. First, at the start of the canine retraction (T0), after first month (T1), second month (T2) and third month follow-up (T3). Canine retraction rate will be recorded by using a 100 mm marked scale. Data will be collected on an organized study proforma
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Munnal Gulzar, BDS
- Phone Number: 03343536106
- Email: munnal.gulzar@aku.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mubassar Fida, BDS,FCPS
- Phone Number: 021-34866641
- Email: mubassar.fida@aku.edu
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 13 - 40 years
- Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment
- Patients requiring all first premolars extraction as part of orthodontic treatment
- Patients with all permanent teeth present and erupted (except for second and third molars)
- All patients who will sign the informed consent/assent form
Exclusion Criteria:
• Patients with systemic diseases that can affect tooth movements
- Patients with uncontrolled periodontal disease
- Patients with craniofacial syndromes
- Pregnant or lactating mothers
- Patients with bracket failures greater than three times per bracket during the study
- Patients on medications that can affect tooth movements
- Patients with Nickel allergy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ni-ti closed Coil spring
For canine retraction, Ni-Ti closed-coil springs will be randomly allocated to the right and left quadrants of both arches
|
Ni-Ti closed-coil spring is a passive compressed spring made up of super elastic Nickel-titanium.
Two eyelets are attached to each side of the coil to facilitate its application.
The eyelets will be engaged in the hooks of the second premolar and canine brackets and will apply a force of 150 gm.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Elastomeric power chain
For canine retraction, elastomeric power chains will be randomly allocated to the right and left quadrants of both arches
|
Elastomeric power chains are resilient and latex-free orthodontic materials.
They are made up of elastic material and consist of many connected rings.
Each ring is engaged in a bracket to apply a force of 175-300 gm.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Canine retraction rate
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The retraction rate of canine will be the distance travelled divided by the time interval needed for closure of spaces.
It will be noted at four-time intervals i.e at the start of the canine retraction (T0), after first month (T1), second month (T2) and third month follow-up (T3).
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Root resorption
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Root resorption is a decrease in root length and width due to an inflammatory process.
In orthodontics, during tooth movement, areas of necrosis develop called hyalinized areas, which result in root resorption.
Periapical radiographs will be taken to assess the amount of root resorption by determining the length of the tooth from the cusp tip to the root apex
|
3 months
|
|
Gingival health
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Gingival index is a grading system that is used to assess the health of the gingiva.
It consists of four grades including, Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3.
The increase in grade indicates the compromised gingival health of the teeth.
|
3 months
|
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Plaque index is a grading system used to assess the amount of plaque present at the gingival margins and helps in assessing oral health.
It consists of four grades including, Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3.
The increase in grade indicates the increased amount of plaque along the gingiva.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mubassar Fida, BDS,FCPS, Aga Khan University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kulshrestha RS, Tandon R, Chandra P. Canine retraction: A systematic review of different methods used. J Orthod Sci. 2015 Jan-Mar;4(1):1-8. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.149608.
- Wazwaz F, Seehra J, Carpenter GH, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT. Duration of canine retraction with fixed appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Feb;163(2):154-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
- Makhlouf M, Aboul-Ezz A, Fayed MS, Hafez H. Evaluating the Amount of Tooth Movement and Root Resorption during Canine Retraction with Friction versus Frictionless Mechanics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Feb 5;6(2):384-388. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.066. eCollection 2018 Feb 15.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-9110-28139
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gingivitis
-
University of BelgradeActive, not recruitingPeriodontitis | Gingivitis and Periodontal DiseasesSerbia
-
State University of New York at BuffaloRecruiting
-
NovoBliss Research Pvt LtdGuruNanda LLCNot yet recruiting
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityRecruitingPeriodontitis | Gingivitis and Periodontal DiseasesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ankara UniversityThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeyCompletedPlaque-Induced GingivitisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Colgate PalmoliveFederal University of PelotasCompletedGingivitis | Dental Plaque | Dental Plaque Induced Gingivitis | Dental Plaque and GingivitisBrazil
-
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka...CompletedChronic Gingivitis, Plaque InducedBangladesh
-
University of SaskatchewanCompletedChronic Gingivitis | Chronic Gingivitis, Plaque InducedCanada
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakNot yet recruitingPregnancy GingivitisIndia
-
Zainab J AbbasCompleted
Clinical Trials on Ni-ti Closed-coil Spring
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownEn-masse Retraction , Class I Bimaxillary Protrusion
-
Soroka University Medical CenterUnknownAttention Deficit Disorder PatientsIsrael
-
Al-Azhar UniversityNot yet recruitingOrthodontic Patients Indicated for Upper First Premolar Extraction | Orthodontic Patients Indicated for Maxillary Canine Retraction
-
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarRecruitingPneumoperitoneum | Morbid Obesity | Bariatric Surgery CandidateIndia
-
Universidade Federal de SergipeCompletedToothache | Tooth SensitivityBrazil