- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06581458
Home Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome (HometDCS)
- To examine the effect of a two-week tDCS intervention of 3 months of continued tDCS intervention versus 3 months of receiving a placebo treatment (dummy). On the costs of performing an action task (dual task cost) walking speed, cognitive measures and motor function.
- To examine whether the effects of tDCS build up over time by creating a delayed start mechanism in the intervention (delayed-start design)
- Examining mechanical and neuroplastic effects of tDCS intervention
- To examine the response to tDCS over time
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- The study aims to investigate the mechanical and neuroplastic effects of a tDCS intervention.
- The intervention consists of an initial two-week period of tDCS application, followed by three months of continued tDCS treatment.
- A placebo group will receive a dummy treatment for three months to compare the outcomes.
- The study will measure various parameters including the costs of performing an action task (dual task cost), walking speed, cognitive measures, and motor function.
- A delayed-start design will be used to determine if the effects of tDCS build up over time.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 65-90
Cognitive complaints
- A positive answer to the question "Do you feel you have more problems than most people?"
- A negative answer to the question "Is your thinking as clear and sharp as it was before?"
- Slow walking - one standard deviation below the average for age and gender (under age 75: men less than 101.9 cm/s, women less than 97.4 cm/s. Over or equal to age 75: men less than 85.3 s) m/s women less than 76.7 cm/s)
No significant disability
- There is the ability to walk without support on a walking carpet
- A result below 9 in the Functional Activities Questionnaire index
- Identification as qualified
Identification as willing and able to operate a tDCS device or have a partner who is able to operate the device during home use. According to the criteria:
- Inclusion: selected by the patient, over the age of 21, with basic computer skills and available throughout the study period
- Exclusion: MOCA score lower than or equal to 26. Presents insufficient understanding, poor vision, severe joint problems in the hands, deformity pain or other conditions that may interfere with the successful operation of the tDCS
- Has access to a reliable wireless internet network (WiFi) at the patient's home
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than eight years of study
dementia
- According to the clinical definition clinical dementia rationing (CDR) score 1 or higher
- Previous diagnosis
- Performance in the range indicating dementia in the neuropsychological test bettery (lower than 2 standard deviations below the age- and sex-matched average)
- IQ is low or equal to 85 in the WTAR test. without a background of mental disability
- Current diagnosis of major psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar, major depression)
- Evidence of moderate to severe symptoms of depression. A score high or equal to 9 on the 15 item geriatric depression scale
- History of head injury that led to prolonged loss of consciousness
- History of palpitations of unknown origin that may indicate convulsions
- History of convulsions, diagnosis of epilepsy in the patient or in most of the first degree family. Except for a case of a single seizure of benign etiology determined by a neurologist
- Hospitalization during the last three months following an acute illness or musculoskeletal injury with a significant impact on walking or stability
- An unbalanced medical condition that can worsen following convulsive stimulation (cardiac malformation, cardiac arrhythmias, asthma, etc.)
- Substance use disorders during the last six months
- A wig or hair design that prevents contact of the electrodes with the scalp or interferes with the administration of the stimulation
- Chronic vertigo
- A cardiac event within the last six months
- Active cancer treated with chemotherapy or radiation
- blindness
- Visual hallucinations (according to history or self-report)
There are contraindications for MRI or tDCS as defined by the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology
- Includes unprovoked convulsions during the last 2 years
- Danger of finding ferromagnetic objects in the body, self-reporting of medical implants in the body (DBS, deep brain stimulation, drug delivery pump, cochlear implant, pacemaker)
- Inventions active dermatological condition
- History of behavior disorders in REM sleep, sometimes an early sign of Parkinson's disease
- Medications and medical history will be examined by a clinician and a decision regarding entry into the study will be based on medical history, current medication dosage and medication change before or during the treatment as well as combination with other active CNS medications.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: tDCS immediate intervention group
Participants in the tDCS Immediate Intervention Group will receive an initial two-week period of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) treatment.
This will be followed by three months of continued tDCS intervention.
|
The immediate intervention group will continue to receive five tDCS treatments per week for 6 months.
The late intervention group will receive five sham treatments per week for 3 months and then begin receiving five weekly tDCS treatments for an additional 3 months.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Late intervention group (tDCS+ sham)
Participants in the Late Intervention Group will first receive a placebo (sham) treatment for three months.
This will be followed by a two-week period of active transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) treatment, then three months of continued tDCS intervention.
|
The immediate intervention group will continue to receive five tDCS treatments per week for 6 months.
The late intervention group will receive five sham treatments per week for 3 months and then begin receiving five weekly tDCS treatments for an additional 3 months.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy in Serial Subtractions Task
Time Frame: 45-second
|
articipants will perform serial subtractions from a random 3-digit number between 200 and 999.
Accuracy will be measured as the percentage of correct subtractions.
|
45-second
|
|
Usual walk
Time Frame: 45-second
|
fNIRS with walking trial 20m indoor course with 180-degree turns at each end and an instrumented gait mat in the middle.
|
45-second
|
|
Walk with the cognitive task (DT)
Time Frame: 45-second
|
fNIRS with walking trial 20m indoor course with 180-degree turns at each end and an instrumented gait mat in the middle.
|
45-second
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mobility - SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery)
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Evaluating participants' physical performance through a battery of tests including balance, walking speed, and chair stand tests.
|
9 months
|
|
Mobility - 4 m Gait Test
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Measuring participants' gait speed over a 4-meter distance.
|
9 months
|
|
Mobility - Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Participants' fear of falling and confidence in performing daily activities without falling will be assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Scale: Scores range from 16 to 64, with higher scores indicating a greater fear of falling (worse outcome). |
9 months
|
|
Mobility - Habitual Physical Activity and Real-World Gait
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Monitoring participants' habitual physical activity and gait in real-world settings using an Axivity sensor taped to the lower back.
|
9 months
|
|
Mood- Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS
Time Frame: 9 months
|
A 15-item questionnaire used to assess depressive symptoms in older adults.
