Effects of Stochastic Whole-body Vibration Training on Balance and Executive Functions

October 16, 2024 updated by: University of Bern

Immediate Effects of Stochastic Whole-body Vibration Training on Balance and Executive Functions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Falls represent a significant financial burden, costing millions of dollars annually in Switzerland (SUVA, 2022). Good cognitive abilities and good balance represent modifiable protective factors against falls (Kurz, 2008). The present study investigates the impact of stochastic whole-body vibration training (SR-WBV) on executive functions and balance. To this end, participants were randomized into an intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group underwent SR-WBV at a frequency of 5 Hertz (Hz), while participants in the control group underwent SR-WBV at 2 Hz. The training on an SRT Zeptor® Medical plus noise device consisted of three one-minute intervals of vibration, interspersed with one-minute rest periods. Data on executive functions (Updating, Shifting, Inhibition) and balance were collected before and after the intervention , complemented by subjective assessments of concentration and balance through questionnaires.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3012
        • Institut für Psychologie, Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • The presence of osteosynthetic materials (e.g., screws, plates, wires)
  • Joint problems (particularly in the knees, hips, and back)
  • Musculoskeletal issues
  • Disc herniation
  • Rheumatism
  • Cardiovascular problems
  • Balance disorders
  • Red-green color blindness
  • Intensive training within 24 hours prior to the assessment.
  • Use of central nervous system medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 5 Hertz Whole-Body Vibration Intervention
Three 1-minute sessions of stochastic whole-body vibration (SR-WBV) training with 1-minute breaks at 5 Hz

Both the experimental group and the control group performed their training on an SRT Zeptor® Medical plus noise device (Frei Swiss AG, Zurich). The device featured two independent foot plates that vibrated stochastically in all three dimensions, resulting in multidimensional movement. During the training, participants were instructed to stand on the foot plates with both feet, keep their arms relaxed at their sides, maintain a slight bend in their knees, and focus their gaze on a fixation cross on the wall. Following the protocol used in Faes et al. (2018), each training session consisted of three series, each comprising one minute of vibration training followed by one minute of rest.

The vibration frequency for the intervention group was set at 5 Hz.

Sham Comparator: 2 Hertz Whole-Body Vibration Intervention
Three 1-minute sessions of stochastic whole-body vibration (SR-WBV) training with 1-minute breaks at 2 Hz

Both the experimental group and the control group performed their training on an SRT Zeptor® Medical plus noise device (Frei Swiss AG, Zurich). The device featured two independent foot plates that vibrated stochastically in all three dimensions, resulting in multidimensional movement. During the training, participants were instructed to stand on the foot plates with both feet, keep their arms relaxed at their sides, maintain a slight bend in their knees, and focus their gaze on a fixation cross on the wall. Following the protocol used in Faes et al. (2018), each training session consisted of three series, each comprising one minute of vibration training followed by one minute of rest.

The vibration frequency for the intervention group was set at 2 Hz.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sense of Balance (Change from Baseline)
Time Frame: 19 min before and 19 min after the intervention (immediate effects)

Measured with subjective scale (sense of balance from 0 to 10)

How do you assess your personal sensations regarding muscles and joints (back pain, shoulder and neck pain, leg muscle pain, etc.) at this moment?

Please slide the scale for each aspect to the most appropriate level.

0 means no pain, and 10 means the most intense pain imaginable.

19 min before and 19 min after the intervention (immediate effects)
Balance (Change from Baseline)
Time Frame: Immediately before and 13 min after the intervention (immediate effects)

Measured with the modified star excursion balance test (m-SEBT). Higher values indicate better balance with 0cm being the minimum and ca. 100cm indicating very good balance, i.e. reach distance.

In this balance test, participants stand on one leg, while the range of motion of the other leg is measured in eight directions: anterior (ANT), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL).

(Duration: 5 min)

Immediately before and 13 min after the intervention (immediate effects)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Executive functions (Shifting) (Change from Baseline)
Time Frame: 10 min before and 8 min after the intervention (immediate effects)

Measured with the Trail-Making Test B

For TMT B, participants were presented with circles filled with both numbers and letters. They were required to click the circles in ascending order, alternating between numbers and letters (e.g., 1, A, 2, B, 3, C). The practice task consisted of six circles, and the main test involved 24 circles. The processing time was measured in milliseconds.

Thus, higher scores in the Trail-Making Test B indicate lower shifting ability.

(Duration: 3 min)

10 min before and 8 min after the intervention (immediate effects)
Executive functions (Updating) (Change from Baseline)
Time Frame: 18 min before and immediately after the intervention (immediate effects)

Measured with the Running Span-Task

Participants were presented with a series of letters of varying lengths (3 to 8 letters).

For each participant, both the total Running Span (sum of all correctly recalled target items) and the Running Span Score (sum of correctly recalled target items from sets that included at least one distractor) were calculated.

Thus, higher scores (MIN = 0) in the Running Span-Task indicate higher updating ability.

(Duration: 8 min)

18 min before and immediately after the intervention (immediate effects)
Executive functions (Inhibition) (Change from Baseline)
Time Frame: 7 min before and 11 min after the intervention (immediate effects)

Measured with the Stroop Test in milliseconds (Reaction Time)

The reaction times (in milliseconds) for all correctly identified incongruent items were subtracted from those for control items.

0 ms indicate no cognitive interference, i.e. maximal inhibitory control

Thus, higher scores in the Stroop Test indicate higher cognitive interference, i.e. poorer inhibitory control

(Duration: 2 min)

7 min before and 11 min after the intervention (immediate effects)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Achim Elfering, Prof. Dr. phil. nat., University of Bern

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-07-00005

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Upon arrival, participants generated an individual ID, which was linked to their identity in a password-protected file for two weeks, during which they could request data deletion. After this period, the link was permanently removed, ensuring full anonymity. Only aggregated statistical analyses were conducted.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on 5Hz Stochastic Resonance Whole-Body Vibration Training

Subscribe