Cognitive Control Training for Extinction in PTSD

September 4, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Identifying Clinically Relevant Neural Circuit Mechanisms of Cognitive Control Training for PTSD

The proposed study will test whether a working memory training (WMT) program improves fear extinction learning and its underlying neural circuitry in Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). WMT is designed to improves the ability to maintain task-relevant information in mind. The project will further validate the relationship between working memory and fear extinction using novel computational and multivariate analyses that link to specific PTSD symptoms. If WMT can enhance fear extinction learning, then WMT may be a powerful adjunctive treatment that can enhance exposure therapy outcomes or be leveraged as a stand-alone treatment. This project supports the Department of Veteran Affairs mission of developing viable targets of treatment for Veterans with PTSD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is prevalent, debilitating, and associated with significant levels of functional impairment in Veterans seeking care at the VA. Despite evidence that current treatments for PTSD are effective, a substantial portion of individuals maintain elevated PTSD symptoms after first line treatments. Mechanistic insight and tools that improve the neurocognitive and affective mechanisms that underlie successful clinical outcomes from evidence-based psychotherapies, like prolonged exposure, are highly needed. One of the most prominent mechanisms associated with therapeutic symptom reduction in PTSD is fear extinction. Indeed, extinction learning is a key theoretical treatment target in exposure-based therapies for PTSD. Fear extinction learning is not only an emotional process, but relies on an individual's cognitive control abilities, including working memory (WM). Under a WM framework, high WM ability offers the ability of an individual to adjudicate the competition between threat and extinction memory expression as they repeatedly encounter feared cues that are no longer threatening. Consistent with this hypothesis, previous investigations show replicable findings that variation in WM ability is associated with laboratory measures of fear extinction learning. The investigators have previously shown that psychophysiological and neural measures of fear extinction is a construct malleable to treatment. In civilian populations a brief WM training (WMT) designed to boost WM was effective in reducing anxiety during a speech exposure and was is effective in enhancing behavioral and neural markers of WM ability. These findings raise the intriguing possibility for the mechanistic link between WM and extinction, and that enhancing WM ability through WMT may also improve fear extinction learning success in Veterans with PTSD.

The current proposal aims to answer these questions. In a between-group design, Veterans diagnosed with PTSD will complete 8-sessions of working memory training (WMT) or sham-training (ST) over a four-week period. At pre- and post-training, Veterans will complete a standard fear acquisition & extinction learning task in addition to tasks assaying WM capacity and cognitive control. The investigators will identify whether WMT modulates behavior, psychophysiological, and neural changes in extinction learning. The investigators will further test the conceptual link between WM and extinction in Veterans with PTSD by testing whether neural circuits associated with high WM capacity and extinction learning are linked. The project is expected to determine if a cognitive control training program targeting WM capacity shows the potential to enhance behavioral and neural markers of fear extinction, mechanisms that are clearly integral to current PTSD treatments. These aims support the VA mission of testing and evaluating innovative treatment targets for PTSD. Results will provide a mechanistic foundation for future clinical trials that test whether adding WMT prior to or in conjunction with exposure based psychotherapies will improve clinical outcomes and further clarify existing mechanistic and neurobiological models of PTSD and its treatment for Veterans.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92161-0002
        • Recruiting
        • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel M Stout, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fluent in English
  • Meet current DSM-5 criteria for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
  • Are willing to attend 8 total remote sessions of working memory training over course of four weeks
  • Are willing to attend MRI scans pre and post working memory training
  • 4-week stability on pharmacological and psychosocial treatments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A lifetime history of psychotic disorders, lifetime history of bipolar disorder
  • Past-year severe substance use and severe alcohol use disorder. Mild-to-moderate alcohol use disorder will be allowed to enhance generalizability in our sample due to the high comorbidity of alcohol use and PTSD
  • History of any neurological disorder that might be associated with cognitive dysfunction (e.g., cerebrovascular accident, intracranial surgery, aneurysm, seizure disorder)
  • Acute suicidality requiring immediate clinical intervention
  • Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, mild to moderate levels of TBI (mTBI) will be included.
  • Receiving benzodiazepines or medications with anticholinergic effects that may affect fear learning measures
  • Inability to safely complete fMRI session (i.e., metal in body, medical implants)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Working Memory Training
Computer-administered working memory training program. WMT is a modified working memory capacity task designed to train working memory functioning. WMT is designed to contain high interference across trials and is adaptive to performance. As participants improve working memory, the task becomes more difficult.
Computer-administered working memory training program. WMT is a modified working memory capacity task designed to train working memory functioning. WMT is designed to contain high interference across trials and is adaptive to performance. As participants improve working memory, the task becomes more difficult.
Other Names:
  • WMT
Sham Comparator: Sham Training
The Sham condition requires participants to complete a similar computer task for the same length of time. The Sham Training is a modified working memory capacity task designed to place less demands on working memory.
The Sham condition requires participants to complete a similar computer task for the same length of time. The Sham Training is a modified working memory capacity task designed to place less demands on working memory.
Other Names:
  • Sham