Scale: Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms (worse outcome).
|
9 months
|
|
Mood- SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey)
Time Frame: 9 months
|
A 36-item questionnaire used to assess overall health-related quality of life, including emotional well-being. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health and well-being (better outcome). |
9 months
|
|
anxiety- Geriatric Anxiety Inventory - Short Form (GAI-SF)
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Questionnaire: Geriatric Anxiety Inventory - Short Form (GAI-SF).
Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety (worse outcome).
|
9 months
|
|
apathy
Time Frame: 9 months
|
The Apathy Scale is used to assess the level of apathy in participants.
Scale: Scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater apathy (worse outcome).
|
9 months
|
|
Functional Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Functional Activity Questionnaire- Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater difficulty in performing daily activities (worse outcome).
|
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Motor Screening Task
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Assessment: The Motor Screening Task will evaluate participants' basic motor abilities using a computerized test.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better motor function.
|
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Reaction Time
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Reaction Time will be measured to assess the speed of cognitive processing using a computerized test. Scale: Reaction time is measured in milliseconds, with lower times indicating faster cognitive processing (better outcome). |
9 months
|
|
cognitive Function
Time Frame: 9 months
|
battery to minimize procedural learning.
ll tests have excellent psychometric properties and normative data suitable for our sample.
validated battery of computerized tests (CANTAB Connect Research).Specific tests include the Motor Screening Task, Reaction Time, Paired Associates Learning, Spatial Working Memory, Pattern Recognition Memory, Delayed Matching to Sample, and Rapid Visual Information Processing.
Additionally, participants will complete the MoCA, RAVLT, and Category and Phonemic Fluency tests.
|
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Paired Associates Learning
Time Frame: 9 months
|
The Paired Associates Learning test will evaluate memory function by assessing participants' ability to recall associations between objects and locations. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better memory function. |
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Spatial Working Memory
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Spatial Working Memory will be assessed using a computerized test to evaluate participants' ability to retain and manipulate spatial information. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better working memory. |
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Pattern Recognition Memory
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Pattern Recognition Memory will be tested to measure participants' visual memory and pattern recognition abilities. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better pattern recognition. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better working memory. |
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Delayed Matching to Sample
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Delayed Matching to Sample will be used to evaluate visual memory and matching abilities after a delay. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better matching abilities. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better working memory. |
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Rapid Visual Information Processing
Time Frame: 9 months
|
The Rapid Visual Information Processing task will assess sustained attention and visual processing speed. Scale: Accuracy is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better sustained attention. Reaction time is measured in milliseconds, with lower times indicating faster processing. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better working memory. |
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: 9 months
|
The MoCA will be used to evaluate global cognitive function across multiple domains. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. |
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Time Frame: 9 months
|
The RAVLT will assess verbal memory through recall and recognition tasks.
Scale: Scores range from 0 to 15 for immediate recall, with higher scores indicating better memory performance.
Scale: Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
|
9 months
|
|
Cognitive Function - Category and Phonemic Fluency Tests
Time Frame: 9 months
|
These tests will evaluate participants' semantic knowledge and word retrieval abilities. Scale: Scores represent the number of correct words generated within a time limit, with higher scores indicating better fluency. Scale: Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. |
9 months
|
|
Height
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Height will be measured in meters.
|
9 months
|
|
Weight
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Weight will be measured in kilograms.
|
9 months
|
|
Medical History
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Medical History
|
9 months
|
|
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Blood Pressure
|
9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0098-24-TLV
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterNot yet recruitingMotoric Cognitive Risk SyndromeUnited States
-
Balikesir UniversityRecruitingMotoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome | Cognitive-Motor Interaction | Sensorimotor PerformanceTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Balikesir UniversityRecruitingGait | Balance | Motoric Cognitive Risk SyndromeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Balikesir UniversityRecruitingGait | Balance | Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome | Dual-Task PerformanceTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingMotoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome | Physical ActivitiesChina
-
Tufts UniversityBoston Older Americans Independence Center; Somerville Council on Aging, MassachusettsCompleted
-
Jewish General HospitalActive, not recruitingFrailty | Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome | Cognitive-prefrailtyCanada
-
Jewish General HospitalActive, not recruitingMotoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome | Cognitive-prefrailty | PrefrailtyCanada
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingMotoric Cognitive Risk SyndromeUnited States
-
Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services...Active, not recruitingMotoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome | Aging DisorderCanada
Clinical Trials on tDCS
-
Hôpital le VinatierCompletedSchizophrenia | Auditory HallucinationsFrance, Tunisia
-
Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts General Hospital; National Institute on Aging (NIA)Unknown
-
Universidad de AlmeriaSecretaría General de Universidades, Investigación y Tecnología, Junta de...Enrolling by invitationSubstance-Related DisordersSpain
-
Thorsten RudroffTerminatedMultiple Sclerosis | Neuropathic PainUnited States
-
Nachum Soroker, MDUnknown
-
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteCompleted
-
University of MichiganNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedMotor Activity | Motor NeuroplasticityUnited States
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedMigraine With Aura | CADASIL | Cerebral Microangiopathy | ICA StenosisGermany
-
New York UniversityRecruiting