- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06578078
A Clinical Trial to Define the Best Strategy for the Management of Heart Failure in Elderly Patients (SENEKA)
March 2, 2026 updated by: Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Define the Best Strategy for the Management of Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease Among Elderly Patients With or at High Risk of hyperKalemia in Span by Optimizing the Use of RAASi With SZC
Heart failure (HF) and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients are frequently not administered renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapies at recommended doses due to hyperkalaemia, despite proven mortality and morbidity benefits.
Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a nonabsorbed potassium binder proven to lower serum potassium (S-K) and maintain normokalaemia.
The purpose is to assess if a treatment regimen containing SZC will allow RAASi therapies to be optimized to target doses in patients with heart failure, chronic kidney disease and elevated serum potassium or at risk of developing elevated serum potassium.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a randomized clinical trial, multicentre, parallel group, open label, to evaluate the use of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) to optimize RAASi therapy in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease, through up-titration of ACEi, ARB, ARNI or MRA therapy according to clinical guidelines (1), without inducing clinically significant hyperkalemia.
Eligible subjects will have been admitted to hospital because of an HF (NYHA I- III) decompensation, will have required intravenous diuretics and will have had mild hyperkalaemic values that needed stabilization or be at risk of developing hyperkalaemia.
Subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive SZC or none (standard of care treatment without potassium binders) for 3 months while optimizing RAASi therapies according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
94
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Clara Bonanad Lozano
- Phone Number: +34 963156181
- Email: clarabonanad@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Albacete, Spain, 02006
- Recruiting
- Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora del Perpétuo Socorro
-
Contact:
- Alicia Noguerón García
- Email: Alicia_10nogueron@hotmail.com
-
Burgos, Spain, 09006
- Recruiting
- Hospital Universitario de Burgos
-
Contact:
- Maria Jesus Izquierdo Ortiz
- Email: mjizquierdo3@hotmail.com
-
Córdoba, Spain, 14004
- Not yet recruiting
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
-
Contact:
- Juan Carlos Castillo Dominguez
- Email: juanc.castillo.dominguez.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es
-
Valencia, Spain, 46010
- Recruiting
- Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
-
Contact:
- Clara Bonanad Lozano
- Phone Number: 963156181
- Email: clarabonanad@gmail.com
-
-
Madrid
-
Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, 28922
- Not yet recruiting
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón
-
Contact:
- Carolina Ortiz Cortés
- Email: carol.ortizcortes@gmail.com
-
Leganés, Madrid, Spain, 28914
- Not yet recruiting
- Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
-
Contact:
- Esther Alvarez Rodríguez
- Email: ealvarezr10@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
- Provision of informed consent form prior to any study specific procedures, sampling and analysis.
- Individuals must be ≥ 70 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form.
- Individuals must have a confirmed diagnosis of Heart Failure (HF) according to clinical practice guidelines NYHA functional class I-III (with HFrEF or HFpEF).
- Individuals must have previously been admitted to hospital due to HF decompensation requiring intravenous diuretics.
- Individuals must have been stabilised for at least 24-48h of their HF decompensation before randomisation.
- Individuals must have a confirmed diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease defined as a renal impairment of eGFR less than 60ml/min/1.73 m2.
- Individuals receiving background standard of care for HF and treated according to international guidelines. Specific treatment should include RAASi and/or MRA treatment and at least should have been stable for ≥ 4 weeks at maximum tolerated doses.
- Patients on RAASi blocker treatment with less than or equal to 75% of the maximum recommended dose.
- Hyperkalemic patients (sK+ 5.1-5.9 mmol/L at screening / study enrolment) or Normokalemic patients at risk of developing HK defining as having a history of hyperkalaemia (sK+ >5.0 mEq/L) within the prior 24 months and sK+ ≥4.5 mEq/L ≤ 5.1 mEq/L at inclusion
Exclusion Criteria:
- Limited life expectancy (less than 1 year) according to clinician's criteria, such as but not limited to malignancy, with life expectancy of less than 2 years based on investigator's clinical judgement.
- sK >6 mEq/litre or <4.5mEq/litre or history of hypokalemic episodes (S-K<3.5 mEq/L) during the last year.
- Patients on haemodialysis or haemofiltration
- NYHA functional class IV
- Patients undergoing treatment with potassium binders.
- Active tumour undergoing chemotherapy or metastasis or malignancy requiring treatment.
- Symptomatic or uncontrolled atrial fibrillation despite treatment, or asymptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia. Subjects with atrial fibrillation controlled by medication are permitted.
