Grafting of the Peri-implant Bony Defects Around Immediate Implants Using Xenogenic Versus Alloplastic Sticky Grafts: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

October 21, 2024 updated by: bassant mohye, Cairo University
In patients with a single non restorable tooth, does filling the peri-implant buccal gap with alloplastic sticky grafts result comparable results compared to xenogenic sticky grafts?

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The buccal aspect of the dental implant has great importance, especially in the aesthetic zone, because the buccal bone is very thin especially in the anterior maxilla and its resorption can result in recession of the soft tissue. A gap occurs in immediately placed implant due to discrepancy between the dimensions of the extraction socket and the implant. Augmentation of the buccal gap decreases the amount of buccal bone resorption and soft tissue recession . Filling the peri-implant defects has been widely discussed to prevent further bone loss. The use of biologic materials such as platelet rich fibrin can enhance the quality of alloplastic bone grafts to give comparable effect when compared to xenogenic grafts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with healthy systemic condition (Mazzotti et al., 2023).
  2. Age from 20-50 years old
  3. Patients must be free of any systemic disease which could influence the surgical procedure.
  4. Tooth involved in the esthetic zone.
  5. Sufficient hard and soft tissue volume in vertical and buccolingual direction
  6. Natural teeth adjacent to the involved tooth will be required to be free from infection.
  7. Controlled oral hygiene.
  8. Indication for tooth extraction included (Degidi et al., 2012);

    • Endodontic failures
    • Untreatable caries
    • Non- restorable teeth
    • Vertical root fracture
    • Remaining roots

Exclusion Criteria:

- 1.Pregnant females 2.Smokers (Khuller, 2009) 3.Unmotivated and uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene 4.Patients with habits that may compromise the longevity and affect the result of the study as alcoholism or parafunctional habits.

5.Presence of acute dento-alveolar infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: immediate implant placement surgery with filling the gap distance with alloplastic sticky graft
immediate implant placement surgery with filling the gap distance with injectable platelet rich fibrin combined with alloplast.
gap distance augmentation with bone graft
Other Names:
  • gap distance augmentation
Experimental: immediate implant placement surgery with filling the gap distance with xenogenic sticky bone
immediate implant placement surgery with filling the gap distance with injectable platelet rich fibrin combined with xenograft.
gap distance augmentation with bone graft
Other Names:
  • gap distance augmentation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bone changes
Time Frame: 6 months
superimposition
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pink esthetic score
Time Frame: 6 months
soft tissue esthetics
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Loss, Alveolar

Clinical Trials on dental implant with bone augmentation

Subscribe