Safety and Efficacy of a Drug Eluting Slim Modiolar Electrode Array (DEE-REX)

February 26, 2026 updated by: Cochlear

A Pivotal, Prospective, Multicentre, Single-arm Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Dexamethasone Eluting Slim Modiolar Electrode Array (EA32D).

This clinical study will test a new type of cochlear implant known as CI632D. This experimental cochlear implant has been designed to slowly release a drug called dexamethasone. Dexamethasone works to ease inflammation and reduce tissue injury, which is common after any type of surgery. The goal is to learn if the dexamethasone in the CI632D implant lessens these reactions inside the ear following surgery and if this makes the implant work as well, or even better, in improving hearing than what would be expected with a standard cochlear implant. The study will be conducted in adults with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or auditory nerve (the nerve that carries sound signals from the ear to the brain). The study participants will receive the CI632D experimental implant and will complete tests to see how well they are hearing and how well the implant is working.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Medical Center
    • Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
        • Rocky Mountain Ear Center
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Health
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
        • Washington University
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10010
        • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
      • New York, New York, United States, 10017
        • NYU Langone Health
      • New York, New York, United States, 11042
        • Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older, at time of consent.
  • Postlinguistic moderately severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, defined by a four frequency (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) pure-tone average unaided threshold (PTA4) ≥ 60 decibels hearing level (dB HL), in the ear to be implanted (For this study, moderately severe is defined by a four-frequency, pure-tone average threshold (PTA4) over the range 500 through 4000 Hz of more than 55 dB HL through 70 dB HL, inclusive. Profound is defined by a PTA4 of more than 90 dB HL).
  • Pure-tone average unaided threshold (500 through 4000 Hz) ≥ 30 dB HL, in the contralateral ear.
  • Preoperative aided word score ≤ 40% correct in the ear to be implanted.
  • Evidence of pneumococcal vaccination (e.g., Pneumovax) according to local guidelines.
  • Candidate is proficient in the language used to assess speech perception performance.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intra-axial (within the brain) lesions or deafness due to lesions of the acoustic nerve affecting the ear to be implanted.
  • Middle ear infection (including acute otitis media, chronic otitis media, suppurative otitis media, or serous drainage) in the ear to be implanted either at the time of surgery or within 3 months prior to enrolment.
  • Active autoimmune disease or active immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Presence of a tympanic membrane perforation or a history of otologic surgery within 3 months prior to enrolment, in the ear to be implanted.
  • Previously reported diagnosis of auditory neuropathy, in the ear to be implanted.
  • Previously reported diagnosis, in the ear to be implanted, of Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome (LVAS), Meniere's disease, or cochlear hydrops.
  • Ossification, otosclerosis, malformation or any other cochlear anomaly, such as common cavity, that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array, in the ear to be implanted.
  • Current cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts or drains, existing perilymph fistula, skull fracture or CSF leaks.
  • Previously reported diagnosis of bacterial meningitis.
  • Known allergic reaction or contraindication to dexamethasone or corticosteroids.
  • Severe, or poorer, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss prior to 5 years of age, as reported by the subject. (For this study, severe is defined by a PTA4 of more than 70 dB HL through 90 dB HL, inclusive).
  • Severe, or poorer, sensorineural hearing loss for more than 20 years, as reported by the subject, in the ear to be implanted.
  • Prior cochlear implantation in either ear.
  • Medical plan for cochlear implantation during the clinical investigation, contralateral to the ear to be implanted.
  • Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate general anaesthesia, surgery, or participation in the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
  • Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations inherent to the surgical procedure(s) and prosthetic devices, as determined by the Investigator.
  • Women who are pregnant.
  • Additional disabilities that may affect the subject's participation or safety during the clinical investigation.
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with all the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the investigator.
  • Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families. Immediate family is defined as spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
  • Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organisations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
  • Current participation, or participation in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, involving an investigational drug or device unless Cochlear sponsored and determined by Investigator or Sponsor to not impact this investigation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Drug-eluting electrode array (CI632D)
Participants will be implanted with the slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array.
CI632D cochlear implant
Other Names:
  • CI632D
  • Slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array
CI632D, dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implant
Other Names:
  • CI632D
  • Slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coprimary endpoint 1: Mean monopolar 1 plus 2 (MP1+2) impedances (kOhms) at 3 months postactivation
Time Frame: On day of implantation and at 1- and 3-months postactivation
Impedance will be measured across the active electrodes of the implant for each participant.
On day of implantation and at 1- and 3-months postactivation
Coprimary endpoint 2: Mean change in word recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in quiet from preimplantation to 3 months postactivation
Time Frame: Preoperative baseline and 3-months postactivation
Within-subject change in consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet (% correct) calculated as the average across 2 runs of the test conducted on each participant. CNC word score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
Preoperative baseline and 3-months postactivation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean within-subject change in the global score of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale (SSQ12) from preimplantation to postimplantation
Time Frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Within-subject change in Global SSQ12 scores at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. The global SSQ12 score ranges from 0-10, higher the score the better the outcome.
Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation
Time Frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Within-subject change in AzBio sentence in noise score at a +10 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. AzBio score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best bilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation
Time Frame: Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation
Within-subject change in AzBio sentence in noise score at a +10 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. AzBio score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants who experience an adverse event and the proportion of participants who experience a device deficiency throughout the study
Time Frame: From implantation to 12-months postimplantation (study end)
Adverse events will be recorded as overall, by severity, by relatedness to device or procedure, or by seriousness. Device deficiency will be recorded as overall and by type.
From implantation to 12-months postimplantation (study end)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Aaron Parkinson, PhD, Cochlear

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Cochlear implant

Subscribe