Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Molars Restored Using Giomer

September 16, 2024 updated by: Omar Shaalan, NewGiza University

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Molars Restored Using Giomer Compared to Resin Composite Restorations After 24 Months (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Dental manufacturers' constant tweaks and improvements to composite compositions have resulted in a wider spectrum of restorative materials with positive long-term clinical performance. For example, the creation of bioactive giomer material with proven continuous multi-ion release has been beneficial in avoiding demineralization and imparting acid resistance to enamel and dentin.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Giomer resin not only reduces the risk of secondary caries around restorations by releasing fluoride ions, but it also has good esthetic, physical, and handling features. Furthermore, advancements have been made to reduce giomer resin polymerization shrinkage by incorporating filler technology into the matrix system. As a result of these efforts, giomer resin is currently distinguished by its low shrinkage feature. According to the manufacturer, low shrinkage giomer resin has volumetric shrinkage of 0.8% and a polymerization shrinkage stress of 2.72 MPa. Several investigations were carried out to examine the overall clinical performance of low shrinkage giomer resin with equivalent success rates when compared to other restorative materials. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of giomer in maintaining pulp health and dentin bridge formation after partial caries removal in permanent teeth with deep occlusal carious lesion when compared to resin composite restoration.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Inclusion criteria of participants:

    • 18 -35 years.
    • Not received antibiotic therapy since 1 month before sampling.
    • Males or Females (Both genders).
    • Co-operative patients approving the trial.
    • Good to fair oral hygiene
  2. Inclusion criteria of teeth:

    • Class I cavitated lesions in permanent molars (reaching >1/2 of the dentin on radiographic examination)
    • Absence of spontaneous pain; negative sensitivity to percussion; and absence of periapical lesions (radiographic examination).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Exclusion criteria of participants:

    • known allergic reaction to resinous materials.
    • Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
    • Periodontal problem.
    • Bruxism
    • Poor oral hygiene
  2. Exclusion criteria of teeth:

    • Class II caries lesion
    • Shallow or enamel caries
    • Teeth with periapical lesions.
    • Mobile teeth, arrest caries and non-vital teeth

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Giomer
Low-shrinkage bioactive material
The most remarkable feature of this light-cured universal composite for anterior and posterior restorations is its unique shrinkage of 0.85 percent by volume
Active Comparator: Nanohybrid composite
Universal Nano-hybrid composite
Nanohybrid resin composites are the most popular, because they improve the distribution of fillers in the matrix by combining nanoparticles with submicron particles to achieve better mechanical, chemical, and optical properties

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
The primary outcome of the present clinical trial is success rate, expressed as a binary variable indicating whether the restored tooth maintained its pulp vitality after 24 months. Success will be evaluated by a positive response to cold pulp testing, absence of spontaneous pain, no tenderness to percussion, absence of periapical radiolucency.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dentin bridge formation
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Dentin bridge formation will be evaluated by digital radiographs taken with standardized exposure parameters according to standardized procedure by placement of film holders in paralleling technique. Dentin bridge formation will be measured by millimeters (mm)
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • giomervscomp

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

confidentiality, risk of data misinterpretation

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Caries, Dental

Clinical Trials on Beautifil II LS (Low-Shrinkage)

Subscribe