- QTc(f) > 550 msec.
- History of QT prolongation associated with other medications that required discontinuation of that medication.
- Congenital long QT syndrome.
- Prior history of hypersensitivity to a RAAS blocker drug, including but not limited to development of angioedema, icterus, hepatitis, or neutropenia or thrombocytopenia requiring treatment modification. Addison's disease or other causes of hypoaldosteronism.
- Patients with a known hypersensitivity to SZC or any of the excipients of the product.
- Individuals treated with potassium binding resins such as sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS, e.g. Kayexalate®) or calcium polystyrene sulfonate (CPS; e.g. Resonium®) or the cation exchange polymer, patiromer sorbitex calcium (Veltassa®) within 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.
- Treated with potassium supplements within 7 days prior to randomization. 15. Positive hepatitis C antibody hepatitis B virus surface antigen or hepatitis B virus core antibody, at screening.
- Known to have tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus.
- Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 3 year of screening.
- Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to both Investigator staff and/or staff at the study site).
- Judgment by the investigator that the subject should not participate in the study if the subject is unlikely to comply with study procedures, restrictions and requirements.
- Previous enrolment in the present study.
- Participation in another clinical study with an investigational product during the last 3 months.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SZC group
Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate with standard of care treatment (RAASi therapy)
|
Use of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate to optimize RAASi therapy, through up-titration of ACEi, ARB, ARNI or MRA therapy according to clinical guidelines
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Standard of care treatment (RAASi therapy) without Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
|
Standard of care treatment (RAASi therapy) without use of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of patients increasing at least 25% of the target doses of RAASi since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To compare the number of patients achieving an increase of at least 25% of RAASi according to guideline-recommended target doses, in the arm treated with Lokelma plus RAASi versus the arm treated with RAASi without K+ binder, at 3 months after study inclusion.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of patients achieving at least 50% of the target doses of RAASi since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To assess the number of patients achieving at least 50% of the target dose of RAASi recommended in the guidelines.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients increasing 50% of RAASi doses since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To assess the number of patients achieving at least 50% of the target dose of RAASi recommended in the guidelines.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of patients achieving at least 50% of the target doses of MRA since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To assess the number of patients that achieve at least 50% of the target dose recommended in guidelines of Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA).
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients increasing 50% of MRA doses since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To assess the number of patients that achieve at least 50% of the target dose recommended in guidelines of Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients achieving at least 50% of the target doses of MRA and RAASi since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To analyse the number of patients achieving at least 50% of the recommended target dose of MRA and achieving at least 50% of the guidelines recommended target dose of RAASi
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients increasing 50% of MRA and RAASi doses since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To analyse the number of patients achieving at least 50% of the recommended target dose of MRA and achieving at least 50% of the guidelines recommended target dose of RAASi
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients achieving the target doses of RAASi since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate the number of patients achieving the target dose recommended in guidelines of RAASi.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients in each group requiring a down titration of RAASi and/or MRA over the study period
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate the number of patients requiring down titration and discontinuation of RAASi and/or MRA during the study
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients in each group requiring up titration of RAASi and/or MRA following down titration of RAASi and/or MRA
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate the number of patients requiring down titration and discontinuation of RAASi and/or MRA during the study
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients in each group requiring discontinuation of RAASi and/or MRA over the study period.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate the number of patients requiring down titration and discontinuation of RAASi and/or MRA during the study
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients achieving at least 50% of the target doses of RAASi since the screening visit (V0) to 1 month after study inclusion
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To analyse the number of patients achieving 50% of target doses recommended in guidelines of RAASi at 1 month after study inclusion
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients increasing 50% of RAASi doses since the screening visit (V0) to 1 month after study inclusion
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To analyse the number of patients achieving 50% of target doses recommended in guidelines of RAASi at 1 month after study inclusion
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients achieving a decrease of at least 5% in NT-proBNP levels since the baseline visit (V1) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9).
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To determine surrogate short-term (90 days) efficacy objective of changes in biomarker levels (NT-proBNP and CA125) evaluated as a decrease of at least 5% from baseline to 3 months after study inclusion.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Mean Change in NT-proBNP levels since the baseline visit (V1) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9).
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To determine surrogate short-term (90 days) efficacy objective of changes in biomarker levels (NT-proBNP and CA125) evaluated as a decrease of at least 5% from baseline to 3 months after study inclusion.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients achieving a decrease of at least 5% in CA125 levels since the baseline visit (V1) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9).
