Evaluation of Analgesia for Spine Fusion Elective Surgery in Children (PRECISE)

April 29, 2026 updated by: Senthil Sadhasivam

Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Analgesia for Spine Fusion Elective Surgery in Children (PRECISE Spine Trial)

The multicenter PRECISE Analgesia (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Analgesia for Idiopathic Scoliosis Spine Fusion Elective Surgery in Children) trials will a) implement and investigate the efficacy and safety of multidose methadone-based standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, and b) develop personalized ERAS protocols including precision methadone and oxycodone dosing and c) personalized analgesia for the safe and effective opioid-sparing management of surgical pain after posterior spine fusion (PSF) in children.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

SPECIFIC AIMS. The multicenter PRECISE Analgesia (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Analgesia for Idiopathic Scoliosis Spine Fusion Elective Surgery in Children) trials will a) implement and investigate the efficacy and safety of multidose methadone-based standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, and b) develop personalized ERAS protocols including precision methadone and oxycodone dosing, and c) personalized analgesia for the safe and effective opioid-sparing management of surgical pain after posterior spine fusion (PSF) in children.

The long-term goal is to proactively improve the safety and efficacy of surgical pain control while reducing opioid AEs and the opioid epidemic burden in all children undergoing inpatient surgeries. The central hypothesis is that a standardized, multidose, methadone-based ERAS protocol will reduce acute surgical pain, overall opioid use, RD, PONV, and CPSP compared with standard-of-care short-acting opioid-based analgesia in children undergoing PSF (Aim 1). Investigators will use PK and genetic variations along with clinical factors to develop optimal intra- and post-operative methadone dosing in children to enable precision analgesia in the future (Aim 2). Finally, Investigators will identify patient profiles with genetic, epigenetic, PK, clinical, and psychological factors to predict benefit from assigned analgesia for optimal clinical outcomes (Aim 3). The expert multidisciplinary and multicenter team will enroll a total of 1000 children to conduct a randomized clinical trial for PSF (500 children 10-<18 yrs from 4 clinical sites). In this study, specifically, Investigators will:

Aim 1. Conduct a randomized clinical trial in PSF to compare acute pain relief, opioid-sparing efficacy, and safety of standardized perioperative multidose methadone-based ERAS vs. standard-of-care non-methadone-based analgesia. Acute surgical pain, opioid needs (morphine equivalents), RD, PONV, and CPSP will be lower in methadone-based analgesia compared to short-acting opioid-based analgesia.

Aim 2. Develop precision methadone dosing based on age, CYP2B6 and ORM1 variants, and AAG. Age, CYP2B6 and ORM1 variants, AAG levels, and will explain methadone's PK variability and dose adjustments that correlate with optimal clinical outcomes among 500 children receiving methadone.

Aim 3. Identify patient profiles that predict benefits from the assigned analgesia protocol to optimize clinical outcomes. Personalized risk prediction models will be developed and validated including genetic variants (i.e., CYP2B6, CYP2D6, ABCB1, OPRM1, and FAAH), and psychological and clinical factors to predict benefit with the assigned treatments (methadone or non-methadone) for pre-specified clinical endpoints (i.e., lower acute surgical pain, RD, PONV, OD, and CPSP) in PSF.

Overall Impact: Develop actionable evidence for the efficacy of standardized, multidose, methadone-based ERAS protocols and will harness genetic, clinical, and psychological factors contributing to variability in methadone and oxycodone PK, acute surgical pain, transition to CPSP, opioid-induced PONV, RD, and dependence to develop personalized analgesia strategy and dosing for children undergoing PSF. Implementation of evidence-based standardized methadone-based ERAS pain management and individualized risk prediction will maximize acute surgical pain relief while minimizing opioid use and AEs in millions of children.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, MD, MPH, MBA, FASA
  • Phone Number: 4126474484
  • Email: sadhasivams@upmc.edu

