Differential Assessment of Hypertonia

October 9, 2024 updated by: Ya-Ju Chang, Chang Gung University

Differential Assessment of Hypertonia Related to CNS Impairment

Spasticity and rigidity are common symptoms of central nervous system injuries, such as spinal cord injury and Parkinson's disease, and result in distinct patterns of increased resistance during passive joint movements. Spasticity is characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in stretch reflexes, accompanied by exaggerated tendon responses, while rigidity is marked by consistent resistance throughout the range of motion, traditionally considered independent of stretch velocity. However, recent studies suggest that rigidity may also be influenced by stretch velocity. This study aims to investigate muscle tone by examining spasticity, rigidity, and normal muscle function through neural and biomechanical changes. Standard clinical tools, such as the Modified Ashworth Scale and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, along with additional assessments like the Myoton and Post-Activation Depression (PAD), will be employed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Spasticity and rigidity are common symptoms resulting from central nervous system injuries (e.g., spinal cord injury and Parkinson's disease). During passive joint movement, spasticity and rigidity manifest as two distinct patterns of increased resistance. Spasticity is a type of hypertonia characterized by a stretch reflex that increases with speed, accompanied by exaggerated tendon reflexes. Rigidity, on the other hand, is another form of hypertonia, where resistance increases during passive movement and remains consistent throughout the range of motion.

The degree of rigidity is traditionally considered independent of stretch velocity, which is one of the key differences from spasticity. However, recent studies have found that rigidity may also increase with stretch velocity. Despite attempts to distinguish different types of hypertonia based on stretch velocity, these efforts have largely been unsuccessful. Many factors influence muscle tone, which can be broadly categorized into changes in neural and biomechanical properties. The Modified Ashworth Scale and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale are the most commonly used clinical tools for assessing spasticity and rigidity. Additionally, devices such as the Myoton or laboratory parameters like Post-Activation Depression (PAD) are also used for assessment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
        • Recruiting
        • Chang Gung University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Health subjects:

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Musculoskeletal injuries on legs.
  2. Osteoporosis.

SCI subjects:

Inclusion Criteria 1. Participants with chronic spinal cord injury, with injury duration greater than one year.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Current musculoskeletal or joint injuries in the lower limbs.
  2. History of central or peripheral neuromuscular diseases.
  3. Presence of a pacemaker.
  4. Current use of antispastic or antidepressant medications.
  5. Current venous thromboembolism or osteoporosis.
  6. Impairment of the soleus H-reflex arc.

PD subjects:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Musculoskeletal injuries on legs
  2. Osteoporosis.
  3. Any peripheral or central nervous system injury or disease patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Healthy Participants
To establish the relationship between changes in foot pressure during ankle joint movement, muscle tone, and Post-Activation Depression (PAD).
Continuous passive motion device (CPM) of ankle at 1HZ(60rpm) for 10 repetitions
Other Names:
  • fast CPM
Continuous passive motion device (CPM) of ankle 0.25HZ (15rpm) for 10 repetitions
Other Names:
  • slow CPM
Experimental: PD Patients
To establish the relationship between changes in foot pressure during ankle joint movement, muscle tone, and Post-Activation Depression (PAD).
Continuous passive motion device (CPM) of ankle at 1HZ(60rpm) for 10 repetitions
Other Names:
  • fast CPM
Continuous passive motion device (CPM) of ankle 0.25HZ (15rpm) for 10 repetitions
Other Names:
  • slow CPM
Experimental: SCI Patients
To establish the relationship between changes in foot pressure during ankle joint movement, muscle tone, and Post-Activation Depression (PAD).
Continuous passive motion device (CPM) of ankle at 1HZ(60rpm) for 10 repetitions
Other Names:
  • fast CPM
Continuous passive motion device (CPM) of ankle 0.25HZ (15rpm) for 10 repetitions
Other Names:
  • slow CPM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of Post-Activation Depression (PAD) of the H-reflex.
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
The H-reflex will be elicited by electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve (or other motor nerves), and PAD will be assessed by measuring the reduction in H-reflex amplitude following a series of repetitive stimuli. The amplitude of the H-reflex after repeated stimulation will be compared to the baseline single stimulus.
Before CPM, immediately after CPM
H/M ratio
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
The H/M ratio is calculated by dividing the amplitude of the H-reflex by the amplitude of the M-wave.
Before CPM, immediately after CPM
Muscle Tone (Frequency, Hz)
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
This parameter measures the natural oscillation frequency of the muscle in response. It reflects the muscle's state of tension or readiness
Before CPM, immediately after CPM
Elasticity (Dynamic Stiffness, N/m)
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
Elasticity, measured in Newtons per meter, reflects the muscle's ability to return to its original shape after being deformed by the impulse
Before CPM, immediately after CPM
Stiffness (Decay, ms)
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
This parameter quantifies the rate at which the muscle returns to its initial state after the impulse, indicating the muscle's stiffness.
Before CPM, immediately after CPM
Mechanical Stress (Creep, s) and Relaxation (S)
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
These parameters measure the time it takes for muscle tissue to adapt to a sustained force (creep) and the time it takes for the muscle to return to a relaxed state after removing the force (relaxation)
Before CPM, immediately after CPM
Plantar foot pressure distribution and peak pressure
Time Frame: Measured continuously during CPM
Foot pressure will be measured using a pressure sensors during ankle movement.
Measured continuously during CPM
H-reflex Amplitude
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
The peak-to-peak amplitude of the H-reflex measured in the soleus muscle to assess spinal motor neuron excitability. Unit: Millivolts (mV)
Before CPM, immediately after CPM
M-wave Amplitude
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
The peak-to-peak amplitude of the M-wave recorded in the soleus muscle to assess peripheral motor neuron excitability and muscle response. Unit: Millivolts (mV)
Before CPM, immediately after CPM

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
M-wave Latency
Time Frame: Before CPM, immediately after CPM
The time from the onset of electrical stimulation to the onset of the M-wave response in the soleus muscle, used to assess changes in peripheral nerve conduction velocity. Unit: Milliseconds (ms)
Before CPM, immediately after CPM

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) Score
Time Frame: Baseline
An aggregated score derived from the eight dimension scores, providing a comprehensive measure of the individual's quality of life.
Baseline
Overall the Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure(PRISM) Score
Time Frame: Baseline
: An aggregated score derived from all the individual items within the questionnaire, providing a comprehensive measure of the impact of spasticity on the patient's quality of life.
Baseline
Total The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score
Time Frame: Baseline
The sum of scores from all 14 items, providing an overall measure of motor impairment severity.
Baseline
Muscle spasticity levels as assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
Time Frame: Baseline
Muscle spasticity levels will be assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), which evaluates resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching. This measure will be used to evaluate changes in muscle tone before and immediately after the intervention. Unit: MAS score (ordinal scale from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no increase in muscle tone and 4 indicates rigidity in flexion or extension)
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SCI - Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Continuous passive motion device (CPM) of ankle - fast

Subscribe