Computerized Working Memory Training in Very-low-birth-weight Children at Preschool Age

Computerized Working Memory Training Evaluated With Clinical Assessments and Quantitative EEG in Very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) Children at Preschool Age

The main aim of this prospective interventional study is to compare quantitative EEG findings and cognitive and neuropsychological test results before and after training with the Cogmed JM program in a group of very-low-birth-weight children in preschool age, i.e. ages 5-6 years. The investigators hypothesize that the children in the study may respond positively to the computerized training and improve working memory, but probably to different degrees depending on the underlying neurological condition. The investigators also hypothesize that training may benefit additional executive functions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Children born preterm are at increased risk of neurological disabilities due to perinatal brain damage. During the last ten years an increasing number of especially extremely low birth weight (ELBW: BW ≤ 1000g) children has survived, and one might wonder whether this has lead to increased amount of brain pathology and impairments among survivors. Major impairments including cerebral palsy, mental retardation and impaired vision and hearing are most common in children born extremely preterm (gestational age below 28 weeks). In addition to this, a large part of survivors after preterm birth will experience motor problems, cognitive dysfunctions, psychiatric and behavioural problems of varying severity.

In our previous research we have found significant deficits in working memory in very preterm born children, and this seems to have a strong influence on cognitive functioning. During the last years, several studies have shown that working memory skills can be trained, and training working memory to improve cognition and executive functions is regarded as one of the major steps forward in neuroscience in recent years.

The working memory training program version for preschoolers, Cogmed JM, has recently been launched. Healthy preschoolers trained on working memory improved significantly on trained tasks but also on non-trained tests of spatial and verbal working memory, as well as transfer effects on attention. The preschool version of the program has not yet been administered to preterm born or other neurologic high risk children in this age group.

The main aim of this prospective interventional study is to compare quantitative EEG findings and cognitive and neuropsychological test results before and after training with the Cogmed JM program in a group of very-low-birth-weight children in preschool age, i.e. ages 5-6 years. We hypothesise that the children in the study may respond positively to the computerized training and improve working memory, but probably to different degrees depending on the underlying neurological condition. We also hypothesise that training may benefit additional executive functions.

The children in the study will be divided into two subgroups (15/15 children). Subgroup A will start training, while subgroup B waits during this first training period. Subgroup B will therefore act as a control group. After 8 weeks subgroup B will then start training. This is in agreement with the so-called Stepped Wedge design (Brown and Lilford 2006).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Trondheim, Norway
        • St Olavs Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • VLBW (birth weight ≤ 1500 grams)
  • preschool child
  • born at St. Olav's University Hospital in Trondheim in 2005 and 2006

Exclusion Criteria:

  • birth weight >1500 grams
  • diagnosed genetic syndromes
  • severe cerebral palsy with totally impaired bilateral hand function (GMFCS - gross motor function classification scale level V)
  • blindness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: working memory training
Cogmed JM working memory training
daily training for 5 weeks on a computerized program for training working memory; a total of 25 training sessions. Program: Cogmed JM - preschool version of program: 15-20 minutes training per day
Experimental: delayed working memory training
Cogmed JM working memory training after 8 weeks waiting
Waiting after baseline testing for 8 weeks. Daily training on a computerized program for training working memory for 5 weeks. 25 training sessions in total. Program: Cogmed JM - preschool version of program: 15-20 minutes training per day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
working memory capacity
Time Frame: 6 months
Automated Working Memory Assessment (AWMA)(visual working memory); digit span (from WISC-IV); Repetition of scentences (from NEPSY battery); Remembering and oral story (from NEPSY battery); Remembering faces (from NEPSY battery)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
behavioral function
Time Frame: 6 months
Vineland adaptive behaviour scales (survey form)
6 months
executive function
Time Frame: 6 months
The ADHD Rating Scale-IV (parents report)
6 months
anxiety as judged by parents
Time Frame: 6 months
The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED- parent report); Preschool Anxiety Scale (parent report)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jon Skranes, PhD prof, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011/532

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infant, Very Low Birth Weight

Clinical Trials on Cogmed JM working memory training

3
Subscribe