Digital Navigators for Acceptance and Competence Development with Mental Health Apps (DigiNavi)

August 29, 2024 updated by: Laura Uchtmann, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if and how so called "Digital Navigators" (DN) can help general practitioners, outpatient psychiatrists and psychologists as well as their treated patients to use digital mental health apps (DiGAs) and integrate it into their treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What are the chances and implementation barriers of DN?
  • What are the acceptance and expectations towards DN?
  • Do DN affect the psychological health of patients?
  • Do DN affect the digital health literacy and technical competence of participants?

Employees of medical teams (e.g. medical assistants) receive training to become a DN. Afterwards patients are accompanied and supported by the DN for 12 weeks to select and use a suitable app for their mental disorder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study aims to promote the use of digital health applications (DiGAs) to improve mental health and provide timely treatment for underserved populations. Currently, DiGAs are only used by a small proportion of patients and practitioners in Germany. In order to solve this care problem, employees of medical teams, such as medical assistants, are to be trained as so-called 'digital navigators'. These digital navigators support stakeholders in the selection and use of mental health apps, impart the necessary digital skills, improve adherence and relieve the burden on those providing treatment.

As part of the pilot project, digital navigators will be implemented as an example in GP and outpatient psychiatric care in a rural region of Brandenburg. Firstly, a preliminary study will be conducted to determine the acceptance and expectations of the digital navigators using interviews and focus groups. The researchers then complete a training program at Harvard Medical School and adapt the 'Harvard Digital Navigator Training' to the German framework conditions. This adaptation process is supported by discussion groups with patients and practitioners.

In the next step, medical assistants in six study centres will receive the adapted training. A central tool available to them is the DiGAnavigator.de website, a guide for DiGAs. The digital navigators help with the integration of DiGAs into the treatment of 48 patients with mental illnesses and accompany them over a period of 12 weeks.