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vidya Chidambaran, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Recruiting
        • UPMC Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 10 - < 18 years
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status 1 or 2
  3. Undergoing PSF for idiopathic scoliosis
  4. Participant or legal guardian can speak and read English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant patients
  2. Methadone allergy
  3. Preoperative prolonged QTc more than 460 msec (-30 days to 0 day)
  4. Subjects undergoing concomitant treatment with known cytochrome P450 inhibitors included in methadone labeling (i.e. macrolides (e.g. erythromycin), azole-antifungal agents (e.g. ketoconazole, voriconazole), protease inhibitors (e.g. ritonavir), fluconazole, SSRIs (e.g. sertraline, fluvoxamine)
  5. Preoperative opioid use within 30 days before surgery
  6. History of severe sleep apnea, defined as a prior sleep study demonstrating an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) greater than 10.
  7. Significant liver, kidney, neurological disease, developmental delay, or any other co-existing medical condition per discretion of the clinical investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Non-Methadone-Based Group
The comparator standard-of-care non-methadone-based analgesia arm will include standard opioid analgesia protocol without intra- and post-operative methadone per the current site standards.
Non-methadone intervention includes standard opioid analgesia protocol without intra- and post-operative methadone per the current site standards. Postoperative pain medication is recommended when reported pain level is considered moderate or higher (≥4 on NRS and FLACC).
Other Names:
  • Non-methadone
Experimental: Methadone-Based ERAS Group
The methadone-based standardized analgesia intervention arm will include standardized perioperative care and analgesia, including intraoperative intravenous methadone (1st dose: 0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg before incision; 2nd dose: 0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg administered 4 hours after the 1st dose) and postoperatively, up to 4 additional IV or oral doses of methadone (0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg) every 12 hours before discharge as part of standardized multimodal analgesia in the hospital setting.
Methadone intervention includes intraoperative intravenous methadone (1st dose: 0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg before incision; 2nd dose: 0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg administered 4 hours after the 1st dose) and postoperatively, up to 4 additional IV or oral doses of methadone (0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg) every 12 hours before discharge as part of standardized multimodal analgesia in the hospital setting.
Other Names:
  • Methadone Based

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average postoperative pain scores
Time Frame: Postoperative 48 hours
Average postoperative pain scores at 48-hours timepoint using 0-10, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), in which 0=no pain at all and 10=worst pain imaginable. Outcome will be reported based on area under the curve (AUC) as mean(SD).
Postoperative 48 hours
Total postoperative opioid use
Time Frame: Postoperative 48 hours
Number of opioids used in hospital, will be reported as mean (SD).
Postoperative 48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Inpatient Sedation
Time Frame: Postoperative 120-hours
Sedation will be assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) and validated sedation scales extracted from the EMR. Outcome will be reported as n(%).
Postoperative 120-hours
Persistent opioid use
Time Frame: 1-week, 1-month, and 3-months post-surgery
Based on Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) and self-report data. Outcome will be reported as n(%).
1-week, 1-month, and 3-months post-surgery
Presence of Chronic Postsurgical Pain (CPSP) at 3-months
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
CPSP incidence will be defined using NRS pain >3/10 and functional limitations based on Functional Disability Index (FDI). NRS Pain scale is 0=no pain at all and 10=worst pain imaginable. Outcome will be reported as n(%).
3-months post-surgery
Presence of Opioid Dependence (OD) at 3-months
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
OD will be assessed using PROMIS and Prescription Pain Medication Misuse (PPMM) scales. Outcome will be reported as n(%).
3-months post-surgery
Incidence of inpatient respiratory depression (RD)
Time Frame: Postoperative 120-hours
RD is defined as persistent oxygen desaturation (SpO2) <90% on room air or respiratory rate <8 breaths per minute requiring oxygen in the absence of airway obstruction. Outcome will be reported as n(%).
Postoperative 120-hours
Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
Time Frame: Postoperative 120-hours
PONV will be assessed by self-report, EMR, and medication use. Outcome will be reported as n(%).
Postoperative 120-hours
QTc Prolongation
Time Frame: Postoperative 48-hours
QTc prolongation is defined as >460 msec based on 12-lead or 15-lead EKG. Outcome will be reported as n(%).
Postoperative 48-hours
Length of Hospital Stay (LOS)
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
LOS will be measured in days until hospital discharge. Outcome will be reported as mean (SD).
Up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Identifiable data and specimens will be shared with the sponsor of the study. The investigators and study team will comply with all the NIH's Public Access and Data Sharing requirements including Release of Publications and Sharing of Underlying Primary Data. Release of Publications: The investigators will publish their results in open access journals for broad and free availability immediately without any embargo period. Electronic copies of publications will be deposited within four weeks of acceptance by a journal in PubMed Central with proper metadata to be made discoverable and accessible upon publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Time frame is within 5-years of study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Online collaborative tools to facilitate data sharing such as SharePoint or Xythos

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Scoliosis

Clinical Trials on Non-methadone based group

Subscribe