The Effects of PechaKucha Presentation About Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries

May 19, 2025 updated by: MAİDE YEŞİLYURT

The Effects of PechaKucha Presentation About Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries on Knowledge and Attitudes of Nursing Students: a Randomized Controlled Study

In the literature, no research has been found examining the knowledge and attitudes of students regarding medical device related pressure injury education given using the PK method. In addition to contributing to the existing literature, this research will also contribute to determining the effect of TAIBY training given with PK, a current presentation technique, on the learning and attitude levels of nursing students.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Medical device-associated pressure injuries occur on the tissue and mucous membranes due to the pressure created by the medical device, but differ from other pressure injuries in that they do not occur on bone protrusions. European Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (EPUAP), The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) and the Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA) define these injuries as "pressure injuries caused by tools used for diagnosis or treatment." It can develop in any anatomical region it comes into contact with, especially the ear, foot, neck, head and face. It is known that medical device-related pressure injuries constitute approximately one-third of the pressure injuries in hospitalized adult patients. Prevention and care interventions in medical device-related pressure injuries should be carried out in line with proven recommendations. is important for patient safety.

pread Pecha kucha (PK) is an innovative form of presentation used around the world (Byrne, 2016). PK, derived from the Japanese word meaning "chat", helps present creative works with visual images Pecha kucha is a compact and effective presentation method consisting of 20 slides, each presented in 20 seconds This "20×20" format, which requires careful editing and develops the use of critical communication skills, serves as an innovative and valuable tool that allows the presenter to dynamically and systematically present important information worth sharing to the audience . Thanks to Pecha Kucha, the presenter conveys the topic quickly and clearly without deviating from the essence of the topic Beyer et al. (2012) reported that PK may be superior to traditional PowerPoint presentations in terms of learning function. Klentzin et al. (2010) also stated that PK is as effective as traditional PowerPoint presentations in retaining information. It is stated that with the pecha kucha method, information can be presented in a more concise way, without any difference in quality, compared to a longer PowerPoint presentation

. PK presentation, including visual and narrative presentation, does not take more than 7-8 minutes It is stated that the use of the PK method is effective in transferring theoretical content into practice and providing emotional learning in nursing education (Byrne, 2016). Students studying in health services were given training on the prevention of pressure injuries with the PK presentation method, and it was determined that the knowledge level of the students increased with the PK method . In a study comparing PK and traditional presentation in nursing education, it was found that there was no difference between the two methods, but it was recommended that the PK method be used on issues that require attention In studies using PK in medical education, it was stated that the majority of students liked this learning method and wanted it to be used in other courses .

In the literature, no research has been found examining the knowledge and attitudes of students regarding medical device related pressure ınury education given using the PK method. In addition to contributing to the existing literature, this research will also contribute to determining the effect of training given with PK, a current presentation technique, on the learning and attitude levels of nursing students.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Merkez, Turkey
        • Aksaray University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a nursing student
  • volunteer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not being a nursing student
  • not volunteering

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: experimental arm
Before medical device related pressure injury (MDRPI) training is given to students, an introductory characteristics form and knowledge and attitude surveys will be applied (pre-test). The survey questions will be administered immediately after the PK training presentation containing MDRPI information is given to the students (Posttest 1), and 4 weeks later (Posttest 2).
Students in the experimental arm will be given training on MDRPI.
Other Names:
  • EDUCATION RELATED TO MDRPI
No Intervention: control arm
Before students are given MDRPI training, an introductory characteristics form and knowledge and attitude surveys will be administered (pre-test). The survey questions will be administered immediately after the traditional educational presentation containing MDRPI information is given to the students (Posttest 1), and again 4 weeks later (Posttest 2).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure injury knowledge level of students
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
students' "Medical Device-related Pressure Sore Knowledge Level Assessment Test score",
up to 4 weeks
students' pressure injury attitude level
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
students' "Pressure Injury Attitude Survey Regarding Medical Devices score"
up to 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Serpil YUKSEL, PHD, Necmettin Erbakan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical Device Site Injury

Clinical Trials on Pecha Kucha presentation on MDPRI

Subscribe