Development and Feasibility Testing of a Group-based PFMT Programme for Antenatal Women in Nanjing City in China

June 26, 2023 updated by: King's College London
The main objective is to co-design and assess the practicality of group-based Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) programme in pregnant women. The co-design of the PFMT programme will involve the stakeholder meeting. The feasibility of the group-based Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) programme will be achieved by using ICIQ-SF questionnaire before intervention, the completion time of the intervention and 42-day after delivery. Pregnant women with or without UI at Nanjing maternity and child health care hospital will be offered to participate if they meet the criteria of the research. Participants will be randomized into two groups, interventions and control group that gets standard care at the hospital. The intervention group will meet the midwife to receive supervised group-based PFMT once a month for 4 months in groups. Doing correct PFMT during pregnancy can help women to prevent or decrease the risk of developing UI in pregnancy and postnatal period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is to co-design and assess the practicality of group-based Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) programme in pregnant women.

PFMT has been recommended as the first-line treatment for stress urinary incontinence and the other types of urinary incontinence (UI), however, it was not well implemented in many countries due the lack of human resource and financial support. Compared to individual PFMT supervision, which is commonly conducted in hospital with additional fees, delivering PFMT in groups can help more women. Therefore, this study is to codesign and investigate the feasibility of group-based PFMT programme.

The first phase is to co-design the group-based PFMT programme: The stakeholders will be involved in this phase. The stakeholder development group will purposively sample both health professionals and pregnant women with or without UI. The stakeholder development group members will include the principal researcher, two pregnant women without UI, two pregnant women with a history of UI, two midwives (one of the midwives will help the principal researcher to deliver the training session), two physiotherapists. Data from group meetings will be digitally audio-recorded following consent and notes will be taken during the meeting. The data will be analyzed to identify the content and mode of delivery of the group-based PFMT programme along with potential barriers and facilitators.

The second phase is implementation and evaluation of the group-based PFMT programme (randomised controlled feasibility study): Participants will be randomized into two groups, intervention and control group. The control group gets standard care at the hospital. The interventional group gets supervised group-based PFMT. The intervention will be teaching the participants to do PFMT in groups. The intervention will help women to identify their pelvic floor muscles and then guide them how to contract the pelvic floor muscle correctly (the detail of the intervention will be discussed and determined in phase 1 of this project). The core outcome measures are likely to include self-reported UI, which is commonly used in studies and is able to evaluate the effectiveness of PFMT intervention in pregnant women, and UI severity which may be assessed by ICIQ-SF (a validated questionnaire which both assesses the severity of urinary loss and quality of life impact). The adherence to the programme may be assessed by attendance records from the group-based training sessions and completion of a training diary which includes the frequency and duration the participants self-report doing the exercises. The training diary will be submitted to the principal researcher after the training sessions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Jiang Su
      • Nanjing, Jiang Su, China, 210000
        • Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Nulliparous women who are aged 18 years and older;
  2. Gestational ages of 19-24 weeks;
  3. With or without the symptom of UI;
  4. Singleton fetus
  5. Capable of giving valid informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women with pregnancy complications or urine tract infection
  2. Women with previous UI symptoms before pregnancy
  3. High risk of preterm labour
  4. Women with previous urogenital surgery or diseases which may interfere with pelvic floor muscle strength, for example, pelvic organ prolapse, neurological disorders, diabetes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
The control group receives standard care, which means the participants will receive verbal instruction on PFMT from midwives without any further supervision. For reasons of equipoise, women in the comparator group will be offered the group-based PFMT intervention at the end of the study if they wish.
Experimental: Group-based PFMT group
The participants in the intervention group will receive PFMT supervision in groups. The number of women per group and the detail of the intervention will be decided through stakeholder development group meetings.The intervention will be teaching the participants to do PFMT in groups. The intervention will help women to identify their pelvic floor muscles and then guide them how to contract the pelvic floor muscle correctly (the detail of the intervention will be discussed and determined in phase 1 of this project).
The intervention group receives PFMT supervision in groups of about 6-8 women

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
self-reported UI change
Time Frame: baseline(before the intervention starts, week 0); completion of the intervention (week 13); 42 days after delivery (an average of week 19 to week 20)
assessed by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). The third question in this questionnaire is the frequency of UI which can present the self-reported UI change.
baseline(before the intervention starts, week 0); completion of the intervention (week 13); 42 days after delivery (an average of week 19 to week 20)
the impact of UI on quality of life change
Time Frame: baseline(before the intervention starts, week 0); completion of the intervention (week 13); 42 days after delivery (an average of week 19 to week 20)
assessed by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). The fifth question is the overall impact of UI which ranged from 0 to 10. In the scale, 0 means the impact on life is not at all while 10 means the impact on life is a great deal with larger number represents greater impact on life.
baseline(before the intervention starts, week 0); completion of the intervention (week 13); 42 days after delivery (an average of week 19 to week 20)
adherence to PFMT programme change 1
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
assessed by attendance records from the group-based training sessions
completion of the intervention (week 13)
adherence to PFMT programme change 2
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
assessed by record of a training diary which includes the frequency the participants self-report doing the exercises.
completion of the intervention (week 13)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rates
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
The percentage of participants take part in the intervention
completion of the intervention (week 13)
Retention of participants
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
The percentage of participants who complete the intervention
completion of the intervention (week 13)
The acceptability of randomization
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
This is a qualitative measure which will be assessed through semi-structured interview. The participants will be asked whether randomization is acceptable and the reason if the answer is not.
completion of the intervention (week 13)
The acceptability of the outcome measures
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
This is a qualitative measure which will be assessed through semi-structured interview. The participants will be asked whether the outcome measures are acceptable and the reason if the answer is not.
completion of the intervention (week 13)
The completion rates of the outcome measures
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
The percentage of the participants complete the ICIQ-SF and the training diary.
completion of the intervention (week 13)
participants' advice on group-based PFMT programme
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
This is a qualitative measure which will be assessed through semi-structured interview.
completion of the intervention (week 13)
midwife's advice on group-based PFMT programme
Time Frame: completion of the intervention (week 13)
This is a qualitative measure which will be assessed through semi-structured interview.
completion of the intervention (week 13)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 17, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Group-based PFMT group

3
Subscribe