Medical Mistrust Among Hispanic/Latino Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men (HLMSM)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Identifying and Addressing Historical and Structural Drivers of Medical Mistrust Among Hispanic/Latino Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men

There is an urgent need to address HIV inequities and disparities in the US, particularly within vulnerable communities such as Hispanic/Latino gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (HLMSM).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Medical mistrust is associated with HIV disparities among HLMSM because mistrust may result in delayed or reduced use of needed HIV prevention (e.g., HIV testing and Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake) and care (e.g., AntiretroViral Therapy [ART]) services.

While advances have been made to increase the use of HIV prevention and care services, profound disparities persist, and a need remains for increased understanding of the multilevel drivers of medical mistrust and for effective interventions to address these drivers among HLMSM in the US.

This research proposes a mixed-method study that includes rigorous qualitative and quantitative methods to better understand the drivers of medical mistrust among Spanish-speaking, English-speaking, and bilingual (including Spanish and English, or an indigenous language and Spanish and/or English) HLMSM. This study also proposes to refine and test a multilevel intervention designed to address medical mistrust and increase the use of needed HIV prevention and care services among diverse HLMSM in Mecklenburg County, NC, a jurisdiction prioritized by the Ending the HIV Epidemic in the US (EHE) initiative.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • reside in Mecklenburg County, NC
  • identify as Hispanic/Latino
  • be ≥18 years of age
  • speak English and Spanish
  • report identifying as male and having had sex with at least 1 man in the past 6 months
  • provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • less than 18 years of age
  • female

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Navigators (peer navigator) training
Training is designed to increase knowledge and skills. Navigators in the intervention group will be trained and supported for 12 months of implementation across years 3 and 4
The Navigators training will be designed to increase knowledge and skills to help others (i.e., social network members). Navigators in the intervention group will be trained and supported for 12 months of implementation across years 3 and 4
Experimental: delayed-intervention group
Training is designed to increase knowledge and skills. The delayed-intervention group will be trained in year 5
Those in the delayed-intervention group will be trained in year 5

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Rate of medical mistrust
Time Frame: baseline to post-intervention up to 18 months
The Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale (GBMMS) - The response key was a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and the score range was 12 to 60 - higher scores indicate greater levels of medical mistrust
baseline to post-intervention up to 18 months
Change in Rate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) testing
Time Frame: baseline to post-intervention up to 18 months
Change in Rate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) testing - Self-Report - did participant use testing in past 12 months
baseline to post-intervention up to 18 months
Change in Rate of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake
Time Frame: baseline to post-intervention up to 18 months
Change in Rate of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake - did participant use PrEP in past 12 months
baseline to post-intervention up to 18 months
Change in the amount of use of HIV care services
Time Frame: baseline to post-intervention up to 18 months
Change in the amount of use of HIV care services - did participant use HIV care in past 12 months
baseline to post-intervention up to 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott D Rhodes, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Sharing data generated from this study is an essential part of our proposed activities. This study will generate both quantitative and qualitative data

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Last 6 months of Year 5

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data and associated documentation (including codebooks) will be available from the Principal Investigators under a data-sharing agreement with users that provides for a commitment to:

(1) using the data for research purposes; (2) securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Clinical Trials on Navigators (peer navigator) training

Subscribe