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral Threat Expectancy Ratings During Extinction Performance
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Threat Expectancy Ratings. Behavioral ratings will be collected during the extinction learning task. Responses will be on scale of 1- 4. High scores reflect greater threat expectancy. It is expected that the working memory training group (WMT) will have lower threat expectancy ratings during extinction learning than the Sham group.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Extinction Electrodermal Activity Response
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Electrodermal Activity Response. Responses are measured in microsiemens and time-locked to the CS+ trials during extinction learning. It is expected that the working memory training group (WMT) will have lower electrodermal activity responses during extinction learning than the Sham group.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Extinction Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Response
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to measure Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Response during the Extinction task. BOLD response during the extinction task conditions are measured using % signal change from baseline BOLD activity with higher scores indicating greater activation. It is expected that the working memory training group (WMT) will have greater changes in BOLD responses during extinction learning than the Sham group.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working Memory Task Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Response
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to measure Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Response during a working memory capacity task while undergoing functional MRI. BOLD response to the task conditions is measured using % signal change with higher scores indicating greater activation.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Working memory capacity change detection task
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
This behavioral task measures the number of visual items maintained in working memory and is a measure of working memory capacity. This task will use simple geometric shapes as stimuli. Scores are measured using percent accuracy (o - 100%) and a measure of working memory capacity (K-score range: 0 - 6 in this task). High scores indicate greater accuracy and working memory capacity.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Affective working memory task
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
An affective working memory task. A behavioral task, the affective working memory task measures working memory capacity - how many stimuli are stored in working memory) and include conditions with an emotional distractors. Scores are measured using percent accuracy (range: 0-100%) and a measure of working memory capacity (K-score range: 0 - 2 in this task). High scores indicate greater accuracy and working memory capacity. Reaction time (in milliseconds) will also be collected. High Reaction time indicates slower or more impaired working memory ability.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Flanker Task
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
This behavioral task measures cognitive and motor inhibition. Stimuli consist of arrows presented at the center of a computer screen. Reaction Time (in milliseconds) for button presses will be the primary variable. High scores indicate slower reaction time to make the required behavioral response. We will also measure accuracy, with high scores indicating higher accuracy and will be scored as percent correct (range: 0-100%)
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Affective stop signal task
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
This behavioral task measures cognitive and motor inhibitory control and will include affective stimuli. Primary outcome variables will be reaction time (in milliseconds) and accuracy (0 to 100%). High reaction time indicates slow inhibitory control on stop signal trials.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Self-reported Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms will be measured using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).The total score ranges from 0-80, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Depression symptoms will be measured using the PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9). Scores range from 0 - 27. Higher scores indicating higher depression symptoms and severity.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Anxiety symptoms will be measured with the General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7). The total score ranges from 0-21. High scores indicate higher levels of anxiety symptoms.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5)
Time Frame: Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks
Clinician-rated Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms and PTSD diagnostic status will be measured using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Symptom severity ranges from 0 - 80. High scores indicate greater PTSD symptom severity.
Baseline, Approximately 5 or 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel M Stout, PhD, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MHBP-001-23F
  • 1I01CX002760 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract: VA Office of Research and Development)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PTSD

Clinical Trials on Working Memory Training

Subscribe