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To determine surrogate short-term (90 days) efficacy objective of changes in biomarker levels (NT-proBNP and CA125) evaluated as a decrease of at least 5% from baseline to 3 months after study inclusion.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Mean Change in CA125 levels since the baseline visit (V1) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9).
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To determine surrogate short-term (90 days) efficacy objective of changes in biomarker levels (NT-proBNP and CA125) evaluated as a decrease of at least 5% from baseline to 3 months after study inclusion.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Mean change on Systolic arterial blood pressure measurement from baseline visit (V1) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9).
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To explore changes in systolic arterial blood pressure at baseline and 3 months after study inclusion.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Mean change from baseline visit (V1) measured at 3 months after study inclusion (V9) in the overall summary score of KKCQ, as a specific HF patient reported outcome questionnaire.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To explore the effect of treatment with SZC versus none on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
To determine the change in renal function the Mean Change in UACR and Mean change in HCO3 will be calculated between baseline visit (V1) and 3 months after study inclusion (V9)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate changes in renal function at baseline and 3 months after study inclusion between both groups
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of patients decreasing at least 40% the eGFR since the screening visit (V0) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9).
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To analyse the number of patients that decrease at least 40% in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the CDK-EPI formula.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Mean change from baseline visit (V1) measured at 3 months after study inclusion (V9) in the overall summary score of KDQoL, as a specific CKD patient reported outcome questionnaire.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To explore the effect of treatment with SZC versus none on the Kidney Disease Questionnaire of life (KDQoL) Overall Summary Score.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Number of visits for HF/HK/impaired renal function/hypertension or hyperkalemia diagnosed in the outpatient clinic.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To determine the number of visits to the emergency department for HF/HK/impaired renal function/hypertension (defined as BP over 200 and/or 100 mmHg) and hyperkalemia diagnosed in the outpatient clinic.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients requiring hospitalization for HF/HK/impaired renal function over the study period.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To analyse the number of admissions for HF/HK/impaired renal function.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Mean number of hospitalizations per patient for HF/HK/impaired renal function over the study period.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To analyse the number of admissions for HF/HK/impaired renal function.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients presenting at least one clinical event over the study period
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate in both experimental groups the combined endpoint of visits to the emergency department or admission for HF/HK/impaired renal function or decrease of at least 40% in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the CDK-EPI formula or death from cardiovascular causes.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients presenting more than one clinical event over the study period
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate in both experimental groups the combined endpoint of visits to the emergency department or admission for HF/HK/impaired renal function or decrease of at least 40% in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the CDK-EPI formula or death from cardiovascular causes.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients presenting all clinical events over the study period
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate in both experimental groups the combined endpoint of visits to the emergency department or admission for HF/HK/impaired renal function or decrease of at least 40% in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the CDK-EPI formula or death from cardiovascular causes.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Percentage of patients treated with and without sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors over the study period in both arms
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To analyse the percentage of patients with HF treated with and without sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Mean Change in Mg levels since the baseline visit (V1) to 3 months after study inclusion (V9).
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To explore changes in Mg levels at baseline and 3 months after study inclusion.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
|
Proportion of patients presenting each clinical outcome over the study period: Adverse events, Serious adverse events, Changes in clinical laboratory parameters, Changes in vital signs and ECGs
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of SZC in this patient population.
|
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 3, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 27, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
August 29, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 4, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 2, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Kidney Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Heart Diseases
- Chronic Disease
- Disease Attributes
- Renal Insufficiency
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Heart Failure
- Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
- sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
Other Study ID Numbers
- SENEKA
- 2024-513971-42-00 (Ctis)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate
-
AstraZenecaCompletedHyperkalemiaKorea, Republic of, Taiwan, Russian Federation, Japan
-
AstraZenecaCompletedA Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of ZS in Patients With Hyperkalemia. (HARMONIZE Asia)HyperkalemiaChina, India
-
Barts & The London NHS TrustTerminatedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | CKD | HyperkalemiaUnited Kingdom
-
AstraZenecaCompletedChronic Kidney Disease | HyperkalaemiaItaly, Spain, Belgium, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands
-
AstraZenecaCompleted
-
Qianfoshan HospitalNot yet recruitingThe Cardioprotective Effects of Improving Potassium Variability in Maintenance Hemodialysis PatientsMyocardial Injury | Hypokalemia | Hyperkalemia | Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis
-
Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico...Recruiting
-
ZS Pharma, Inc.CompletedHyperkalemiaUnited States, South Africa, Australia
-
AstraZenecaCompleted