L-AmB_ Retrospective mUlticenter Study on Mycosis prOphylaxis (L-AmB_RUSCO)

April 30, 2025 updated by: Elio Castagnola, Istituto Giannina Gaslini

Tolerability and Effectiveness of Extended Dosing of Liposomal Amphotericin B (L-AmB) for Primary Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Disease in High-risk Pediatric Patients: a Retrospective Multicenter Study

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) still represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in patients undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy or allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). International guidelines recommend primary antifungal prophylaxis to reduce mortality and morbidity in these patients. Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) can represent a valid alternative for antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric age as its spectrum is extended to both molds and yeasts, has reduced pharmacological interactions with the antineoplastic drugs most frequently used in treatment protocols. All this despite the availability of an intravenous formulation which can ensure complete compliance with the treatment. L-AmB prophylaxis has been proposed with different dosages: 1 mg/kg every other day vs 2.5 mg/kg/dose twice-a-week vs 5 mg/kg/once-a-week)

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) still represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in patients undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy or allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In this setting children presents some differences compared to adults in terms of risk factors for IFD: different treatment schemes, age-related comorbidities, diagnostic tools with different sensitivity. International guidelines strongly recommend primary prophylaxis in children at high risk of developing IFD to reduce disease-related morbidity and mortality (patients are considered to be at high risk in the presence of an IFD incidence ≥10%). Although the risk factors are well characterized in the literature and substantially unchanged over time, the local epidemiology must be considered in the evaluation of the best prophylaxis strategy. Drugs presently recommended for antifungal prophylaxis have been poorly studied in children, anyway triazoles (mainly posaconaozle) are indicated as possible prophylactic agents also in pediatrics. However, these drugs can present important interactions with drugs important for the treatment of pediatric leukemias (e.g. vinca alkaloids and posaconazole) and sometimes they lack of specific pediatric formulations, fact that can reduce compliance because of bad taste of the available formulations (oral solutions) or difficulties in swallowing and risk of poor absorption in presence of mucositis (bulky, non-divisible pills or capsules). Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) can represent a valid alternative for antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric age as its spectrum is extended to both molds and yeasts, has reduced pharmacological interactions with the antineoplastic drugs most frequently used in treatment protocols. All this despite the availability of an intravenous formulation only which may require hospital access or activation of the home care team, but which can ensure complete compliance with the treatment. L-AmB prophylaxis has been proposed with different dosages: 1 mg/kg every other day vs 2.5 mg/kg/dose twice-a-week vs 5 mg/kg/once-a-week).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Genoa, Italy, 16146
        • Istituto Giannina Gaslini

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All pediatric patients who received extended dosing of liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis from 01/01/2019 to 31/12/2023

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients at high risk of developing IFD receiving chemotherapy for (1st line or relapse treatment) or allo-HSCT for which primary fungal prophylaxis with extended dosing of liposomal amphotericin B has been administered

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous diagnosis of IFD (secondary prophylaxis),
  • contraindications to liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients at high risk of developing IFD
patients at high risk of developing IFD receiving chemotherapy for (1st line or relapse treatment) or allo-HSCT for which primary fungal prophylaxis with Liposomal amphotericin B has been administered between 01/01/2019 to 31/12/2023
collect data on tolerability and effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerability of extended dosing of liposomal amphotericin B
Time Frame: In the period between the first and last administration of L-AmB
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events (both clinical and laboratoristic adverse events) as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
In the period between the first and last administration of L-AmB

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of extended dosing of liposomal amphotericin B
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after the last administration of L-AmB
Number of new diagnoses of IFD classified as proven, probable or possible according to EORTC/MSG criteria
Up to 6 months after the last administration of L-AmB

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Invasive Fungal Infections

Clinical Trials on Liposomal Amphotericin B (LAmB)

Subscribe