Finally, the implementation will be evaluated. The evaluation analyses the implementation hurdles and the effects on the eHealth literacy of patients and professionals. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHeals) and the Digital Health Literacy Index (DHLI) will be used for this purpose. An accompanying process evaluation analyses the acceptance, effects and implementation barriers of the digital navigators. In addition, both patients and staff are surveyed regarding their digital and technical skills as well as their willingness and ability to change before and after the intervention. Furthermore, the severity of the patients' illness will be recorded and compared before and after the intervention using validated scales. To ensure sustainable implementation, the long-term aim is to provide accredited training to become a digital navigator.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Brandenburg
      • Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg, Germany, 14776
      • Eberswalde, Brandenburg, Germany, 16225
      • Fürstenwalde, Brandenburg, Germany, 15517
        • Recruiting
        • Psychiatrische Institutsambulanz (PIA) Fürstenwalde
        • Contact:
      • Fürstenwalde, Brandenburg, Germany, 15518
      • Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg, Germany, 15562
        • Recruiting
        • Psychiatrische Institutsambulanz (PIA) Rüdersdorf
        • Contact:
      • Strausberg, Brandenburg, Germany, 15344
        • Recruiting
        • Psychiatrische Institutsambulanz (PIA) Strausberg
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Main diagnosis according to ICD 10 F00-F69, F80-F99
  • Capacity to consent is given
  • Sufficient language skills for an interview in German
  • Participants have access to modern digital hardware (smartphone)
  • Basic knowledge of how to operate a smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute danger to self or others
  • Patients have received prompt (<= 3 weeks) qualified psychiatric or psychotherapeutic treatment
  • Severe organic brain diseases with cognitive deficits
  • Intellectual disability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Exploratory preliminary study
General practitioners (n = 10), outpatient psychiatrists and psychologists (n = 10) and their patients (n = 20) will be involved. First, partly structured interviews will be conducted with the general practitioners and the psychiatric/psychological professionals as well as the patients they treat in order to record their perspectives on digital health services and the role of digital navigators. In parallel, focus groups will be organized with all three main groups to understand their opinions, concerns and expectations regarding the use of digital health applications and digital navigators. The data collection for the preliminary study extends over a period of 3 months (October - December 2024).
Experimental: Training
Staff members (n = 6) of participating study cites will be trained to become Digital Navigators. The recruitment and training of the digital navigators will take place over a period of 4 months (October 2024 to January 2025).
The training takes place in the six study centers and is preferably aimed at medical assistants.
Experimental: Treatment team and patient support
The Digital Navigators support the treatment teams in the study centers in the selection and integration of suitable apps and digital health applications (DiGAs). The selected patients (n = 48, 8 per center) are accompanied and supported by the trained navigators for 12 weeks to find a suitable app for them and integrate it into their treatment. A total period of 3 months is planned for both the recruitment of patients and the implementation off the intervention (December 2024 to February 2025).
The trained professionals (the Digital Navigators) support the treatment teams in the study centers in the selection and integration of suitable apps and digital health applications (DiGAs).
The trained professionals (the Digital Navigators) accompany and support the selected patients to find a suitable app for them and integrate it into their treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Digital health literacy (focus: digital information retrieval skills)
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the self-report rating inventory eHealth Literacy Scale (eHeals). Total score ranges from 8 to 40, with higher scores representing higher self-perceived eHealth literacy.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Digital health literacy (focus: digital interactive skills)
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using a performance-based rating inventory Digital Health Literacy Index (DHLI). Total score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher scores representing a greater ability to operate digital devices and read and write in web-based modes.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Acceptance towards Digital Navigators
Time Frame: Before the intervention (T0)
Qualitative questions using semi-structured interviews
Before the intervention (T0)
Expectations towards Digital Navigators
Time Frame: Before the intervention (T0)
Qualitative questions using focus groups
Before the intervention (T0)
Expectations towards Digital Navigators
Time Frame: Before the intervention (T0)
Qualitative questions using semi-structured interviews
Before the intervention (T0)
Acceptance towards Digital Navigators
Time Frame: Before the intervention (T0)
Qualitative questions using focus groups
Before the intervention (T0)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Willingness and competence to change
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the self-report rating inventory "Readiness for Change". Total score ranges from 0 to 172, with higher scores representing higher self-perceived willingness and competence to change.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Digital competence
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the self-report rating inventory ICT Self-Concept Scale. Total score ranges from 25 to 150, with higher scores representing higher self-perceived digital competence.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Technical competence
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the self-report rating inventory "Kurzskala Technikbereitschaft" (TB, technology commitment). Total score ranges from 12 to 60, with higher scores representing higher self-perceived technical competence.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Psychological Health of Patients (level of functioning)
Time Frame: After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the self-report rating inventory Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Total score ranging from 0-100, with a higher score indicating a higher level of functioning.
After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Psychological Health of Patients (symptom severity, treatment response and the efficacy of treatment)
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the self-report rating inventory Clinical Global Impression (CGI); Measuring three dimensions: severity of illness (score 1-7, with a higher score indicating a more severe illness), global improvement (score 1-7, with a higher score indicating a worsening of symptoms) and efficacy (measured with 4×4 rating scale (ranging from 01 - 16) that assesses the therapeutic effect of treatment and associated side effects; e.g. 01 = no side effects; vast improvement; 16 = severe side effects; unchanged or worse condition)
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Psychological Health of Patients (depressive symptoms; self-report)
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the self-report rating inventory Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI); Total score 0-63, with higher scores representing more severe depressive symptoms.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Psychological Health of Patients (depressive symptoms; clinician-administered)
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the clinician-administered rating inventory Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD); Total score 0-52, with higher scores representing more severe depressive symptoms.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Psychological Health of Patients (anxiety)
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the clinician-administered rating inventory Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA); Total score 0-56, with higher scores representing more severe anxiety symptoms.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Psychological Health of Patients (insomnia)
Time Frame: Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Using the self-report rating inventory Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); Total score 0-28, with higher scores representing more severe insomia symptoms.
Before (T0) and after completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Identification of implementation barriers to the introduction of digital navigators
Time Frame: After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Qualitative questions using semi-structured interviews
After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Identification of implementation barriers to the introduction of digital navigators
Time Frame: After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Qualitative questions using focus groups
After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Use of Digital Health Applications and the effects of counseling and support by Digital Navigators
Time Frame: After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Qualitative questions using semi-structured interviews
After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Use of Digital Health Applications and the effects of counseling and support by Digital Navigators
Time Frame: After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)
Qualitative questions using focus groups
After completion of the 12-week intervention (T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Martin Heinze, Prof, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 14, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00034327

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We have decided not to make the individual participant data (IPD) publicly available in order to ensure the highest level of data protection and confidentiality. Although all data will be properly anonymized, we want to ensure that no conclusions can be drawn about individual participants, not even indirectly. The protection of study participants' personal data is a top priority for us. Therefore, for ethical and data protection reasons, it is more responsible not to make the IPD publicly accessible.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Engagement, Patient

Clinical Trials on Training for Digital Navigators

Subscribe