Move and Snooze: Adding Insomnia Treatment to an Exercise Program to Improve Pain Outcomes in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis

April 10, 2026 updated by: Daniel Whibley, University of Michigan

This research will compare the effectiveness of a remotely delivered personalized exercise coaching plus an evidence-based sleep improvement intervention to remotely delivered personalized exercise coaching alone for knee osteoarthritis pain.

The study team hypothesize that the combined intervention will result in greater improvements in patient-reported pain intensity, recorded with real-time data capture, than remotely delivered exercise coaching alone.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

288

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Whibley, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported physician diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis
  • Persistent knee osteoarthritis-related pain of at least moderate intensity (as indicated in the protocol)
  • Indication of persistent symptoms of insomnia, determined by scoring on the Sleep Condition Indicator questionnaire (as indicated in the protocol)
  • If receiving medication for pain or sleep disturbances, having had no change in prescription in the previous three months and be willing to make no other changes to medications for pain or sleep during the active study period.
  • Adequate literacy level to ensure web-based surveys can be completed independently, as assessed using a brief 3-item literacy level screener

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent diagnosis of a systemic, inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Active malignancy
  • Neurological conditions (e.g., movement disorders)
  • Any medical condition which would make graded increase of physical activity unsuitable (determined by a positive answer to the question: "Has a doctor or healthcare professional advised you to avoid physical activity for any reason?").
  • Unable to understand English sufficiently to take part in the intervention.
  • Unable to provide electronic informed consent.
  • Evidence of significant cognitive impairment (i.e., ≥2 errors on a 6-item cognitive screener).
  • Presence of severe psychiatric disorder.
  • Currently participating in an interventional trial or a pain or sleep management program or having done so in the past six months.
  • Visual or hearing impairment that would prevent use of the intervention.
  • Serious physical health concerns necessitating surgery or with a prognosis <6 months
  • Irregular sleep-wake schedule, e.g., shift work.
  • Self-report of diagnosis of a specific sleep disorder other than insomnia that is not currently adequately treated, e.g., sleep apnea or narcolepsy.
  • Currently meeting or exceeding physical activity guidance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (noted in protocol)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Move and Snooze program
This includes the personalized exercise program plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I).

This is a 6-session personalized exercise coaching program (delivered over 8 weeks).

All participants will complete six 30-minute scheduled online or phone sessions with a health coach as part of a manualized personalized exercise program (once per week for the first four sessions and then once every two weeks for the remaining two sessions).

This is a 6-week course of automated, digitally delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia delivered by the online program Sleepio. The weekly sessions will last approximately 15-20 minutes.

Session content comprises evidence-based cognitive and behavioral techniques including Stimulus Control Therapy and Sleep Restriction Therapy, sleep hygiene education, and relaxation exercises.

Experimental: Personalized exercise program

This is a 6-session personalized exercise coaching program (delivered over 8 weeks).

All participants will complete six 30-minute scheduled online or phone sessions with a health coach as part of a manualized personalized exercise program (once per week for the first four sessions and then once every two weeks for the remaining two sessions).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in average pain intensity using a 0-10 numerical rating scale between baseline and the 8-week follow-up (post-intervention) period
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-week follow-up (post-intervention)
This is a one question numerical rating scale in which participants select from 0 (no pain) -10 (worst pain imaginable) numerical rating scale 4 times a day over 7 days during each assessment period (baseline and 8-week follow-up). These four within-day ratings collected over seven days will be averaged for each participant to provide a single pain intensity rating for each assessment period.
Baseline, 8-week follow-up (post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a questionnaire between baseline and 8-week follow-up (post-intervention)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-week (post-intervention)
There are 3 questions that participants answer and from no pain (1) - very severe (5). There is a total score of 15 with a higher score indicating higher pain intensity.
Baseline, 8-week (post-intervention)
Change in the PROMIS Pain Interference 8a questionnaire between baseline and 8-week follow-up (post-intervention)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-week (post-intervention)
There are 8 questions regarding the extent to which pain has interfered with activities over the past 7 days, ranging from not at all (1) - Very much (5). Total scores range from 8 to 40, with a higher score representing higher interference due to pain.
Baseline, 8-week (post-intervention)
Change in the PROMIS Physical Function questionnaire between baseline and 8-week follow-up (post-intervention)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-week (post-intervention)
There are 4 questions regarding function that participants answer and from without any difficulty (5) - unable to do (1). And 4 questions for that participants select from not at all (5) to cannot do (1). There is a total score of 40 with a higher score indicating greater physical function.
Baseline, 8-week (post-intervention)
Change in the Quality of Life subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) between baseline and 8-week follow-up (post-intervention)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-week (post-intervention)
The KOOS quality of life subscale includes 4 questions. The Score subscale is scored using a Likert scale with five possible answers, ranging from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). The quality of life subscale score is then normalized to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores equaling better status. 0 represents extreme knee problems and 100 represents no knee problems.
Baseline, 8-week (post-intervention)
Patient Global Impression of Change at 8-week follow-up (post-intervention)
Time Frame: 8-week (post-intervention)
This is a one question survey that participants will select from very much improved (1) -very much worse (7) since the start of the study and overall status. A lower number indicates better outcome.
8-week (post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Whibley, PhD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 29, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After the study is completed, the de-identified, archived data will be transmitted to and stored at the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research data repository.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Final submission and release of the study data will occur approximately 8 and 12 months following the end of fieldwork, respectively, and within the award period. Study data deposited in the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research data repository will be available to the research community in perpetuity.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Public use and restricted access study data and associated documentation will be made available to the research community free of charge through the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research data repository.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Personalized exercise coaching

Subscribe